SEC Filing | Brandywine Realty Trust

View:

Download DOC

Download XLS

Prepared and filed by St Ives Burrups

Click here to Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

	For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004

	OR

	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________________________ to __________________________

Commission file number 001-9106

Brandywine Realty Trust

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland		23-2413352

(State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

401 Plymouth Road, Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania		19462

(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code		(610) 325-5600

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class		Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Shares of Beneficial Interest, (par value $0.01 per share)		New York Stock Exchange

7.50% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest (par value $0.01 per share)		New York Stock Exchange

7.375% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest (par value $0.01 per share)		New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes checked box

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. checked box

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes checked box

The aggregate market value of the Common Shares of Beneficial Interest held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of the last day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter was $1.2 billion. The aggregate market value has been computed by reference to the closing price of the Common Shares of Beneficial Interest on the New York Stock Exchange on such date. An aggregate of 55,625,648 Common Shares of Beneficial Interest were outstanding as of March 9, 2005.

Documents Incorporated By Reference

Portions of the proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Brandywine Realty Trust to be held May 2, 2005 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FORM 10-K

	Page

PART I

Item 1. Business	4

Item 2. Properties	21

Item 3. Legal Proceedings	32

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	32

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	32

Item 6. Selected Financial Data	34

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	34

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	48

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	48

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	48

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures	48

Item 9B. Other Information	49

PART III

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant	49

Item 11. Executive Compensation	49

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters	49

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions	50

Item 14. Principle Accountant Fees and Services	50

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	50

SIGNATURES	55

-3-

Back to Contents

PART I

Item 1. Business

General

As used herein, the terms “we,” “us,” “our” or the “Company” refer to Brandywine Realty Trust, a Maryland real estate investment trust, individually or together with its subsidiaries, including Brandywine Operating Partnership, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”), a Delaware limited partnership. We are a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”) active in acquiring, developing, redeveloping, leasing and managing office and industrial properties. As of December 31, 2004, we owned 222 office properties, 23 industrial facilities and one mixed-use property (the “Properties”) containing an aggregate of approximately 19.2 million net rentable square feet. As of December 31, 2004, we held economic interests in nine unconsolidated real estate ventures that contain approximately 1.6 million net rentable square feet (the “Real Estate Ventures”). In addition, we own interests in two consolidated real estate ventures that own two office properties containing approximately 0.2 million net rentable square feet. We also own approximately 445 acres of undeveloped land. The Properties are located in the office and industrial markets in and surrounding Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Wilmington, Delaware; Southern and Central New Jersey; and Richmond, Virginia. As of December 31, 2004, we were performing management and leasing services for 35 other properties containing an aggregate of 2.7 million net rentable square feet, excluding certain of the Real Estate Ventures which we manage.

Significant Transactions During 2004

Real Estate Acquisitions/Dispositions

In March 2004, we sold 1255 Broad Street, a property totaling 37,478 square feet located in Bloomfield, New Jersey, for a sales price of $4.0 million. We also sold 2201 Dabney Road, a property totaling 45,000 square feet located in Richmond, Virginia, for a sales price of $2.1 million.

In May 2004, we sold a land parcel containing 5.3 acres in Richmond, Virgina for a sales price of $1.2 million.

In June 2004, we sold 935 First Avenue, a property totaling 103,090 square feet located in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, for a sales price of $17.0 million.

In July 2004, we acquired Five Greentree, a property totaling 169,534 square feet located in Marlton, New Jersey, for a purchase price of $18.4 million.

In July 2004, we completed the purchase and sale of a land parcel totaling 93 acres in two separate transactions with unrelated third parties. The purchase and sale resulted in a net gain of approximately $1.5 million. As part of the sale, we provided the purchaser $4.0 million of mortgage financing. Subsequent to the sale, the mortgage note was fully repaid.

In August 2004, we sold a land parcel totaling 19.4 acres in Mount Laurel, New Jersey for a sales price of $1.3 million.

In September 2004, we acquired a land parcel totaling 58.4 acres in Newtown, Pennsylvania for a purchase price of $4.5 million.

In September 2004, we acquired 100% of the partnership interests in The Rubenstein Company, L.P. (“TRC”). Through the acquisition, we acquired 14 office properties (the “TRC Properties”) located in Pennsylvania and Delaware that contain approximately 3.5 million net rentable square feet. The aggregate consideration was $630.5 million including $28.5 million of closing costs and debt prepayment penalties that are included in the basis of the assets acquired. The consideration was paid with $539.6 million of cash, $79.3 million of debt assumed, $1.6 million of other liabilities assumed and 343,006 Class A Units valued

-4-

Back to Contents

at $10.0 million. In addition, we agreed to issue to the sellers up to a maximum of $9.7 million of additional Class A Units of the Operating Partnership if certain of the properties achieve at least 95% occupancy prior to September 21, 2007.

In September 2004, we sold a land parcel containing 4.6 acres in Richmond, Virgina for a sales price of $0.3 million.

In December 2004, we sold 55 U.S. Avenue located in Gibbsboro, New Jersey, a property totaling 138,982 square feet, for a sales price of $5.5 million. As part of the sale, we provided the purchaser $4.4 million of mortgage financing.

Debt Financings

In May 2004, we replaced our then existing credit facility with a $450 million unsecured credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) that matures in May 2007, subject to a one-year extension option. We may elect to increase the Credit Facility to $600 million subject to the absence of any defaults and our ability to acquire additional commitments from our existing lenders or new lenders. The Credit Facility generally bears interest at LIBOR plus a spread over LIBOR ranging from 0.65% to 1.20% based on our unsecured senior debt rating.

In September 2004, we repaid all amounts due under our then existing $100.0 million unsecured term loan and obtained two additional unsecured term loans in the principal amounts of $320.0 million (the “2007 Term Loan”) and $113.0 million (the “2008 Term Loan”). The 2007 Term Loan was scheduled to mature in September 2007 and the 2008 Term Loan was scheduled to mature in September 2008. The 2007 and 2008 Term Loans were obtained to finance a portion of the TRC acquisition.

In October 2004, the Operating Partnership issued $275.0 million of its 2009 4.5% unsecured notes (the “2009 Notes”) and $250.0 million of its 2014 5.4% unsecured notes (the “2014 Notes”) in an underwritten public offering. We received net proceeds, after discounts, of approximately $520.1 million. We and certain of the wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership fully and unconditionally guaranteed the payment of principal and interest on the Notes. In anticipation of the issuance of the Notes, we entered into treasury lock agreements with notional amounts totaling $194.8 million with an expiration of 5 years at an all-in rate of 4.8% and with notional amounts totaling $188.0 million with an expiration of 10 years at an all-in rate of 5.6%. Upon issuance of the Notes, we terminated the treasury lock agreements at a total cost of $3.2 million that will be amortized to interest expense over the life of the respective Notes. The net proceeds of the 2009 Notes and 2014 Notes were used to repay the $320.0 million 2007 Term Loan, to settle the treasury lock agreements discussed above and to reduce borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility.

In December 2004, the Operating Partnership sold $113.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 2008 unsecured notes (the “2008 Notes”) to a group of qualified institutional investors. The 2008 Notes bear interest from their date of issuance at the rate of 4.34% per annum and mature on December 14, 2008. The 2008 Notes do not provide for scheduled principal amortization prior to the maturity date. We and certain of the subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership have fully and unconditionally guaranteed the payment of principal and interest on the 2008 Notes. A former partner in TRC has also provided a guaranty of the 2008 Notes (although this guaranty does not in any way limit or diminish the obligations of the Operating Partnership or obligations arising under the guarantees that we and certain subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership provided). The note purchase agreement for the 2008 Notes contains various affirmative and negative covenants, including covenants that limit our incurrence of additional indebtedness. The proceeds from the 2008 Notes were used to repay the 2008 Term Loan.

Equity Issuances

In January 2004, we sold 2,645,000 Common Shares in an underwritten public offering for net proceeds (net of transaction costs) of approximately $69.2 million.

-5-

Back to Contents

In February 2004, the Operating Partnership redeemed all of its outstanding Series B Preferred Units for an aggregate price of $93.0 million, together with accrued but unpaid distributions from January 1, 2004. The Series B Preferred Units had an aggregate stated value of $97.5 million and accrued distributions at 7.25% per annum. We recorded a gain of $4.5 million related to the redemption.

In February 2004, we sold 2,300,000 7.375% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, each with a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share, in an underwritten public offering for net proceeds (net of transaction costs) of $55.5 million.

In March 2004, we sold 1,840,000 Common Shares in an underwritten public offering for net proceeds (net of transaction costs) of $50.5 million.

In September 2004, we sold 7,750,000 Common Shares in an underwritten public offering for net proceeds (net of transaction costs) of $217.0 million.

Organization

Brandywine Realty Trust was organized and commenced its operations in 1986 as a Maryland REIT. We own our assets and conduct our operations through the Operating Partnership and subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership. We control the Operating Partnership as its sole general partner, and as of December 31, 2004, we owned a 96.4% interest in the Operating Partnership. Our structure as an “UPREIT” is designed, in part, to permit persons contributing properties to us to defer some or all of the tax liability they might otherwise incur in a sale of properties.

Our executive offices and our Pennsylvania regional offices are located at 401 Plymouth Road, Suite 500, Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania 19462 and our telephone number is (610) 325-5600. We have an internet website at www.brandywinerealty.com. We are not incorporating by reference in this Form 10-K any material from our website. The reference to our website is an inactive textual reference to the uniform resource locator (URL) and is for your reference only. We also have regional offices in Mount Laurel, New Jersey; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Richmond, Virginia.

Business Objective

Our business objective is to effectively deploy capital to maximize return on investment. To accomplish this objective we seek to:

	•	maximize cash flow through aggressive leasing strategies that we adapt to market conditions and that are designed to continue market outperformance and capture potential rental growth as rental rates increase and as below-market leases are renewed;

	•	attain a high tenant retention rate by providing a full array of property management and maintenance services and tenant service programs responsive to the varying needs of our diverse tenant base;

	•	increase the economic diversification of our tenant base while maximizing economies of scale;

	•	deploy our existing land inventory and seek new land parcels on which to develop high-quality office and industrial properties to service our tenant base, as warranted by market conditions;

	•	capitalize on our redevelopment expertise to selectively acquire, redevelop and reposition underperforming properties in desirable locations;

	•	acquire high-quality office and industrial properties and portfolios of such properties at attractive yields in selected submarkets in the Mid-Atlantic region that we expect will experience economic growth and provide barriers to entry;

-6-

Back to Contents

	•	objectively assess alternative capital investment strategies including, but not limited to, joint venture opportunities with high-quality partners having attractive real estate holdings or significant financial resources; and

	•	utilize our reputation as one of our region’s largest full-service real estate development and management organizations to identify new business opportunities that will expand our business and create long-term value.

We expect to continue to concentrate our real estate activities in submarkets within the Mid-Atlantic region where we believe that:

	•	barriers to entry (such as zoning restrictions, utility availability, infrastructure limitations, development moratoriums and limited developable land) will create supply constraints on office and industrial space;

	•	current market rents and absorption statistics justify limited new construction activity;

	•	we can maximize market penetration by accumulating a critical mass of properties and thereby enhance operating efficiencies; and

	•	there is potential for economic growth.

We are also assessing entry into additional regions where we believe we can effectively further our business objective.

Policies With Respect To Certain Activities

The following is a discussion of our investment, financing and other policies. These policies have been determined by our Board of Trustees and may be amended or revised from time to time by the Board of Trustees without a vote of shareholders.

Investments in Real Estate or Interests in Real Estate

We may develop, purchase or lease income-producing properties for long-term investment, expand and improve the Properties presently owned or other properties purchased, or sell such properties, in whole or in part, as circumstances warrant. Although there is no limitation on the types of development activities that we may undertake, we expect that our development activities will generally be on a build-to-suit basis for particular tenants, or where a significant portion of the building is pre-leased before construction begins. We may also participate with other entities in property ownership through joint ventures or other types of co-ownership. Our equity investments may be subject to existing or future mortgage financing and other indebtedness that will have priority over our equity investments.

Securities of or Interests in Entities Primarily Engaged in Real Estate Activities and Other Issuers

Subject to the percentage of ownership limitations and gross income tests necessary for REIT qualification, we may invest in securities of other REITs, other entities engaged in real estate activities or securities of other issuers. We may enter into joint ventures or partnerships for the purpose of obtaining an equity interest in a particular property. We do not currently intend to invest in the securities of other issuers except in connection with joint ventures or acquisitions of indirect interests in properties.

-7-

Back to Contents

Investments in Real Estate Mortgages

While our current portfolio consists of, and our business objectives emphasize, equity investments in commercial real estate, we may, in the discretion of management or of the Board of Trustees, invest in other types of equity real estate investments, mortgages and other real estate interests. We do not presently intend to invest to a significant extent in mortgages or deeds of trust, but may invest in participating or convertible mortgages if we conclude that we may benefit from the cash flow or any appreciation in the value of the property.

Disposition

Our disposition of Properties is based upon management’s periodic review of our portfolio and the determination by management and the Board of Trustees that such action would be in the best interests of the Company.

Financing Policies

As a general policy, we intend, but are not obligated, to maintain a long-term average debt-to-market capitalization ratio of no more than 50%. Our mortgages, credit facilities and unsecured debt securities contain customary restrictions, requirements and other limitations on our ability to incur indebtedness. Our charter documents do not limit the amount or percentage of indebtedness that we may incur. We have not established any limit on the number or amount of mortgages that may be placed on any single property or on our portfolio as a whole.

We consider a number of factors when evaluating our level of indebtedness and when making decisions regarding the incurrence of indebtedness, including the purchase price of properties to be acquired with debt financing, the estimated market value of our properties upon refinancing and the ability of particular properties and the Company as a whole to generate cash flow to cover expected debt service.

Working Capital Reserves

We will maintain working capital reserves (and when not sufficient, access to borrowings) in amounts that our management determines to be adequate to meet normal contingencies in connection with our business and investments.

Policies with Respect to Other Activities

We expect to issue additional common and preferred shares of beneficial interest in the future and may authorize our Operating Partnership to issue additional common and preferred units of limited partnership interest, including to persons who contribute their direct or indirect interests in properties to us in exchange for such units. We have not engaged in trading, underwriting or agency distribution or sale of securities of unaffiliated issuers and we do not intend to do so. At all times, we intend to make investments in such a manner as to maintain our qualification as a REIT, unless because of circumstances or changes in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (or the Treasury Regulations), the Board of Trustees determines that it is no longer in the best interest of Brandywine Realty Trust to qualify as a REIT. We may make loans to third parties, including to joint ventures in which we participate. We intend to make investments in such a way that we will not be treated as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Our policies with respect to such activities may be reviewed and modified from time to time by the Board of Trustees.

Management Activities

We conduct our third-party real estate management services business through Brandywine Realty Services Corporation (the “Management Company”), a taxable REIT subsidiary, which performs management and leasing services for 39 properties owned by third-parties and certain of the Real Estate Ventures. We own a 95% interest of the Management Company. The remaining 5% of the Management Company is owned by a partnership comprised of a current executive and former executive of the Company, each of whom is a member of our Board of Trustees. As of December 31, 2004, the Management Company was managing properties containing an aggregate of approximately 22.7 million net rentable square feet, of which

-8-

Back to Contents

approximately 19.2 million net rentable square feet related to Properties owned by us and approximately 3.5 million net rentable square feet related to properties owned by third parties and certain of the Real Estate Ventures.

Geographic Segments

We currently manage our portfolio of Properties within five segments: (1) Pennsylvania—West, (2) Pennsylvania—North, (3) New Jersey, (4) Urban and (5) Virginia. The Pennsylvania—West segment includes properties in Chester, Delaware and Montgomery counties in the suburbs of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The Pennsylvania—North segment includes properties north of Philadelphia in Berks, Bucks, Cumberland, Dauphin, Lehigh and Montgomery counties. The New Jersey segment includes properties in Bucks County, Pennsylvania and counties in the southern part of New Jersey, including Burlington, Camden and Mercer counties. The Urban segment includes properties within the city of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and in the state of Delaware. The Virginia segment includes properties primarily in Albemarle, Chesterfield and Henrico counties, the City of Richmond and Durham, North Carolina.

Competition

The real estate business is highly competitive. Our Properties compete for tenants with similar properties primarily on the basis of location, total occupancy costs (including base rent and operating expenses), services provided, and the design and condition of the improvements. We also face competition when attempting to acquire or develop real estate, including competition from domestic and foreign financial institutions, other REIT’s, life insurance companies, pension funds, partnerships and individual investors. Additionally, our ability to compete depends upon, among other factors, trends in the economies of our markets, investment alternatives, financial condition and operating results of current and prospective tenants, availability and cost of capital, construction and renovation costs, land availability, satisfactory completion of construction approvals, taxes, governmental regulations, legislation and population trends.

Employees

As of December 31, 2004, we had 294 full-time employees, including 14 union employees.

Environmental Regulations

As an owner and operator of real estate, we are subject to various environmental laws of federal, state and local governments. Compliance with existing laws has not had a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations, and management does not believe it will have such an impact in the future. However, we cannot predict the impact of unforeseen environmental contingencies or new or changed laws or regulations on our Properties, properties that we have sold or on properties that we may acquire in the future. See Item 1. Business- “Risk Factors - Environmental problems at the Properties are possible and may be costly.”

Other

We do not have any foreign operations and our business is not seasonal. Our operations are not dependent on a single tenant or a few tenants and no single tenant accounted for more than 10% of our total 2004 revenue.

Code of Conduct

We maintain a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to our Board and all of our officers and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, controller or persons performing similar functions. A copy of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on our website, www.brandywinerealty.com. In addition to being accessible through our website, copies of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics can be obtained, free of charge, upon written request to Investor Relations, 401 Plymouth Road, Suite 500, Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462. Any

-9-

Back to Contents

amendments to or waivers of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that apply to the principal executive officer, the principal financial officer, the principal accounting officer, the controller or persons performing similar functions and that relate to any matter enumerated in Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K will be disclosed on our website. The reference to our website address does not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained in the website and such information should not be considered to be part of this document.

Availability of SEC Reports

We file annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K and other information with the SEC. Members of the public may read and copy materials that we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. Members of the public may also obtain information on the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains an Internet web site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers, including us, that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that site is http://www.sec.gov. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K and other information filed by us with the SEC are available, without charge, on our Internet web site, http://www.brandywinerealty.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed electronically with the SEC. Copies are also available, without charge, from Secretary, Brandywine Realty Trust, 401 Plymouth Road, Suite 500, Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462.

Risk Factors

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a “safe harbor” for forward-looking statements. Certain information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and other materials filed by us with the SEC (as well as information included in oral statements or other written statements made or to be made by us) contain statements that are forward-looking, such as statements relating to business and real estate development activities, acquisitions, dispositions, future capital expenditures, financing sources and availability, and the effects of regulation (including environmental regulation) and competition. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that our expectations will be achieved. As forward-looking statements, these statements involve important risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the expected results and, accordingly, such results may differ from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of us. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations include, but are not limited to, changes in general economic conditions, changes in local real estate conditions (including changes in rental rates and the number of competing properties), changes in the economic conditions affecting industries in which our principal tenants compete, our failure to lease unoccupied space in accordance with our projections, our failure to re-lease occupied space upon expiration of leases, the bankruptcy of major tenants, changes in prevailing interest rates, the unavailability of equity and debt financing, unanticipated costs associated with the acquisition and integration of our acquisitions, unanticipated costs to complete and lease-up pending developments, increased costs for, or lack of availability of, adequate insurance, including for terrorist acts, demand for tenant services beyond those traditionally provided by landlords, potential liability under environmental or other laws, the existence of complex regulations relating to our status as a REIT and to our acquisition, disposition and development activities, the adverse consequences of our failure to qualify as a REIT and the other risks identified in this “Risk Factors” section and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Given these uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. We assume no obligation to update or supplement forward-looking statements that become untrue because of subsequent events.

Our performance is subject to risks associated with our Properties and with the real estate industry.

Our economic performance and the value of our real estate assets, and consequently the value of our securities, are subject to the risk that if our Properties do not generate revenues sufficient to meet our operating expenses, including debt service and capital expenditures, our cash flow and ability to pay

-10-

Back to Contents

distributions to our shareholders will be adversely affected. Events or conditions beyond our control that may adversely affect our operations or the value of our Properties include:

	•	downturns in the national, regional and local economic climate;

	•	competition from other office, industrial and commercial buildings;

	•	local real estate market conditions, such as oversupply or reduction in demand for office, or other commercial or industrial space;

	•	changes in interest rates and availability of financing;

	•	vacancies, changes in market rental rates and the need to periodically repair, renovate and re-lease space;

	•	increased operating costs, including insurance expense, utilities, real estate taxes, state and local taxes and heightened security costs;

	•	civil disturbances, earthquakes and other natural disasters, or terrorist acts or acts of war which may result in uninsured or underinsured losses;

	•	significant expenditures associated with each investment, such as debt service payments, real estate taxes, insurance and maintenance costs which are generally not reduced when circumstances cause a reduction in revenues from a property; and

	•	declines in the financial condition of our tenants and our ability to collect rents from our tenants.

Our performance is dependent upon the economic conditions of the Mid-Atlantic markets in which our Properties are located.

Our properties are located primarily in and around Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Wilmington, Delaware; Southern and Central New Jersey; and Richmond, Virginia. Because our Properties are not dispersed throughout a broad geographic area and nearly all of our revenues are derived from these core Mid-Atlantic markets, we are especially sensitive to adverse economic developments in any of these regions. Like other real estate markets, these markets have experienced economic downturns in the past, and have recently experienced a downturn similar to the broader economic slowdown in the U.S. Such a downturn can lead to lower occupancy rates and, consequently, downward pressure on rental rates. Difficult economic conditions can also cause companies to experience difficulty with their cash flow, which might cause them to delay or miss making their lease payments, or result in their insolvency or bankruptcy. Furthermore, such a climate might affect the timing of lease commitments by new tenants or lease renewals by existing tenants, as such parties delay or defer their leasing decisions in order to get the most current information possible about trends in their businesses or industries. A prolonged decline in the economies of one or more of our core real estate markets, or in the U.S. economy as a whole, could adversely affect our financial position, results of operations, cash flow and ability to make distributions to shareholders.

We may experience increased operating costs, which might reduce our profitability.

Our Properties are subject to increases in operating expenses such as for cleaning, electricity, heating, ventilation and air conditioning, administrative costs and other costs associated with security, landscaping and repairs and maintenance of our Properties. In general, under our leases with tenants, we pass on all or a portion of these costs to them. We cannot assure you, however, that tenants will actually bear the full burden of these higher costs, or that such increased costs will not lead them, or other prospective tenants, to seek office space elsewhere. If operating expenses increase, the availability of other comparable office space in our core geographic markets might limit our ability to increase rents; if operating expenses increase

-11-

Back to Contents

without a corresponding increase in revenues, our profitability could diminish and limit our ability to make distributions to shareholders.

Our investment in property development or redevelopment may be more costly than we anticipate.

We intend to continue to develop properties where market conditions warrant such investment. As of December 31, 2004, we had six projects in development or redevelopment, including our construction of the Cira Centre in Philadelphia’s University City district. We expect our total investment in these developments to be approximately $221.3 million, of which $112.3 million had been incurred as of December 31, 2004.

Once made, our investments may not produce results in accordance with our expectations. Risks associated with our current and future development and construction activities include:

	•	the unavailability of favorable financing alternatives in the private and public debt markets;

	•	construction costs exceeding original estimates due to rising interest rates and increases in the costs of materials and labor;

	•	construction and lease-up delays resulting in increased debt service, fixed expenses and construction or renovation costs;

	•	expenditure of funds and devotion of management’s time to projects that we do not complete;

	•	occupancy rates and rents at newly completed properties may fluctuate depending on a number of factors, including market and economic conditions, resulting in lower than projected rental rates and a corresponding lower return on our investment; and

	•	complications (including building moratoriums and anti-growth legislation) in obtaining necessary zoning, occupancy and other governmental permits.

For additional information on development risks, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Overview – Development Risk.”

We face risks associated with property acquisitions.

We have in the past acquired, and intend in the future to acquire, properties and portfolios of properties, including large portfolios that would increase our size and potentially alter our capital structure. We completed one such transaction in the third quarter of 2004 with our acquisition of a portfolio of 14 office properties located in Pennsylvania and Delaware for a purchase price of approximately $600 million which we financed through a combination of debt and equity issuances. Although we believe that our purchase of this office portfolio and other acquisitions that we have completed in the past and that we expect to undertake in the future have and will enhance our future financial performance, the success of such transactions is subject to a number of factors, including the risk that:

	•	we may not be able to obtain financing for acquisitions on favorable terms;

	•	acquired properties may fail to perform as expected;

	•	the actual costs of repositioning or redeveloping acquired properties may be higher than our estimates;

	•	acquired properties may be located in new markets where we may have limited knowledge and understanding of the local economy, an absence of business relationships in the area or unfamiliarity with local governmental and permitting procedures; and

-12-

Back to Contents

•

we may not be able to efficiently integrate acquired properties, particularly portfolios of properties, into our organization and to manage new properties in a way that allows us to realize cost savings and synergies.

Acquired properties may subject us to unknown liabilities.

Properties that we acquire may be subject to unknown liabilities for which we would have no recourse, or only limited recourse, to the former owners of such properties. As a result, if a liability were asserted against us based upon ownership of an acquired property, we might be required to pay significant sums to settle it, which could adversely affect our financial results and cash flow. Unknown liabilities relating to acquired properties could include:

	•	liabilities for clean-up of undisclosed environmental contamination;

	•	claims by tenants, vendors or other persons arising on account of actions or omissions of the former owners of the properties; and

	•	liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of business.

We have agreed not to sell certain of our Properties.

We have agreed not to sell several of our Properties, including all 14 of the TRC Properties that we acquired in the third quarter of 2004, for varying periods of time, in transactions that would trigger taxable income to their former owners, and we may enter into similar arrangements as a part of future property acquisitions. Some of these tax protection agreements are with affiliates of one of our current trustees. These agreements generally provide that we may dispose of the subject Properties only in transactions that qualify as tax-free exchanges under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”) or in other tax deferred transactions. Such transactions can be difficult to complete and can result in the property acquired in exchange for the disposed of property inheriting the tax attributes (including tax protection covenants) of the disposed of property. Violation of these tax protection agreements would impose significant costs on us. As a result, we will be restricted with respect to decisions such as financing, encumbering, expanding or selling these Properties.

We may be unable to renew leases or re-lease space as leases expire.

If tenants do not to renew their leases upon expiration, we may be unable to re-lease the space. Even if the tenants do renew their leases or if we can re-lease the space, the terms of renewal or re-leasing (including the cost of required renovations) may be less favorable than current lease terms. Certain leases grant the tenants an early termination right upon payment of a termination penalty. For additional detail on the risk of non-renewal of expiring leases, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Overview – Tenant Rollover Risk.”

We face significant competition from other real estate developers.

We compete with real estate developers, operators and institutions for tenants and acquisition and development opportunities. Some of these competitors have significantly greater financial resources than we do. Such competition may reduce the number of suitable investment opportunities offered to us, may interfere with our ability to attract and retain tenants and may increase vacancies, which could result in increased supply and lower market rental rates, reducing our bargaining leverage and adversely affecting our ability to improve our operating leverage. In addition, some of our competitors may be willing, because their properties may have vacancy rates higher than those for our Properties, to make space available at lower prices than available space in our Properties. We cannot assure you that this competition will not adversely affect our cash flow and ability to make distributions to shareholders.

-13-

Back to Contents

Property ownership through joint ventures may limit our ability to act exclusively in our interests.

We intend to develop and acquire properties in joint ventures with other persons or entities when we believe circumstances warrant the use of such structures. We currently have investments in nine unconsolidated Real Estate Ventures and two additional real estate ventures that are consolidated in our financial statements. Our investments in these 11 ventures aggregated approximately $14.9 million (net of returns of investment amounts) as of December 31, 2004. We could become engaged in a dispute with one or more of our joint venture partners that might affect our ability to operate a jointly-owned property. Moreover, our joint venture partners may, at any time, have business, economic or other objectives that are inconsistent with our objectives, including objectives that relate to the appropriate timing and terms of any sale or refinancing of a property. In some instances, our joint venture partners may have competing interests in our markets that could create conflicts of interest. If the objectives of our joint venture partners are inconsistent with ours, we will not be able to act exclusively in our interests.

Because real estate is illiquid, we may not be able to sell Properties when appropriate.

Real estate investments generally, and in particular large office and industrial properties like those that we own, often cannot be sold quickly. Consequently, we may not be able to alter our portfolio promptly in response to changes in economic or other conditions. In addition, the Code limits our ability to sell Properties that we have held for fewer than four years without resulting in adverse consequences to our shareholders. Furthermore, Properties that we developed and have owned for a significant period of time or that we acquired in exchange for partnership interests in the Operating Partnership often have a low tax basis. If we were to dispose of any of these Properties in a taxable transaction, we may be required under provisions of the Code applicable to REITs to distribute a significant amount of the taxable gain to our shareholders and this could, in turn, impact our cash flow and ability to make distributions to shareholders. In some cases, tax protection agreements prevent us from selling certain Properties without incurring substantial costs (see “Risk Factors-We have agreed not to sell certain of our Properties” above). In addition, purchase options and rights of first refusal held by tenants or partners in joint ventures may also limit our ability to sell certain Properties. All of these factors reduce our ability to respond to changes in the performance of our investments and could adversely affect our cash flow and ability to make distributions to shareholders as well as the ability of someone to purchase us, even if a purchase were in our shareholders’ best interests.

We may suffer adverse consequences due to the financial difficulties, bankruptcy or insolvency of our tenants.

If one or more of our tenants were to experience financial difficulties, including bankruptcy, insolvency or a general downturn of business, there could be an adverse effect on our financial performance and distributions to shareholders. We cannot assure you that any tenant that files for bankruptcy protection will continue to pay us rent. A bankruptcy filing by or relating to one of our tenants or a lease guarantor would bar all efforts by us to collect pre-bankruptcy debts from that tenant or lease guarantor, or their property, unless we receive an order permitting us to do so from the bankruptcy court. In addition, we cannot evict a tenant solely because of its bankruptcy. The bankruptcy of a tenant or lease guarantor could delay our efforts to collect past due balances under the relevant leases, and could ultimately preclude collection of these sums. If a lease is assumed by the tenant in bankruptcy, all pre-bankruptcy balances due under the lease must be paid to us in full. If, however, a lease is rejected by a tenant in bankruptcy, we would have only a general unsecured claim for damages. Any such unsecured claim would only be paid only to the extent that funds are available and only in the same percentage as is paid to all other holders of unsecured claims; restrictions under the bankruptcy laws further limit the amount of any other claims that we can make if a lease is rejected. As a result, it is likely that we would recover substantially less than the full value of any such unsecured claims that we might hold. For additional detail on tenant credit risk, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Overview – Tenant Credit Risk.”

Some potential losses are not covered by insurance.

We carry comprehensive liability, fire, extended coverage and rental loss insurance on all of our Properties. We believe the policy specifications and insured limits of these policies are adequate and appropriate.

-14-

Back to Contents

There are, however, types of losses, such as lease and other contract claims and terrorism and acts of war, that generally are not insured. We cannot assure you that we will be able to renew insurance coverage in an adequate amount or at reasonable prices. In addition, insurance companies may no longer offer coverage against certain types of losses, such as losses due to terrorist acts and mold, or, if offered, these types of insurance may be prohibitively expensive. Should an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occur, we could lose all or a portion of the capital we have invested in a Property, as well as the anticipated future revenue from the Property. In such an event, we might nevertheless remain obligated for any mortgage debt or other financial obligations related to the Property. We cannot assure you that material losses in excess of insurance proceeds will not occur in the future. If any of our Properties were to experience a catastrophic loss, it could seriously disrupt our operations, delay revenue and result in large expenses to repair or rebuild the Property. Such events could adversely affect our cash flow and ability to make distributions to shareholders.

Terrorist attacks and other acts of violence or war may adversely impact our performance and may affect the markets on which our securities are traded.

Terrorist attacks against our Properties, or against the United States or its interests, may negatively impact our operations and the value of our securities. Attacks or armed conflicts could result in increased operating costs; for example, it might cost more in the future for building security, property/casualty and liability insurance, and property maintenance. Following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, we increased the level of security at our Properties and we continue to reevaluate our security infrastructure. As a result of terrorist activities and other market conditions, the cost of insurance coverage for our Properties could also increase. We might not be able to pass along the increased costs associated with such increased security measures and insurance to our tenants, which could reduce our profitability and cash flow. Furthermore, any terrorist attacks or armed conflicts could result in increased volatility in or damage to the United States and worldwide financial markets and economy. Such adverse economic conditions could affect the ability of our tenants to pay rent, which could have a negative impact on our results.

Our ability to make distributions is subject to various risks.

Historically, we have paid quarterly distributions to our shareholders. Our ability to make distributions in the future will depend upon:

	•	the operational and financial performance of our Properties;

	•	capital expenditures with respect to existing and newly acquired Properties;

	•	general and administrative costs associated with our operation as a publicly-held REIT;

	•	the amount of, and the interest rates on, our debt; and

	•	the absence of significant expenditures relating to environmental and other regulatory matters.

Certain of these matters are beyond our control and any significant difference between our expectations and actual results could have a material adverse effect on our cash flow and our ability to make distributions to shareholders.

Changes in the law may adversely affect our cash flow.

Because increases in income and service taxes are generally not passed through to tenants under leases, such increases may adversely affect our cash flow and ability to make expected distributions to shareholders. The Properties are also subject to various regulatory requirements, such as those relating to the environment, fire and safety. Our failure to comply with these requirements could result in the imposition of fines and damage awards and default under some of our tenant leases. Moreover, the costs to comply with any new or different regulations could adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to make distributions. Although we believe that the Properties are currently in material compliance with all such

-15-

Back to Contents

requirements, we cannot assure you that these requirements will not change or that newly imposed requirements will not require significant unanticipated expenditures.

The terms and covenants relating to our existing indebtedness could adversely impact our economic performance.

Like other real estate companies which incur debt, we are subject to risks normally associated with debt financing, such as the insufficiency of cash flow to meet required debt service payment obligations and the inability to refinance existing indebtedness. If our debt cannot be paid, refinanced or extended at maturity, in addition to our failure to repay our debt, we may not be able to make distributions to shareholders at expected levels or at all. Furthermore, an increase in our interest expense could adversely affect our cash flow and ability to make distributions to shareholders. If we do not meet our debt service obligations, any Properties securing such indebtedness could be foreclosed on, which would have a material adverse effect on our cash flow and ability to make distributions and, depending on the number of Properties foreclosed on, could threaten our continued viability.

Our credit facility and the indenture governing our unsecured debt securities contain customary restrictions, requirements and other limitations on our ability to incur indebtedness, including total debt to asset ratios, secured debt to total asset ratios, debt service coverage ratios and minimum ratios of unencumbered assets to unsecured debt which we must maintain. Our continued ability to borrow under our credit facility is subject to our compliance with such financial and other covenants. In the event that we would fail to satisfy these covenants, we would be in default under the credit facility and indenture, and may be required to repay such debt with capital from other sources. Under such circumstances, other sources of capital may not be available to us, or be available only on unattractive terms.

As of December 31, 2004, we had outstanding borrowings of approximately $173.2 million bearing interest at variable rates. Increases in interest rates on variable rate indebtedness would increase our interest expense, which could adversely affect our cash flow and ability to make distributions to shareholders. Rising interest rates could also restrict our ability to refinance existing debt when it matures. In addition, an increase in interest rates could decrease the amounts that third parties are willing to pay for our assets, thereby limiting our ability to alter our portfolio promptly in relation to economic or other conditions. We may, from time to time, enter into agreements such as interest rate hedges, swaps, floors, caps and other interest rate hedging contracts with respect to a portion of our variable rate debt. Although these agreements may lessen the impact of rising interest rates on us, they also expose us to the risk that other parties to the agreements will not perform or that we cannot enforce the agreements.

Our degree of leverage could limit our ability to obtain additional financing or affect the market price of our common shares or debt securities.

Our degree of leverage could affect our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital expenditures, development, acquisitions or other general corporate purposes. Our senior unsecured debt is currently rated investment grade by the three major rating agencies. We cannot, however, assure you that we will be able to maintain this rating. In the event that our senior unsecured debt was downgraded from its current rating, we would likely incur higher borrowing costs and the market prices of our common shares and debt securities might decline. Our degree of leverage could also make us more vulnerable to a downturn in business or the economy generally.

Additional issuances of equity securities may be dilutive to current shareholders.

The interests of our current shareholders could be diluted if we issue additional equity securities to finance future developments or acquisitions or to repay indebtedness. Our Board of Trustees may issue additional equity securities without shareholder approval. Our ability to execute our business strategy depends upon our access to an appropriate blend of debt financing, including unsecured lines of credit and other forms of secured and unsecured debt, and equity financing, including the issuance of common and preferred equity.

-16-

Back to Contents

Environmental problems at the Properties are possible and may be costly.

Federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations may require a current or previous owner or operator of real estate to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances or releases at such property. The owner or operator may be forced to pay for property damage and for investigation and clean-up costs incurred by others in connection with environmental contamination. Such laws typically impose clean-up responsibility and liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of or caused the presence of the contaminants. Even if more than one person may have been responsible for the contamination, each person subject to the environmental laws may be held responsible for all of the clean-up costs incurred. In addition, third parties may sue the owner or operator of a site for damages and costs resulting from environmental contamination emanating from that site. These costs may be substantial and the presence of such substances may adversely affect the owner’s ability to sell or rent such property or to borrow using such property as collateral.

Environmental laws that govern the presence, maintenance and removal of asbestos require that owners or operators of buildings containing asbestos properly manage and maintain the asbestos, notify and train those who may come into contact with asbestos and undertake special precautions, including removal or other abatement, if asbestos would be disturbed during renovation or demolition of a building. Such laws may impose fines and penalties on building owners or operators who fail to comply with these requirements and may allow third parties to seek recovery from owners or operators for personal injury associated with exposure to asbestos fibers.

Independent environmental consultants have conducted a standard Phase I or similar general environmental site assessment (“ESA”) for each of our Properties to identify potential sources of environmental contamination and assess environmental regulatory compliance. For a number of our Properties, the Phase I ESA either referenced a prior Phase II ESA obtained on such Property or prompted us to have a Phase II ESA of such Property conducted. A Phase II ESA generally involves invasive procedures, such as soil sampling and testing or the installation and monitoring of groundwater wells. Although the ESAs that have been conducted identified environmental contamination on a few of our Properties, they have not revealed any environmental contamination, liability or compliance concern that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our cash flow or ability to make distributions to shareholders. It is possible that the existing ESAs of our Properties do not reveal all environmental contaminations, liabilities or compliance concerns which currently exist, and it is also possible that the cost of remediating identified contamination may exceed current estimates. In addition, future properties which we acquire may be subject to environmental conditions.

Although we have an ongoing maintenance program in place to address indoor air quality, inquiries about indoor air quality may necessitate special investigation and, depending upon the results, remediation. Indoor air quality issues can stem from inadequate ventilation, chemical contaminants from indoor or outdoor sources, and biological contaminants such as molds, pollen, viruses and bacteria. Indoor exposure to chemical or biological contaminants above certain levels has been alleged to be connected to allergic reactions or other health effects and symptoms in susceptible individuals. If these conditions occur at one of our Properties, we may need to undertake a targeted remediation program, including without limitation, taking steps to increase indoor ventilation rates and eliminate sources of contaminants. Such remediation programs are costly and could necessitate the temporary relocation of some or all of the affected Property’s tenants or require rehabilitation of that Property.

Americans with Disabilities Act compliance could be costly.

The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”) requires that all public accommodations and commercial facilities, including office buildings, meet certain federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. Compliance with ADA requirements could involve the removal of structural barriers from certain disabled persons’ entrances which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Other federal, state and local laws may require modifications to or restrict further renovations of our Properties with respect to such accesses. Although we believe that our Properties are currently in material compliance with present requirements, noncompliance with the ADA or similar or related laws or regulations could result in the United States government imposing fines or private litigants being awarded damages against us. In addition, we do not know whether existing requirements will change or whether

-17-

Back to Contents

compliance with future requirements will require significant unanticipated expenditures. Such costs may adversely affect our cash flow and ability to make distributions to shareholders.

Our status as a REIT is dependent on compliance with federal income tax requirements.

Our failure to qualify as a REIT would have serious adverse consequences to our shareholders. We believe that since 1986, we have qualified for taxation as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. We plan to continue to meet the requirements for taxation as a REIT. Many of these requirements are highly technical and complex. The determination that we are a REIT requires an analysis of various factual matters and circumstances that may not be totally within our control. For example, to qualify as a REIT, at least 95% of our gross income must come from certain sources that are itemized in the REIT tax laws. We are also required to distribute to shareholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (excluding net capital gains). The fact that we hold our assets through the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries further complicates the application of the REIT requirements. Even a technical or inadvertent mistake could jeopardize our REIT status. For taxable years beginning in 2005 or thereafter, we may in some circumstances avoid the loss of REIT status, but we may be required to pay a substantial fine if we fail to comply with REIT requirements. Furthermore, Congress and the IRS might change the tax laws and regulations, and the courts might issue new rulings that make it more difficult, or impossible, for us to remain qualified as a REIT. We do not believe, however, that any pending or proposed tax law changes would jeopardize our REIT status. Furthermore, Congress and the IRS might change the tax laws and regulations, and the courts might issue new rulings that make it more difficult, or impossible, for us to remain qualified as a REIT. We do not believe, however, that any pending or proposed tax law changes would jeopardize our REIT status. To maintain REIT status, a REIT may not own more than 10% of the securities of any corporation, except for a qualified REIT subsidiary (which must be wholly owned by the REIT), taxable REIT subsidiary or another REIT.

If we fail to qualify as a REIT, we would be subject to federal income tax at regular corporate rates. Also, unless the IRS granted us relief under certain statutory provisions, we would remain disqualified as a REIT for four years following the year we first failed to qualify. If we failed to qualify as a REIT, we would be required to pay significant income taxes and would, therefore, have less money available for investments or for distributions to shareholders. This would likely have a material adverse effect on the value of our securities. In addition, we would no longer be required to make any distributions to shareholders.

In order to make the distributions required to maintain our REIT status, we may need to borrow funds. To obtain the favorable tax treatment associated with REIT qualification, we generally are required to distribute to shareholders at least 90% of our annual REIT taxable income (excluding net capital gains). In addition, we are subject to tax on our undistributed net taxable income and net capital gain and a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the amount, if any, by which certain distributions paid by us with respect to any calendar year are less than the sum of 85% of ordinary income plus 95% of capital gain net income for the calendar year, plus certain undistributed amounts from prior years.

We intend to make distributions to shareholders to comply with the distribution provisions of the Code and to avoid income and other taxes. Our income consists primarily of our share of the income of the Operating Partnership and our cash flow consists primarily of our share of distributions from the Operating Partnership. Differences in timing between the receipt of income and the payment of expenses in arriving at taxable income (of the Company or the Operating Partnership) and the effect of required debt amortization payments could require us to borrow funds on a short-term basis or to liquidate funds on adverse terms to meet the REIT qualification distribution requirements.

Failure of the Operating Partnership (or a subsidiary partnership) to be treated as a partnership would have serious adverse consequences to our shareholders. If the IRS were to successfully challenge the tax status of the Operating Partnership or any of its subsidiary partnerships for federal income tax purposes, the Operating Partnership or the affected subsidiary partnership would be taxable as a corporation. In such event, we would cease to qualify as a REIT and the imposition of a corporate tax on the Operating Partnership or a subsidiary partnership would reduce the amount of cash available for distribution from the Operating Partnership to us and ultimately to our shareholders.

-18-

Back to Contents

Even if we qualify as a REIT, we are required to pay certain federal, state and local taxes on our income and Properties. In addition, our taxable REIT subsidiaries, including the Management Company, are subject to federal, state and local income tax at regular corporate rates on their net taxable income derived from management, leasing and related service business. If we have net income from a prohibited transaction, such income will be subject to a 100% tax.

One of our subsidiaries, Atlantic American Properties Trust (“AAPT”), that indirectly holds 22 of our Properties, elected to be taxed as a REIT for the year ended December 31, 1997. So long as we seek to maintain AAPT’s REIT status, AAPT will be subject to all the requirements and risks associated with maintaining REIT status summarized above, including the limitation on the ownership of more than 10% of the securities of any corporation (other than a qualified REIT subsidiary, taxable REIT subsidiary or another REIT).

We are dependent upon our key personnel.

We are dependent upon our key personnel whose continued service is not guaranteed. We are dependent on our executive officers for strategic business direction and real estate experience. Although we believe that we could find replacements for these key personnel, loss of their services could adversely affect our operations. Although we have an employment agreement with Gerard H. Sweeney, our President and Chief Executive Officer, for a term extending to May 7, 2008, this agreement does not restrict his ability to become employed by a competitor following the termination of his employment. We do not have key man life insurance coverage on our executive officers.

Certain limitations exist with respect to a third party’s ability to acquire us or effectuate a change in control.

Limitations imposed to protect our REIT status. In order to protect us against the loss of our REIT status, our Declaration of Trust limits any shareholder from owning more than 9.8% in value of our outstanding shares, subject to certain exceptions. The ownership limit may have the effect of precluding acquisition of control of the Company. If anyone acquires shares in excess of the ownership limit, we may:

	•	consider the transfer to be null and void;

	•	not reflect the transaction on our books;

	•	institute legal action to stop the transaction;

	•	not pay dividends or other distributions with respect to those shares;

	•	not recognize any voting rights for those shares; and

	•	consider the shares held in trust for the benefit of a person to whom such shares may be transferred.

Limitation due to our ability to issue preferred shares. Our Declaration of Trust authorizes the Board of Trustees to issue preferred shares, without limitation as to amount. The Board of Trustees may establish the preferences and rights of any preferred shares issued which could have the effect of delaying or preventing someone from taking control of us, even if a change in control were in our shareholders’ best interests.

Limitation imposed by the Maryland Business Combination Law. The Maryland General Corporation Law, as applicable to Maryland REITs, establishes special restrictions against “business combinations” between a Maryland REIT and “interested shareholders” or their affiliates unless an exemption is applicable. An interested shareholder includes a person who beneficially owns, and an affiliate or associate of the trust who, at any time within the two-year period prior to the date in question, was the beneficial owner of, ten percent or more of the voting power of our then-outstanding voting shares. Among other things, Maryland law prohibits (for a period of five years) a merger and certain other transactions between us and an

-19-

Back to Contents

interested shareholder unless the Board of Trustees had approved the transaction before the party became an interested shareholder. The five-year period runs from the most recent date on which the interested shareholder became an interested shareholder. Thereafter, any such business combination must be recommended by the Board of Trustees and approved by two super-majority shareholder votes unless, among other conditions, our common shareholders receive a minimum price for their shares and the consideration is received in cash or in the same form as previously paid by the interested shareholder for its shares or unless the Board of Trustees approved the transaction before the party in question became an interested shareholder. The business combination statute could have the effect of discouraging offers to acquire us and of increasing the difficulty of consummating any such offers, even if our acquisition would be in our shareholders’ best interests. We have exempted any business combination involving Safeguard Scientifics, Inc., the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania State Employees’ Retirement System and a voting trust established for its benefit, Morgan Stanley Asset Management Inc. and two funds managed by it, Lazard Freres Real Estate Investors, L.L.C., Five Arrows Realty Securities III L.L.C., Gerard H. Sweeney and any of their respective affiliates or associates.

Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act. Maryland law provides that “control shares” of a REIT acquired in a “control share acquisition” shall have no voting rights except to the extent approved by a vote of two-thirds of the vote eligible to be cast on the matter under the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act. “Control Shares” means shares that, if aggregated with all other shares previously acquired by the acquirer, would entitle the acquirer to exercise voting power in electing trustees within one of the following ranges of voting power: one-tenth or more but less than one-third, one-third or more but less than a majority or a majority or more of all voting power. A “control share acquisition” means the acquisition of control shares, subject to certain exceptions. If voting rights or control shares acquired in a control share acquisition are not approved at a shareholder’s meeting, then subject to certain conditions and limitations the issuer may redeem any or all of the control shares for fair value. If voting rights of such control shares are approved at a shareholder’s meeting and the acquirer becomes entitled to vote a majority of the shares entitled to vote, all other shareholders may exercise appraisal rights. Any control shares acquired in a control share acquisition which are not exempt under our bylaws will be subject to the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act. Our bylaws contain a provision exempting from the control share acquisition statute any and all acquisitions by any person of our shares. We cannot assure you that this provision will not be amended or eliminated at any time in the future.

Many factors can have an adverse effect on the market value of our securities.

Like any publicly traded company, a number of factors might adversely affect the price of our securities, many of which are beyond our control. These factors include:

	•	increases in market interest rates, relative to the dividend yield on our shares. If market interest rates go up, prospective purchasers of our securities may require a higher yield. Higher market interest rates would not, however, result in more funds for us to distribute and, to the contrary, would likely increase our borrowing costs and potentially decrease funds available for distribution. Thus, higher market interest rates could cause the market price of our common shares to go down;

	•	anticipated benefit of an investment in our securities as compared to investment in securities of companies in other industries (including benefits associated with tax treatment of dividends and distributions);

	•	perception by market professionals of REITs generally and REITs comparable to us in particular;

	•	perception by market participants of our potential for payment of cash distributions and for growth;

	•	level of institutional investor interest in our securities;

-20-

Back to Contents

	•	relatively low trading volumes in securities of REITs;

	•	our results of operations and financial condition; and

	•	investor confidence in the stock market generally.

The market value of our Common Shares is based primarily upon the market’s perception of our growth potential and our current and potential future earnings and cash distributions. Consequently, our Common Shares may trade at prices that are higher or lower than our net asset value per Common Share. If our future earnings or cash distributions are less than expected, it is likely that the market price of our Common Shares will diminish.

The issuance of preferred securities may adversely affect the rights of holders of Common Shares.

Because our Board of Trustees has the power to establish the preferences and rights of each class or series of Preferred Shares, it may afford the holders in any series or class of preferred shares preferences, distributions, powers and rights, voting or otherwise, senior to the rights of holders of Common Shares. The Board of Trustees also has the power to establish the preferences and rights of each class or series of units in the Operating Partnership, and may afford the holders in any series or class of preferred units preferences, distributions, powers and rights, voting or otherwise, senior to the rights of holders of common units.

Item 2. Properties

Property Acquisitions

We acquired the following properties during the year ended December 31, 2004:

Month of Acquisition	Property/Portfolio Name		Location		# of Buildings		Rentable Square Feet/ Acres		Purchase Price

										(in 000’s)
Office Properties:
Jul-04		Five Greentree		Marlton, NJ		1		169,534	$	18,353
Sep-04		TRC Properties		Radnor/ Philadelphia/ Wilmington		14		3,511,267		600,000

		Total Office Properties Acquired				15		3,680,801	$	618,353

Land Parcels:
Sep-04		Newtown Land		Newtown, PA		—		58.4	$	4,500

		Total Land Acquired				—		58.4	$	4,500

The purchase price above does not include transaction costs. Regarding the TRC portfolio, the purchase price does not included a maximum of $9.7 million of additional Class A Units of the Operating Partnership that we agreed to issue if certain of the TRC Properties achieve at least 95% occupancy prior to September 21, 2007.

-21-

Back to Contents

Development Properties Placed in Service

We placed in service the following properties during the year ended December 31, 2004:

Month Placed
in Service

Property/Portfolio Name

Location

# of
Buildings

Rentable
Square Feet

Office Properties:

Jul-04

6990 Snowdrift Road (Bldg A)

Allentown, PA

44,200

Dec-04

7535 Windsor Drive.

Allentown, PA

128,061

Total Properties Placed in Service

172,261

We place a property under development in service once a property reaches 95% occupancy or one year after the completion of shell construction, whichever is earlier.

Property Sales and Dispositions

We sold or disposed of the following properties during the year ended December 31, 2004:

Month of Sale	Property/Portfolio Name		Location		# of Bldgs.		Rentable Square Feet/ Acres		Sales/Disposition Price

										(in 000’s)
Office Properties:
Mar-04		2201 Dabney Road		Richmond, VA		1		45,000	$	2,100
Mar-04		1255 Broad Street		Bloomfield, NJ		1		37,478		3,960
Jun-04		935 First Avenue		King of Prussia, PA		1		103,090		17,000
Dec-04		55 U.S. Avenue		Gibbsboro, NJ		1		138,982		5,550

		Total Office Properties Sold				4		324,550	$	28,610

Land Parcels:
May-04		Twin Hickory Land		Richmond, VA		—		5.3	$	1,242
Aug-04		East Gate Land		Mount Laurel, NJ		—		19.4		1,300
Sep-04		Dabney Plot B Land		Richmond, VA		—		4.6		341

		Total Land Sold				—		29.3	$	2,883

The above tables exclude a purchase and sale of a land parcel totaling 93 acres in two separate transactions with unrelated third parties. The purchase and sale resulted in a net gain of approximately $1.5 million.

Properties

As of December 31, 2004, we owned 222 office properties, 23 industrial facilities and one mixed-use property that contained an aggregate of approximately 19.2 million net rentable square feet. The properties are located in the markets in and surrounding Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Wilmington, Delaware; Southern and Central New Jersey; and Richmond, Virginia. As of December 31, 2004, the Properties were approximately 92.7% leased to 1,179 tenants and had an average age of approximately 16.8 years. The office properties are primarily two to three story suburban office buildings containing an average of approximately 80,071 net rentable square feet. The industrial properties accommodate a variety of tenant uses, including light manufacturing, assembly, distribution and warehousing. We carry comprehensive liability, fire, extended coverage and rental loss insurance covering all of the Properties, with policy specifications and insured limits which we believe are adequate.

-22-

Back to Contents

We had the following projects in development or redevelopment as of December 31, 2004:

Project Name	Location		Rentable Square Feet		% Leased as of 12/31/04			Estimated Project Completion Date		Projected In-Service Date (a)		Total Cost Incurred as of 12/31/04		Estimated Total Development Cost (b)

													(in 000’s)		(in 000’s)
Under Development:
Cira Centre		Philadelphia, PA		727,725		65	%		Dec-05		Dec-06	$	89,121	$	177,642
6990 Snowdrift (Bldg B)		Allentown, PA		27,900		0	%(c)		Jan-04		Jan-05		2,538		3,337
1400 Howard Blvd.		Mount Laurel, NJ		75,590		100	%		Aug-05		Sep-05		3,425		14,581
Bishops Gate		Mount Laurel, NJ		52,986		94	%		Jul-04		Jul-05		7,550		8,253

				884,201									102,634		203,813

Under Redevelopment:
855 Springdale Drive		West Whiteland, PA		50,750		0	%		Sep-05		Sep-06		200		4,678
501 Office Center Drive		Fort Washington, PA		114,778		35	%		Oct-04		Oct-05		9,479		12,795

				165,528									9,679		17,473

				1,049,729								$	112,313	$	221,286

(a)	Projected in-service date represents the earlier of (a) the date at which the property is estimated to be 95% occupied or (b) one year from the project completion date.
(b)	Total development cost includes land acquisition costs, land carry costs, hard and soft construction costs, tenant improvements and broker commissions.
(c)	A lease was signed in February 2005 for 27,900 square feet that commences in June 2005.

The following table sets forth information with respect to the Properties at December 31, 2004:

-23-

Back to Contents

Property Name		Location		State		Year Built		Net Rentable Square Feet		Percentage Leased as of December 31, 2004 (a)			Total Base Rent for the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2004 (b) (000’s)		Average Annualized Rental Rate as of December 31, 2004 (c)

PENNSYLVANIA NORTH SEGMENT
100-300 Gundy Drive			Reading		PA		1970		452,918		99.9	%	$	7,000	$	15.63
401 Plymouth Road			Plymouth Meeting		PA		2001		201,528		100.0	%		5,541		30.36
300 Corporate Center Drive			Camp Hill		PA		1989		175,280		37.6	%		2,645		16.66
111 Presidential Boulevard			Bala Cynwyd		PA		1997		172,654		82.2	%		1,933		14.09
100 Katchel Blvd			Reading		PA		1970		131,082		100.0	%		2,960		21.67
7535 Windsor Drive			Allentown		PA		1988		128,061		54.5	%		995		16.22
501 Office Center Drive	(e)		Fort Washington		PA		1974		114,778		—			—		—
7130 Ambassador Drive	(i)		Allentown		PA		1991		114,049		100.0	%		88		—
7350 Tilghman Street			Allentown		PA		1987		111,500		100.0	%		1,976		19.81
181 Washington Street	(h)		Conshohocken		PA		1999		108,456		94.4	%		2,911		32.90
920 Harvest Drive			Blue Bell		PA		1990		104,505		100.0	%		2,100		20.87
500 Office Center Drive			Fort Washington		PA		1974		101,303		83.9	%		1,728		22.34
7450 Tilghman Street			Allentown		PA		1986		100,000		81.2	%		1,403		19.69
620 West Germantown Pike			Plymouth Meeting		PA		1990		90,169		95.1	%		2,006		28.32
610 West Germantown Pike			Plymouth Meeting		PA		1987		90,152		100.0	%		2,445		31.42
630 West Germantown Pike			Plymouth Meeting		PA		1988		89,925		86.2	%		1,787		19.47
600 West Germantown Pike			Plymouth Meeting		PA		1986		89,681		97.8	%		2,161		30.25
200 Barr Harbour Drive	(h)		Conshohocken		PA		1998		86,422		95.1	%		2,267		31.25
3331 Street Road -Greenwood Square			Bensalem		PA		1986		81,575		100.0	%		1,686		21.53
One Progress Avenue			Horsham		PA		1986		79,204		100.0	%		841		11.60
323 Norristown Road			Lower Gwyned		PA		1988		76,287		97.1	%		1,486		17.53
160 - 180 West Germantown Pike			East Norriton		PA		1982		73,394		93.2	%		926		13.70
500 Enterprise Road			Horsham		PA		1990		66,751		100.0	%		588		11.90
925 Harvest Drive			Blue Bell		PA		1990		63,663		88.4	%		1,126		21.15
980 Harvest Drive			Blue Bell		PA		1988		62,379		100.0	%		1,442		25.68
3329 Street Road -Greenwood Square			Bensalem		PA		1985		60,705		89.0	%		978		20.75
200 Corporate Center Drive			Camp Hill		PA		1989		60,000		100.0	%		1,059		16.25
321 Norristown Road			Lower Gwyned		PA		1988		59,994		100.0	%		1,124		19.12
2240/50 Butler Pike			Plymouth Meeting		PA		1984		52,229		100.0	%		886		21.26
1155 Business Center Drive			Horsham		PA		1990		51,388		100.0	%		712		18.77
800 Business Center Drive			Horsham		PA		1986		51,236		100.0	%		598		15.33
7150 Windsor Drive			Allentown		PA		1988		49,420		100.0	%		595		13.66
520 Virginia Drive			Fort Washington		PA		1987		48,122		100.0	%		902		20.75
6575 Snowdrift Road			Allentown		PA		1988		47,091		100.0	%		568		13.95
220 Commerce Drive			Fort Washington		PA		1985		46,080		81.9	%		812		21.21
6990 Snowdrift Road (A)			Allentown		PA		2003		44,200		100.0	%		630		16.27
7248 Tilghman Street			Allentown		PA		1987		43,782		84.9	%		568		17.33
7360 Windsor Drive			Allentown		PA		2001		43,600		100.0	%		935		23.73
300 Welsh Road - Building I			Horsham		PA		1980		40,042		31.0	%		322		18.70
7310 Tilghman Street			Allentown		PA		1985		40,000		92.6	%		483		15.35
150 Corporate Center Drive			Camp Hill		PA		1987		39,401		92.0	%		661		17.93
755 Business Center Drive			Horsham		PA		1998		38,050		100.0	%		576		24.45
7010 Snowdrift Road			Allentown		PA		1991		33,029		80.6	%		438		16.91
2260 Butler Pike			Plymouth Meeting		PA		1984		31,892		100.0	%		565		20.76

Back to Contents

Property Name		Location		State		Year Built		Net Rentable Square Feet		Percentage Leased as of December 31, 2004 (a)			Total Base Rent for the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2004 (b) (000’s)		Average Annualized Rental Rate as of December 31, 2004 (c)

700 Business Center Drive			Horsham		PA		1986		30,773		100.0	%		350		11.29
120 West Germantown Pike			Plymouth Meeting		PA		1984		30,574		100.0	%		339		12.82
650 Dresher Road			Horsham		PA		1984		30,071		100.0	%		684		22.25
655 Business Center Drive			Horsham		PA		1997		29,849		100.0	%		376		18.52
630 Dresher Road			Horsham		PA		1987		28,894		100.0	%		689		24.47
140 West Germantown Pike			Plymouth Meeting		PA		1984		25,357		90.1	%		437		22.12
3333 Street Road -Greenwood Square			Bensalem		PA		1988		25,000		100.0	%		539		22.29
800 Corporate Circle Drive			Harrisburg		PA		1979		24,862		100.0	%		395		16.37
500 Nationwide Drive			Harrisburg		PA		1977		18,027		100.0	%		324		19.00
600 Corporate Circle Drive			Harrisburg		PA		1978		17,858		100.0	%		288		16.30
300 Welsh Road - Building II			Horsham		PA		1980		17,750		100.0	%		385		22.01
2404 Park Drive			Harrisburg		PA		1983		11,000		100.0	%		107		14.63
2401 Park Drive			Harrisburg		PA		1984		10,074		100.0	%		102		17.48
George Kachel Farmhouse			Reading		PA		2000		1,664		100.0	%		22		13.00
PENNSYLVANIA WEST SEGMENT
150 Radnor Chester Road	(f)		Radnor		PA		1983		339,544		—			—		—
201 King of Prussia Road	(f)		Radnor		PA		2001		251,372		—			—		—
555 Lancaster Avenue	(f)		Radnor		PA		1973		241,892		—			—		—
One Radnor Corporate Center			Radnor		PA		1998		185,166		94.0	%		1,457		32.56
Five Radnor Corporate Center			Radnor		PA		1998		164,577		78.9	%		1,289		34.86
Four Radnor Corporate Center			Radnor		PA		1995		163,517		74.9	%		629		16.93
751-761 Fifth Avenue			King Of Prussia		PA		1967		158,000		100.0	%		499		3.16
630 Allendale Road			King of Prussia		PA		2000		150,000		100.0	%		3,678		24.80
640 Freedom Business Center	(d)		King Of Prussia		PA		1991		132,000		92.0	%		3,109		26.95
52 Swedesford Square			East Whiteland Twp.		PA		1988		131,017		100.0	%		2,800		21.08
400 Berwyn Park			Berwyn		PA		1999		124,172		65.6	%		1,713		31.46
Three Radnor Corporate Center			Radnor		PA		1998		119,194		95.5	%		1,042		33.85
101 Lindenwood Drive			Malvern		PA		1988		118,121		96.2	%		2,515		21.38
300 Berwyn Park			Berwyn		PA		1989		109,919		80.1	%		1,906		22.81
50 Swedesford Square			East Whiteland Twp.		PA		1986		109,800		100.0	%		1,928		18.87
442 Creamery Way	(i)		Exton		PA		1991		104,500		100.0	%		598		6.64
Two Radnor Corporate Center			Radnor		PA		1998		100,973		67.1	%		609		32.10
301 Lindenwood Drive			Malvern		PA		1984		97,624		85.5	%		1,763		20.51
555 Croton Road			King of Prussia		PA		1999		96,909		97.3	%		2,732		30.58
500 North Gulph Road			King Of Prussia		PA		1979		93,082		82.8	%		1,396		19.93
630 Freedom Business Center	(d)		King Of Prussia		PA		1989		86,683		100.0	%		2,011		26.41
620 Freedom Business Center	(d)		King Of Prussia		PA		1986		86,570		72.7	%		796		23.21
1200 Swedsford Road			Berwyn		PA		1994		86,000		100.0	%		2,000		27.64
595 East Swedesford Road			Wayne		PA		1998		81,890		100.0	%		2,117		26.34
1050 Westlakes Drive			Berwyn		PA		1984		80,000		100.0	%		2,415		32.85
1060 First Avenue			King Of Prussia		PA		1987		77,718		51.9	%		871		21.76
741 First Avenue			King Of Prussia		PA		1966		77,184		100.0	%		580		8.00
1040 First Avenue			King Of Prussia		PA		1985		75,488		64.0	%		1,128		23.44
200 Berwyn Park			Berwyn		PA		1987		75,025		75.6	%		1,690		27.72
1020 First Avenue			King Of Prussia		PA		1984		74,556		100.0	%		1,642		22.03

Back to Contents

Property Name		Location		State		Year Built		Net Rentable Square Feet		Percentage Leased as of December 31, 2004 (a)			Total Base Rent for the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2004 (b) (000’s)		Average Annualized Rental Rate as of December 31, 2004 (c)

1000 First Avenue			King Of Prussia		PA		1980		74,139		100.0	%		1,598		23.43
436 Creamery Way			Exton		PA		1991		72,300		89.1	%		603		10.64
130 Radnor Chester Road	(f)		Radnor		PA		1983		69,548		—			—		—
14 Campus Boulevard			Newtown Square		PA		1998		69,542		100.0	%		1,460		23.42
170 Radnor Chester Road	(f)		Radnor		PA		1983		67,869		—			—		—
575 East Swedesford Road			Wayne		PA		1985		66,503		100.0	%		1,750		30.16
429 Creamery Way			Exton		PA		1996		63,420		100.0	%		760		14.03
610 Freedom Business Center	(d)		King Of Prussia		PA		1985		62,991		92.0	%		1,350		26.47
426 Lancaster Avenue			Devon		PA		1990		61,102		100.0	%		1,107		18.34
1180 Swedesford Road			Berwyn		PA		1987		60,371		100.0	%		1,728		29.74
1160 Swedesford Road			Berwyn		PA		1986		60,099		100.0	%		1,374		23.21
100 Berwyn Park			Berwyn		PA		1986		57,731		85.3	%		725		16.52
440 Creamery Way			Exton		PA		1991		57,218		100.0	%		517		12.04
640 Allendale Road	(i)		King of Prussia		PA		2000		56,034		100.0	%		350		8.16
565 East Swedesford Road			Wayne		PA		1984		55,789		76.8	%		1,094		28.79
650 Park Avenue			King Of Prussia		PA		1968		54,338		49.2	%		54		2.81
680 Allendale Road			King Of Prussia		PA		1962		52,528		100.0	%		544		12.27
486 Thomas Jones Way			Exton		PA		1990		51,372		82.7	%		791		17.68
855 Springdale Drive	(e)		Exton		PA		1986		50,750		—			—		—
660 Allendale Road	(i)		King of Prussia		PA		1962		50,635		100.0	%		365		8.86
15 Campus Boulevard			Newtown Square		PA		2002		50,000		100.0	%		1,338		26.43
875 First Avenue			King Of Prussia		PA		1966		50,000		100.0	%		1,038		19.16
630 Clark Avenue			King Of Prussia		PA		1960		50,000		100.0	%		301		7.17
620 Allendale Road			King Of Prussia		PA		1961		50,000		79.8	%		893		19.26
479 Thomas Jones Way			Exton		PA		1988		49,264		87.3	%		643		17.01
17 Campus Boulevard			Newtown Square		PA		2001		48,565		100.0	%		1,224		26.40
11 Campus Boulevard			Newtown Square		PA		1998		47,700		100.0	%		1,077		23.93
456 Creamery Way			Exton		PA		1987		47,604		100.0	%		364		7.87
110 Summit Drive			Exton		PA		1985		43,660		100.0	%		395		12.32
585 East Swedesford Road			Wayne		PA		1998		43,635		100.0	%		1,259		29.81
1100 Cassett Road			Berwyn		PA		1997		43,480		100.0	%		1,106		26.81
467 Creamery Way			Exton		PA		1988		42,000		100.0	%		521		16.94
1336 Enterprise Drive			West Goshen		PA		1989		39,330		100.0	%		796		21.00
600 Park Avenue			King Of Prussia		PA		1964		39,000		100.0	%		530		15.84
412 Creamery Way			Exton		PA		1999		38,098		77.3	%		508		8.87
18 Campus Boulevard			Newtown Square		PA		1990		37,374		100.0	%		758		22.42
457 Creamery Way			Exton		PA		1990		36,019		47.5	%		178		—
100 Arrandale Boulevard			Exton		PA		1997		34,931		100.0	%		550		19.52
300 Lindenwood Drive			Malvern		PA		1991		33,000		100.0	%		747		23.17
468 Thomas Jones Way			Exton		PA		1990		28,934		100.0	%		543		18.79
1700 Paoli Pike			Malvern		PA		2000		28,000		100.0	%		505		18.28
2490 Boulevard of the Generals			King Of Prussia		PA		1975		20,600		100.0	%		431		20.40
481 John Young Way			Exton		PA		1997		19,275		100.0	%		405		21.95
100 Lindenwood Drive			Malvern		PA		1985		18,400		100.0	%		255		9.00
748 Springdale Drive			Exton		PA		1986		13,950		100.0	%		256		19.32
200 Lindenwood Drive			Malvern		PA		1984		12,600		65.3	%		71		17.00

Back to Contents

Property Name		Location		State		Year Built		Net Rentable Square Feet		Percentage Leased as of December 31, 2004 (a)			Total Base Rent for the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2004 (b) (000’s)		Average Annualized Rental Rate as of December 31, 2004 (c)

111 Arrandale Road			Exton		PA		1996		10,479		100.0	%		191		23.64
NEW JERSEY SEGMENT
50 East State Street			Trenton		NJ		1989		305,884		92.3	%		5,195		27.07
1009 Lenox Drive			Lawrenceville		NJ		1989		180,460		96.0	%		4,674		26.83
10000 Midlantic Drive			Mt. Laurel		NJ		1990		179,098		100.0	%		3,028		23.75
525 Lincoln Drive West			Marlton		NJ		1986		169,534		68.9	%		1,007		21.58
33 West State Street			Trenton		NJ		1988		167,774		100.0	%		2,981		28.89
Main Street - Plaza 1000			Voorhees		NJ		1988		162,364		96.5	%		3,513		23.18
105 / 140 Terry Drive			Newtown		PA		1982		128,666		90.2	%		1,754		15.80
457 Haddonfield Road			Cherry Hill		NJ		1990		121,737		99.9	%		2,664		23.95
2000 Midlantic Drive			Mt. Laurel		NJ		1989		121,658		97.3	%		1,909		22.03
2000 Lenox Drive			Lawrenceville		NJ		2000		119,114		100.0	%		3,200		28.37
700 East Gate Drive			Mt. Laurel		NJ		1984		118,899		100.0	%		2,372		22.83
989 Lenox Drive			Lawrenceville		NJ		1984		112,055		96.6	%		2,712		28.70
993 Lenox Drive			Lawrenceville		NJ		1985		111,124		100.0	%		2,866		25.87
1000 Howard Boulevard			Mt. Laurel		NJ		1988		105,312		100.0	%		2,124		22.74
100 Brandywine Boulevard			Newtown		PA		2002		102,000		100.0	%		2,681		23.72
One South Union Place			Cherry Hill		NJ		1982		99,573		90.4	%		1,550		19.96
997 Lenox Drive			Lawrenceville		NJ		1987		97,277		100.0	%		2,335		25.05
1000 Atrium Way			Mt. Laurel		NJ		1989		97,158		62.6	%		1,564		23.17
1120 Executive Boulevard			Mt. Laurel		NJ		1987		95,278		100.0	%		2,081		25.86
15000 Midlantic Drive			Mt. Laurel		NJ		1991		84,056		96.5	%		1,476		23.02
220 Lake Drive East			Cherry Hill		NJ		1988		78,509		100.0	%		1,789		23.82
1007 Laurel Oak Road			Voorhees		NJ		1996		78,205		100.0	%		621		7.94
10 Lake Center Drive			Marlton		NJ		1989		76,359		100.0	%		1,701		23.90
200 Lake Drive East			Cherry Hill		NJ		1989		76,352		100.0	%		1,604		22.14
Three Greentree Centre			Marlton		NJ		1984		69,300		81.4	%		1,292		22.11
King & Harvard Avenue			Cherry Hill		NJ		1974		67,444		100.0	%		1,365		20.60
9000 Midlantic Drive			Mt. Laurel		NJ		1989		67,299		100.0	%		836		21.12
6 East Clementon Road			Gibbsboro		NJ		1980		66,236		92.7	%		1,015		16.96
701 East Gate Drive			Mt. Laurel		NJ		1986		61,794		100.0	%		1,102		21.12
210 Lake Drive East			Cherry Hill		NJ		1986		60,604		100.0	%		1,307		21.81
308 Harper Drive			Moorestown		NJ		1976		59,500		100.0	%		1,080		19.54
305 Fellowship Drive			Mt. Laurel		NJ		1980		56,824		100.0	%		1,117		24.55
Two Greentree Centre			Marlton		NJ		1983		56,075		100.0	%		1,039		21.96
309 Fellowship Drive			Mt. Laurel		NJ		1982		55,911		100.0	%		1,208		24.05
One Greentree Centre			Marlton		NJ		1982		55,838		95.7	%		987		21.30
8000 Lincoln Drive			Marlton		NJ		1997		54,923		67.1	%		720		20.84
307 Fellowship Drive			Mt. Laurel		NJ		1981		54,485		86.9	%		1,088		23.27
303 Fellowship Drive			Mt. Laurel		NJ		1979		53,848		99.9	%		904		21.23
1000 Lenox Drive			Lawrenceville		NJ		1982		52,264		100.0	%		1,656		23.25
2 Foster Avenue	(i)		Gibbsboro		NJ		1974		50,761		100.0	%		224		3.37
4000 Midlantic Drive			Mt. Laurel		NJ		1998		46,945		100.0	%		905		21.54
Five Eves Drive			Marlton		NJ		1986		45,564		100.0	%		767		18.33
161 Gaither Drive			Mount Laurel		NJ		1987		44,739		68.2	%		845		21.73

Back to Contents

Property Name		Location		State		Year Built		Net Rentable Square Feet		Percentage Leased as of December 31, 2004 (a)			Total Base Rent for the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2004 (b) (000’s)		Average Annualized Rental Rate as of December 31, 2004 (c)

Main Street - Piazza			Voorhees		NJ		1990		44,708		100.0	%		679		16.52
30 Lake Center Drive			Marlton		NJ		1986		40,287		100.0	%		802		20.73
20 East Clementon Road			Gibbsboro		NJ		1986		38,260		84.4	%		661		18.99
Two Eves Drive			Marlton		NJ		1987		37,532		100.0	%		661		18.42
304 Harper Drive			Moorestown		NJ		1975		32,978		100.0	%		621		21.15
Main Street - Promenade			Voorhees		NJ		1988		31,445		86.0	%		420		17.03
Four B Eves Drive			Marlton		NJ		1987		27,011		82.8	%		315		19.13
815 East Gate Drive			Mt. Laurel		NJ		1986		25,500		33.3	%		166		18.91
817 East Gate Drive			Mt. Laurel		NJ		1986		25,351		38.5	%		190		14.24
Four A Eves Drive			Marlton		NJ		1987		24,687		100.0	%		349		16.10
1 Foster Avenue	(i)		Gibbsboro		NJ		1972		24,255		100.0	%		31		2.65
4 Foster Avenue	(i)		Gibbsboro		NJ		1974		23,372		100.0	%		139		6.06
7 Foster Avenue			Gibbsboro		NJ		1983		22,158		94.1	%		348		18.88
10 Foster Avenue			Gibbsboro		NJ		1983		18,651		97.1	%		218		14.70
305 Harper Drive			Moorestown		NJ		1979		14,980		100.0	%		124		8.98
5 U.S. Avenue	(i)		Gibbsboro		NJ		1987		5,000		100.0	%		22		4.40
50 East Clementon Road			Gibbsboro		NJ		1986		3,080		100.0	%		145		47.01
5 Foster Avenue			Gibbsboro		NJ		1968		2,000		100.0	%		7		—
URBAN SEGMENT
100 North 18th Street	(g)		Philadelphia		PA		1988		696,477		92.3	%		5,163		29.77
130 North 18th Street			Philadelphia		PA		1998		594,095		99.6	%		3,335		25.75
Philadelphia Marine Center	(d)		Philadelphia		PA		Various		181,900		100.0	%		1,390		5.79
300 Delaware Avenue			Wilmington		DE		1989		310,652		80.9	%		911		14.62
920 North King Street			Wilmington		DE		1989		203,088		99.1	%		1,223		24.76
400 Commerce Drive			Newark		DE		1997		154,086		100.0	%		2,268		15.32
One Righter Parkway	(d)		Wilmington		DE		1989		104,828		100.0	%		2,293		24.82
Two Righter Parkway	(d)		Wilmington		DE		1987		95,514		100.0	%		1,919		22.15
200 Commerce Drive			Newark		DE		1998		68,034		100.0	%		988		4.52
100 Commerce Drive			Newark		DE		1989		62,787		96.6	%		875		14.43
111/113 Pencader Drive			Newark		DE		1990		52,665		86.9	%		386		11.62
VIRGINIA SEGMENT
600 East Main Street			Richmond		VA		1986		424,618		85.4	%		5,775		18.92
300 Arboretum Place			Richmond		VA		1988		212,647		100.0	%		3,646		10.63
6802 Paragon Place			Richmond		VA		1989		143,450		78.6	%		1,749		15.31
2511 Brittons Hill Road	(i)		Richmond		VA		1987		132,103		85.6	%		396		4.98
2100-2116 West Laburnam Avenue			Richmond		VA		1976		126,809		100.0	%		1,741		15.30
1957 Westmoreland Street	(i)		Richmond		VA		1975		121,815		100.0	%		533		5.18
2201-2245 Tomlynn Street	(i)		Richmond		VA		1989		85,860		98.0	%		579		7.21
100 Gateway Centre Parkway			Richmond		VA		2001		74,585		100.0	%		1,470		20.62
9011 Arboretum Parkway			Richmond		VA		1991		72,932		100.0	%		1,245		17.18
4805 Lake Brooke Drive			Glen Allen		VA		1996		61,836		94.0	%		953		15.07
9100 Arboretum Parkway			Richmond		VA		1988		57,611		87.7	%		1,046		18.42
2812 Emerywood Parkway			Henrico		VA		1980		57,147		100.0	%		574		14.66
2277 Dabney Road	(i)		Richmond		VA		1986		50,400		100.0	%		259		6.71
9200 Arboretum Parkway			Richmond		VA		1988		49,542		90.3	%		540		11.72
9210 Arboretum Parkway			Richmond		VA		1988		48,012		89.5	%		544		12.26

Back to Contents

Property Name		Location		State		Year Built		Net Rentable Square Feet		Percentage Leased as of December 31, 2004 (a)			Total Base Rent for the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2004 (b) (000’s)		Average Annualized Rental Rate as of December 31, 2004 (c)

2212-2224 Tomlynn Street	(i)		Richmond		VA		1985		45,353		100.0	%		220		6.88
2221-2245 Dabney Road	(i)		Richmond		VA		1994		45,250		100.0	%		273		7.74
2251 Dabney Road	(i)		Richmond		VA		1983		42,000		100.0	%		216		6.55
2161-2179 Tomlynn Street	(i)		Richmond		VA		1985		41,550		100.0	%		187		7.10
2256 Dabney Road	(i)		Richmond		VA		1982		33,600		100.0	%		182		6.87
2246 Dabney Road	(i)		Richmond		VA		1987		33,271		100.0	%		284		9.75
2244 Dabney Road	(i)		Richmond		VA		1993		33,050		100.0	%		298		10.00
9211 Arboretum Parkway			Richmond		VA		1991		30,791		100.0	%		385		12.38
2248 Dabney Road	(i)		Richmond		VA		1989		30,184		100.0	%		199		8.74
2130-2146 Tomlynn Street	(i)		Richmond		VA		1988		29,700		100.0	%		261		10.16
2120 Tomlyn Street	(i)		Richmond		VA		1986		23,850		100.0	%		141		7.72
2240 Dabney Road	(i)		Richmond		VA		1984		15,389		100.0	%		139		10.32
4364 South Alston Avenue			Durham		NC		1985		56,601		100.0	%		1,132		19.36

TOTAL ALL PROPERTIES / WEIGHTED AVG.									19,344,537		92.7	%

Back to Contents

(a)	Calculated by dividing net rentable square feet included in leases signed on or before December 31, 2004 at the property by the aggregate net rentable square feet of the Property.

(b)	“Total Base Rent” for the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 represents base rents received during such period, excluding tenant reimbursements, calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) determined on a straight-line basis. Tenant reimbursements generally include payment of real estate taxes, operating expenses and common area maintenance and utility charges.

(c)	“Average Annualized Rental Rate” is calculated as follows: (i) for office leases written on a triple net basis, the sum of the annualized contracted base rental rates payable for all space leased as of December 31, 2004 (without giving effect to free rent or scheduled rent increases that would be taken into account under GAAP) plus the 2004 budgeted operating expenses excluding tenant electricity; and (ii) for office leases written on a full service basis, the annualized contracted base rent payable for all space leased as of December 31, 2004. In both cases, the annualized rental rate is divided by the total square footage leased as of December 31, 2004 without giving effect to free rent or scheduled rent increases that would be taken into account under GAAP.

(d)	This Property is subject to a ground lease with a third party.

(e)	These properties are under redevelopment and are excluded from the percentages for Weighted Average Percentage Leased and Average Annualized Rental Rate information.

(f)	These Properties represent “lease-up” assets that were acquired in September 2004 as part of the TRC acquisition. The assets have an expected stabilization date of September 2007. These properties are excluded from the percentages for Weighted Average Percentage Leased and Average Annualized Rental Rate information.

(g)	We hold our interest in Two Logan Square (100 North 18^th Street) primarily through our ownership of second and third mortgages that are secured by this property and that are junior to a first mortgage. Our ownership of these two mortgages currently provides us with all of the cash flows from Two Logan Square after the payment of operating expenses and debt service on the first mortgage.

(h)	Effective March 31, 2004, we consolidated these properties under the provisions of Financial Interpretation No. 46R. See “Real Estate Ventures” below. These properties are excluded from the percentage for Weighted Average Percentage Leased.

(i)	These properties are industrial facilities.

The following table shows certain information regarding rental rates and lease expirations for the Properties at December 31, 2004, assuming none of the tenants exercises renewal options or termination rights, if any, at or prior to scheduled expirations:

Year of Lease Expiration December 31,	Number of Leases Expiring Within the Year		Rentable Square Footage Subject to Expiring Leases		Final Annualized Base Rent Under Expiring Leases (a)		Final Annualized Base Rent Per Square Foot Under Expiring Leases		Percentage of Total Final Annualized Base Rent Under Expiring Leases			Cumulative Total

2005		366		2,671,416		51,979,927	$	19.46		15.5	%		15.5	%
2006		249		1,969,249		36,252,324		18.41		10.8	%		26.3	%
2007		214		2,055,113		39,889,883		19.41		11.9	%		38.2	%
2008		196		2,056,274		44,104,922		21.45		13.2	%		51.4	%
2009		186		2,214,250		45,809,034		20.69		13.6	%		65.0	%
2010		81		1,588,802		37,917,785		23.87		11.3	%		76.3	%
2011		35		825,332		14,132,910		17.12		4.2	%		80.5	%
2012		21		780,586		16,568,805		21.23		4.9	%		85.4	%
2013		14		305,945		7,742,204		25.31		2.3	%		87.7	%
2014		30		779,856		12,793,333		16.40		3.8	%		91.5	%
2015 and thereafter		25		1,297,030		28,438,401		21.93		8.5	%		100.0	%

		1,417		16,543,853	$	335,629,528	$	20.29		100.0	%

(a)

“Final Annualized Base Rent” for each lease scheduled to expire represents the cash rental rate of base rents, excluding tenant reimbursements, in the final month prior to expiration multiplied by 12. Tenant reimbursements generally include payment of real estate taxes, operating expenses and common area maintenance and utility charges.

-30-

Back to Contents

At December 31, 2004, the Properties were leased to 1,179 tenants that are engaged in a variety of businesses. The following table sets forth information regarding leases at the Properties with the 20 tenants with the largest amounts leased based upon Annualized Escalated Rent from the Properties as of December 31, 2004:

Tenant Name (a)	Number of Leases		Weighted Average Remaining Lease Term in Months		Aggregate Square Feet Leased		Percentage of Aggregate Leased Square Feet			Annualized Escalated Rent (in 000) (b)		Percentage of Aggregate Annualized Escalated Rent

State of New Jersey		7		56		454,347		2.7	%	$	13,610		3.7	%
Pepper Hamilton LLP		5		112		291,431		1.7	%		9,889		2.7	%
Penske Truck Leasing		1		192		337,925		2.0	%		5,971		1.6	%
Computer Sciences		5		27		277,250		1.7	%		5,868		1.6	%
Drinker Biddle & Reath		3		109		200,437		1.2	%		5,346		1.5	%
Blank Rome LLP		2		40		220,941		1.3	%		5,291		1.4	%
Verizon		5		32		237,126		1.4	%		5,269		1.4	%
Marsh USA, Inc.		2		55		145,566		0.9	%		4,705		1.3	%
Lockheed Martin		7		11		332,950		2.0	%		4,282		1.2	%
Omnicare Clinical Research		1		67		150,000		0.9	%		4,047		1.1	%
KPMG LLP		4		63		108,475		0.6	%		4,023		1.1	%
First Consulting Group		1		40		118,138		0.7	%		3,843		1.0	%
Hartford Life		4		32		169,170		1.0	%		3,755		1.0	%
Parsons		1		63		172,939		1.0	%		3,575		1.0	%
Aventis Behring		1		34		143,025		0.9	%		3,453		0.9	%
Gemstar - T.V. Guide		1		91		163,517		1.0	%		3,076		0.8	%
ICT Group		2		122		121,651		0.7	%		3,042		0.8	%
General Electric		4		10		120,758		0.7	%		2,998		0.8	%
Automotive Rentals		5		68		131,554		0.8	%		2,956		0.8	%
Covance Periapproval Services		2		7		87,224		0.5	%		2,829		0.8	%

Consolidated Total/Weighted Average		63		66		3,984,424		23.7	%	$	97,828		26.5	%

(a)	The identified tenant includes affiliates in certain circumstances.

(b)	Annualized Escalated Rent represents the monthly Escalated Rent for each lease in effect at December 31, 2004 multiplied by 12. Escalated Rent represents fixed base rental amounts plus tenant reimbursements which include payment of real estate taxes, operating expenses and common area maintenance and utility charges. The Company estimates operating expense reimbursements based on historical amounts and comparable market data.

The following table sets forth the year-end occupancy percentages of the Company’s Properties for the last five years (based on Properties owned by us as of such year end dates and excluding five “lease-up” assets acquired as part of the TRC acquisition):

Year ended December 31,	Occupancy %

2004		91.8	%
2003		90.7	%
2002		91.0	%
2001		92.2	%
2000		95.6	%

Our occupancy percentage at December 31, 2004, including the five “lease-up” assets, was 87.7%.

Real Estate Ventures

As of December 31, 2004, we had an aggregate investment of approximately $12.8 million in nine Real Estate Ventures (net of returns of investment). We formed these ventures with unaffiliated third parties to develop office properties or to acquire land in anticipation of possible development of office properties. Seven of the Real Estate Ventures own eight office buildings that contain an aggregate of approximately 1.6 million net rentable square feet, one Real Estate Venture developed a hotel property that contains 137 rooms and one Real Estate Venture is developing an office property located in Charlottesville,Virginia.

We also have investments in two real estate ventures that are considered to be variable interest entities under FIN No. 46 and of which we are the primary beneficiary. The financial information for these two real

-31-

Back to Contents

estate ventures (Four and Six Tower Bridge) were consolidated into our consolidated financial statements effective March 31, 2004. Prior to March 31, 2004, we accounted for our investment in these two ventures under the equity method.

We account for our non-controlling interests in the Real Estate Ventures using the equity method. Non-controlling ownership interests range from 6% to 50%, subject to specified priority allocations in certain of the Real Estate Ventures. Our investments, initially recorded at cost, are subsequently adjusted for our share of the Real Estate Ventures’ income or loss and cash contributions and distributions.

As of December 31, 2004, we had guaranteed repayment of approximately $0.6 million of loans for the Real Estate Ventures. We also provide customary environmental indemnities in connection with construction and permanent financing both for its own account and on behalf of the Real Estate Ventures.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We are involved from time to time in litigation on various matters, which include disputes with tenants and disputes arising out of agreements to purchase or sell properties. Given the nature of our business activities, these lawsuits are considered routine to the conduct of its business. The result of any particular lawsuit cannot be predicted, because of the very nature of litigation, the litigation process and its adversarial nature, and the jury system.

There have been recent reports of lawsuits against owners and managers of multifamily and office properties asserting claims of personal injury and property damage caused by the presence of mold in residential units or office space. We have been named as a defendant in two lawsuits in the State of New Jersey that allege personal injury as a result of the presence of mold. In 2005, one lawsuit was dismissed by way of summary judgment with predjudice. Unspecified damages are sought in the remaining lawsuit. We have referred this lawsuit to our environmental insurance carrier and, as of the date of this Form 10-K, the insurance carrier is tendering a defense to this claim.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

We did not submit any matters to a vote of security holders in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Shareholder Matters

Our Common Shares are traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “BDN.” On March 9, 2005, there were 447 holders of record of our Common Shares. On March 9, 2005, the last reported sales price of the Common Shares on the NYSE was $29.22. The following table sets forth the quarterly high and low closing sales price per share reported on the NYSE for the indicated periods and the distributions paid by us with respect to each such period.

	Share Price High		Share Price Low		Distributions Declared For Quarter

First Quarter 2003	$	22.00	$	19.32	$	0.44
Second Quarter 2003	$	24.84	$	21.00	$	0.44
Third Quarter 2003	$	25.72	$	23.87	$	0.44
Fourth Quarter 2003	$	27.74	$	24.63	$	0.44
First Quarter 2004	$	30.55	$	26.50	$	0.44
Second Quarter 2004	$	30.81	$	24.30	$	0.44
Third Quarter 2004	$	29.81	$	26.08	$	0.44
Fourth Quarter 2004	$	30.31	$	28.15	$	0.44

-32-

Back to Contents

In order to maintain our status as a REIT, we must make annual distributions to shareholders of at least 90% of our taxable income (not including net capital gains). Future distributions by us will be declared at the discretion of the Board of Trustees and will depend on our actual cash flow, our financial condition, capital requirements, the annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and such other factors as our Board of Trustees deems relevant.

On November 10, 2004, we issued 50,000 Common Shares (at a price per share of $24.00) upon exercise of warrants that we issued in April 1999 to Five Arrows Realty Securities III L.L.C. (“Five Arrows”). On each of November 12, 2004 and December 1, 2004, we issued to Five Arrows 100,000 Common Shares (at a price of $24.00 per share) upon exercise of the remaining balance of these warrants. We issued these shares in reliance on an exemption from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

The following table provides information as of December 31, 2004 with respect to compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance:

		(a)		(b)			(c)
Plan category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights			Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1)		2,278,060	$	26.70 (2	)		1,228,681
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		—		—			—

Total		2,278,060	$	26.70 (2	)		1,228,681

(1)	Relates to our 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan. Under our 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan, our Compensation Committee may make awards of restricted Common Shares, options to acquire Common Shares and performance units or other instruments that have a value tied to our Common Shares. Subject to the maximum number of shares that may be issued or made the subject of awards under the Plan, the Plan does not limit the number of any specific type of award that may be made under the Plan.

(2)	Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options; excludes restricted Common Shares.

During the year ended December 31, 2004, we did not purchase any of our outstanding Common Shares.

-33-

Back to Contents

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The following table sets forth our selected financial and operating data, on a historical consolidated basis, which has been revised for the reclassification of losses from early extinguishments of debt, in accordance with SFAS No. 145 and the disposition of all properties since January 1, 2002 which have been reclassified as discontinued operations for all periods presented in accordance with SFAS No. 144. The following information should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(in thousands, except per Common Share data and number of properties)

Year Ended December 31,	2004			2003			2002			2001			2000

Operating Results
Total revenue	$	323,592		$	301,464		$	286,712		$	265,838		$	249,141
Net income		60,303			86,678			62,984			33,722			52,158
Income allocated to Common Shares		55,083			54,174			51,078			21,816			40,252
Earnings per Common Share
Basic	$	1.15		$	1.43		$	1.40		$	0.57		$	1.12
Diluted	$	1.15		$	1.43		$	1.39		$	0.57		$	1.12
Cash distributions declared per Common Share	$	1.76		$	1.76		$	1.76		$	1.70		$	1.62
Balance Sheet Data
Real estate investments, net of accumulated depreciation	$	2,363,865		$	1,695,355		$	1,745,981		$	1,812,909		$	1,674,341
Total assets		2,633,984			1,855,776			1,919,288			1,960,203			1,821,103
Total indebtedness		1,306,669			867,659			1,004,729			1,009,165			866,202
Total liabilities		1,444,116			950,431			1,097,793			1,108,213			923,961
Minority interest		42,866			133,488			135,052			143,834			144,974
Beneficiaries' equity		1,147,002			771,857			686,443			708,156			752,168
Other Data
Cash flows from:
Operating activities		153,183			118,793			128,836			152,040			103,123
Investing activities		(682,945	)		(34,068	)		5,038			(123,682	)		(32,372	)
Financing activities		536,556			(102,974	)		(120,532	)		(30,939	)		(60,403	)
Property Data
Number of properties owned at year end		246			234			238			270			250
Net rentable square feet owned at year end		19,150			15,733			16,052			17,312			16,471

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements appearing elsewhere herein. The results of operations and cash flows of the Company include the historical results of operations of the Properties held by the Company during the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002. This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements for purposes of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and as such may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, there can be no assurance that these expectations will be realized. See Item 1. Business – Risk Factors.

-34-

Back to Contents

OVERVIEW

The Company currently manages its portfolio within five geographic segments: (1) Pennsylvania—West, (2) Pennsylvania—North, (3) New Jersey, (4) Urban and (5) Virginia. The Company believes it has established an effective platform in these office and industrial markets that provides a foundation for achieving its goals of maximizing market penetration, optimizing operating economies of scale and creating long-term investment value.

The Company receives income primarily from rental revenue (including tenant reimbursements) from the Properties and, to a lesser extent, from the management of properties owned by third parties and from investments in the Real Estate Ventures.

The Company’s financial performance is dependent upon the demand for office and other commercial space in its markets. Current economic conditions, including recessionary pressures and capital market volatility, have enhanced the challenges facing the Company.

In the current economic climate, the Company continues to seek revenue growth through an increase in occupancy of its portfolio (91.8% at December 31, 2004, or 87.7% including five lease-up assets acquired as part of the TRC acquisition) and the development of new properties.

As the Company seeks to increase revenue, management also focuses on strategies to minimize operating risks, including (i) tenant rollover risk, (ii) tenant credit risk and (iii) development risk.

Tenant Rollover Risk:

The Company is subject to the risk that, upon expiration, leases may not be renewed, the space may not be relet, or the terms of renewal or reletting (including the cost of renovations) may be less favorable than the current lease terms. Leases accounting for approximately 15.4% of the aggregate annualized base rents from the Properties as of December 31, 2004 (representing approximately 14.8% of the net rentable square feet of the Properties) expire without penalty in 2005. The Company maintains an active dialogue with its tenants in an effort to achieve a high level of lease renewals. The Company’s retention rate for leases that were scheduled to expire in the year ended December 31, 2004 was 79.2%. If the Company is unable to renew leases for a substantial portion of the space under expiring leases, or to promptly relet this space, at anticipated rental rates, the Company’s cash flow could be adversely impacted.

Tenant Credit Risk:

In the event of a tenant default, the Company may experience delays in enforcing its rights as a landlord and may incur substantial costs in protecting its investment. Management regularly evaluates its accounts receivable reserve policy in light of its tenant base and general and local economic conditions. The accounts receivable allowance was $4.1 million or 8.4% of total receivables (including accrued rent receivable) as of December 31, 2004 compared to $4.0 million or 11.2% of total receivables (including accrued rent receivable) as of December 31, 2003.

Development Risk:

The Company currently has in development or redevelopment six sites aggregating approximately 1.0 million square feet. The total cost of these projects is estimated to be $221.3 million, of which $112.3 million was incurred as of December 31, 2004. While the Company is actively marketing space at these projects to prospective tenants, management cannot provide assurance as to the timing or terms of any leases of such space. As of December 31, 2004, the Company owned approximately 445 acres of undeveloped land. Risks associated with development of this land include construction cost increases or overruns and construction delays, insufficient occupancy rates, building moratoriums and inability to obtain necessary zoning, land-use, building, occupancy and other required governmental approvals.

-35-

Back to Contents

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations discusses the Company’s consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.

The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included this Annual Report on Form 10-K. While the estimates and judgments associated with the application of these accounting policies may be affected by different assumptions or conditions, the Company believes the estimates and judgments associated with the reported amounts are appropriate in the circumstances. The following identifies critical accounting policies that are used in preparing the Company’s consolidated financial statements, including those policies which require significant judgment and estimates:

Revenue Recognition

Rental revenue is recognized on the straight-line basis from the later of the date of the commencement of the lease or the date of acquisition of the property subject to existing leases, which averages minimum rents over the terms of the leases. Certain lease agreements contain provisions that require tenants to reimburse a pro rata share of real estate taxes and common area maintenance costs.

Real Estate Investments

Real estate investments are carried at cost. The Company records acquisition of real estate investments under the purchase method of accounting and allocates the purchase price to land, buildings and intangible assets on a relative fair value basis. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the useful lives of buildings and capital improvements (5 to 40 years) and over the shorter of the lease term or the life of the asset for tenant improvements. Direct construction costs related to the development of Properties and land holdings are capitalized as incurred. The Company expenses routine repair and maintenance expenditures.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Management reviews investments in real estate and real estate ventures for impairment if facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. Measurement of any impairment loss will be based on the fair value of the asset, determined using customary valuation techniques, such as the present value of expected future cash flows.

In accordance with SFAS No. 144 (“SFAS 144”), Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, long-lived assets, such as real estate investments and purchased intangibles subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of would be separately presented in the balance sheet and reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell, and are no longer depreciated. The assets and liabilities relating to assets classified as held-for-sale would be presented separately in the appropriate asset and liability sections of the balance sheet.

Income Taxes

The Company may elect to treat one or more of its corporate subsidiaries as a taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”). In general, a TRS of the Company may perform additional services for tenants of the Company and generally may engage in any real estate or non-real estate related business (except for the operation or management of health care facilities or lodging facilities or providing to any person, under a franchise, license or otherwise, rights to any brand name under which any lodging facility or health care facility is operated). A TRS is subject to corporate federal income tax. The Company has elected to treat certain of

-36-

Back to Contents

its corporate subsidiaries as TRS’s. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, the Company will be subject to federal income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on its taxable income at regular corporate tax rates.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts that represents an estimate of losses that may be incurred from the inability of tenants to make required payments. The allowance is an estimate based on two calculations that are combined to determine the total amount reserved. First, the Company evaluates specific accounts where it has determined that a tenant may have an inability to meet its financial obligations. In these situations, the Company uses its judgment, based on the facts and circumstances, and records a specific reserve for that tenant against amounts due to reduce the receivable to the amount that the Company expects to collect. These reserves are reevaluated and adjusted as additional information becomes available. Second, a reserve is established for all tenants based on a range of percentages applied to receivable aging categories. These percentages are based on historical collection and write-off experience. If the financial condition of the Company’s tenants were to deteriorate, additional allowances may be required.

Deferred Costs

The Company incurs direct costs related to the financing, development and leasing of the Properties. Management exercises judgment in determining whether such costs meet the criteria for capitalization or must be expensed. Capitalized financing fees are amortized over the related loan term and capitalized leasing costs are amortized over the related lease term. Management re-evaluates the remaining useful lives of leasing costs as the creditworthiness of the Company’s tenants and economic and market conditions change.

Purchase Price Allocation

The Company allocates the purchase price of properties to net tangible and identified intangible assets acquired based on fair values. Above-market and below-market in-place lease values for acquired properties are recorded based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (ii) the Company’s estimate of the fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancellable term of the lease. Capitalized above-market lease values are amortized as a reduction of rental income over the remaining non-cancellable terms of the respective leases. Capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an increase of rental income over the remaining non-cancellable terms of the respective leases, including any fixed-rate renewal periods.

Other intangible assets also include amounts representing the value of tenant relationships and in-place leases based on the Company’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and the Company’s overall relationship with the respective tenant. The Company estimates the cost to execute leases with terms similar to the remaining lease terms of the in-place leases, include leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses. This intangible asset is amortized to expense over the remaining term of the respective leases. Company estimates of fair value are made using methods similar to those used by independent appraisers or by using independent appraisals. Factors considered by the Company in their analysis include an estimate of the carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. The Company also considers information obtained about each property as a result of its pre-acquisition due diligence, marketing and leasing activities in estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired. In estimating carrying costs, the Company includes real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the expected lease-up periods, which primarily range from three to twelve months.

-37-

Back to Contents

renewals, but in no event longer than the remaining depreciable life of the building. The value of in-place leases is amortized over the remaining non-cancellable term of the respective leases and any fixed-rate renewal periods.

In the event that a tenant terminates its lease, the unamortized portion of each intangible, including market rate adjustments, in-place lease values and tenant relationship values, would be charged to expense.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2004 to the Year Ended December 31, 2003

The table below shows selected operating information for the Same Store Property Portfolio and the Total Portfolio. The Same Store Property Portfolio consists of 221 Properties containing an aggregate of approximately 14.7 million net rentable square feet that were owned for the entire twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2004 and 2003. This table also includes a reconciliation from the Same Store Property Portfolio to the Total Portfolio (i.e. all properties owned by us as of December 31, 2004 and 2003) by providing information for the properties which were acquired, sold, or placed into service and administrative/elimination information for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003.

	Same Store Property Portfolio										Properties Acquired				Properties Sold (a)

*(dollars in thousands)*	2004		2003		Increase/ (Decrease)			% Change			2004		2003		2004		2003

Revenue:
Rents	$	240,248	$	240,165	$	83			0	%	$	32,615	$	1,308		—	$	12,286
Tenant reimbursements		32,803		31,021		1,782			6	%		4,511		174		—		6,086
Other		2,337		2,900		(563	)		-19	%		332		4		—		—

Total revenue		275,388		274,086		1,302			0	%		37,458		1,486		—		18,372
Operating Expenses:
Property operating expenses		85,302		83,506		1,796			2	%		11,542		590		—		6,705
Real estate taxes		26,493		24,975		1,518			6	%		3,699		363		—		1,655
Depreciation and amortization		61,166		55,854		5,312			10	%		16,157		449		—		1,808
Administrative expenses

Total property operating expenses		172,961		164,335		8,626			5	%		31,398		1,402		—		10,168

Operating Income		102,427		109,751		(7,324	)		-7	%		6,060		84		—		8,204
Other Income (Expense):
Interest income
Interest expense
Equity in income of real estate ventures
Net gain on sales of interest in real estate
Income before minority interest
Minority interest attributable to continuing operations
Income from continuing operations
Income from discontinued operations
Net Income

	Development Properties					Administrative/ Eliminations (b)						Total Portfolio

*(dollars in thousands)*	2004			2003		2004			2003			2004			2003			Increase/ (Decrease)			% Change

Revenue:
Rents	$	2,768		$	2,857		—			—		$	275,631		$	256,616		$	19,015			7	%
Tenant reimbursements		258			237		—			—			37,572			37,518			54			0	%
Other		54			5		7,666			4,421			10,389			7,330			3,059			42	%

Total revenue		3,080			3,099		7,666			4,421			323,592			301,464			22,128			7	%
Operating Expenses:
Property operating expenses		1,504			1,398		(8,491	)		(11,955	)		89,857			80,244			9,613			12	%
Real estate taxes		870			688		—			—			31,062			27,681			3,381			12	%
Depreciation and amortization		1,312			912		1,269			1,309			79,904			60,332			19,572			32	%
Administrative expenses							15,100			14,464			15,100			14,464			636			4	%

Total property operating expenses		3,686			2,998		7,878			3,818			215,923			182,721			33,202			18	%

Operating Income		(606	)		101		(212	)		603			107,669			118,743			(11,074	)		-9	%
Other Income (Expense):
Interest income													2,469			3,629			(1,160	)		-32	%
Interest expense													(55,061	)		(57,835	)		2,774			5	%
Equity in income of real estate ventures													2,024			52			1,972			100	%
Net gain on sales of interest in real estate													2,975			20,537			(17,562	)		86	%

Income before minority interest													60,076			85,126			(25,050	)		-29	%
Minority interest attributable to continuing operations													(2,472	)		(9,294	)		6,822			73	%

Income from continuing operations													57,604			75,832			(18,228	)		-24	%
Income from discontinued operations													2,699			10,846			(8,147	)		-75	%

Net Income													60,303			86,678			(26,375	)		-30	%


(a) -	Includes properties sold during the period that are not included in discontinued operations as they did not meet the critieria under SFAS No. 144 (“SFAS 144”), Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.
(b) -	Represents certain revenue and expenses at the corporate level as well as various intercompany costs that are eliminated in consolidation.

Revenue

Revenue increased by $22.1 million primarily due to properties that were acquired in 2004, offset by decreased occupancy and revenue from properties sold during 2003. Revenue for Same Store Properties increased by $1.3 million due to increased tenant reimbursement revenue resulting from increased property operating expenses in 2004 as compared to 2003. Average occupancy for the Same Store Properties decreased to 91.0% in 2004 from 91.1% in 2003. Other revenue represents lease termination fees, bankruptcy settlement proceeds, leasing commissions and third-party management fees. Total Portfolio other revenue increased by $3.1 million in 2004 primarily due to the settlement of a previously disclosed

-38-

Back to Contents

litigation in 2004 ($1.0 million plus accrued interest on the Company’s security deposit that was released ) and $0.9 million from the settlement of an accrued liability associated with a 1998 acquisition.

Operating Expenses and Real Estate Taxes

Property operating expenses increased by $9.6 million in 2004 primarily due to increased repairs and maintenance costs and additional properties in 2004. Property operating expenses for the Same Store Properties increased by $1.8 million in 2004 due to increased repairs and maintenance costs at various Same Store Properties.

Real estate taxes increased by $3.4 million primarily due to increased real estate tax assessments in 2004 and additional properties in 2004. Real estate taxes for the Same Store Properties increased by $1.5 million in 2004 as a result of higher tax rates and property assessments.

Interest Expense

Interest expense decreased by $2.8 million in 2004 primarily due to decreased interest rates on the Company’s unsecured line of credit borrowings and term loans, expiration of the Company’s interest rate swap agreements in June 2004, offset by interest expense associated with the increased debt from the Company’s fixed rate unsecured notes issued in the fourth quarter of 2004.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense

Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $19.6 million in 2004 primarily due to properties acquired in 2004, a full year of depreciation and amortization of properties acquired during 2003 and additional amortization from tenant improvements and leasing commissions paid during 2004.

Administrative Expenses

Administrative expenses increased by $0.6 million in 2004 primarily due to increased payroll and related costs associated with employees hired as part of the TRC acquisition in September 2004 and increased professional fees associated with the audit of the Operating Partnership for the 2003, 2002, and 2001 fiscal years. The audit was completed in connection with the Operating Partnership’s registration statement on Form 10 with the SEC in June 2004.

Equity in Income of Real Estate Ventures

Equity in income of Real Estate Ventures increased by $2.0 million in 2004 as a result of increased net income from the Real Estate Ventures and an impairment charge recorded during 2003 associated with the write-down by the Company of its investment in a non-operating joint venture of $0.9 million.

Gains on Sales of Real Estate

Gains on sales of real estate decreased by $17.6 million during 2004 from gains on sales recorded in 2003 of $20.5 million. This decrease was partially offset by a gain on the purchase and sale of a land parcel to two separate third parties during 2004 in which the Company recorded a gain of approximately $1.5 million.

Minority Interest

Minority interest from continuing operations represents the equity in income attributable to the portion of the Operating Partnership not owned by the Company. Minority interest from continuing operations decreased by $6.8 million in 2004 primarily due to decreased net income (as a result of decreased gains on sales) and the redemption of the Series B Preferred Units in February 2004.

-39-

Back to Contents

Discontinued Operations

Discontinued operations decreased by $8.1 million in 2004 primarily due to the timing of property sales for assets included in discontinued operations in 2004 as compared to 2003. Additionally, the Company sold four properties and three land parcels in 2004 realizing net gains of $3.1 million and sold nine properties in 2003 realizing a net gain of $9.6 million.

Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2003 to the Year Ended December 31, 2002

The table below shows selected operating information for the Same Store Property Portfolio and the Total Portfolio. The Same Store Property Portfolio consists of 211 Properties containing an aggregate of approximately 13.6 million net rentable square feet that were owned for the entire twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2003 and 2002. This table also includes a reconciliation from the Same Store Property Portfolio to the Total Portfolio (i.e. all properties owned by us as of December 31, 2004 and 2003) by providing information for the properties which were acquired, sold, or placed into service and administrative/elimination information for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002.


	Same Store Property Portfolio										Properties Acquired				Properties Sold (a)

*(dollars in thousands)*	2003		2002		Increase/ (Decrease)			% Change			2003		2002		2003		2002

Revenue:
Rents	$	213,143	$	211,079	$	2,064			1	%	$	28,195	$	19,408		12,286	$	13,127
Tenant reimbursements		28,945		25,304		3,641			14	%		2,224		1,212		6,086		6,235
Other		2,743		2,896		(153	)		-5	%		159		73		—		3

Total revenue		244,831		239,279		5,552			2	%		30,578		20,693		18,372		19,365
Operating Expenses:
Property operating expenses		76,047		70,470		5,577			8	%		7,929		5,370		6,705		7,485
Real estate taxes		22,638		21,611		1,027			5	%		2,674		1,279		1,655		1,627
Depreciation and amortization		48,090		47,038		1,052			2	%		8,092		4,707		1,808		1,949
Administrative expenses

Total property operating expenses		146,775		139,119		7,656			6	%		18,695		11,356		10,168		11,061

Operating Income		98,056		100,160		(2,104	)		-2	%		11,883		9,337		8,204		8,304
Other Income (Expense):
Interest income
Interest expense
Equity in income of real estate ventures
Net gain on sales of interest in real estate
Income before minority interest
Minority interest attributable to continuing operations
Income from continuing operations
Income from discontinued operations
Net Income

	Development Properties				Administrative/ Eliminations (b)						Total Portfolio

*(dollars in thousands)*	2003		2002		2003			2002			2003			2002			Increase/ (Decrease)			% Change

Revenue:
Rents	$	2,992	$	3,736		—			—		$	256,616		$	247,350		$	9,266			4	%
Tenant reimbursements		2/63		310		—			—			37,518			33,061			4,457			13	%
Other		6		131		4,422			3,198			7,330			6,301			1,029			16	%

Total revenue		3,261		4,177		4,422			3,198			301,464			286,712			14,752			5	%
Operating Expenses:
Property operating expenses		1,519		1,558		(11,956	)		(10,068	)		80,244			74,815			5,429			7	%
Real estate taxes		714		502		—			—			27,681			25,019			2,662			11	%
Depreciation and amortization		1,006		1,200		1,336			1,031			60,332			55,925			4,407			8	%
Administrative expenses						14,464			14,804			14,464			14,804			(340	)		-2	%

Total property operating expenses		3,239		3,260		3,844			5,767			182,721			170,563			12,158			7	%

Operating Income		22		917		578			(2,569	)		118,743			116,149			2,594			2	%
Other Income (Expense):
Interest income												3,629			3,399			230			7	%
Interest expense												(57,835	)		(63,522	)		5,687			9	%
Equity in income of real estate ventures												52			987			(935	)		-95	%
Net gain on sales of interest in real estate												20,537			5			20,532			100	%

Income before minority interest												85,126			57,018			28,108			49	%
Minority interest attributable to continuing operations												(9,294	)		(9,375	)		81			1	%

Income from continuing operations												75,832			47,643			28,189			59	%
Income from discontinued operations												10,846			15,341			(4,495	)		-29	%

Net Income												86,678			62,984			23,694			38	%


(a) -	Includes properties sold during the period that are not included in discontinued operations as they did not meet the critieria under SFAS No. 144 (“SFAS 144”), Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.

(b) -	Represents certain revenue and expenses at the corporate level as well as various intercompany costs that are eliminated in consolidation.

Revenue

Revenue increased by $14.8 million primarily due to increased rental rates and properties acquired in 2003 and 2002, offset by decreased occupancy and revenue from properties sold during 2003 and 2002. Revenue for Same Store Properties increased by $5.6 million due to increased rental rates and occupancy as well as increased tenant reimbursements from higher operating expenses in 2003 as compared to 2002. Average occupancy for the Same Store Properties increased to 91.0% in 2003 from 90.9% in 2002. Other revenue represents lease termination fees, bankruptcy settlement proceeds, leasing commissions and third-party management fees. Total Portfolio other revenue increased by $1.0 million in 2003 primarily due to income from various termination agreements.

-40-

Back to Contents

Operating Expenses and Real Estate Taxes

Property operating expenses increased by $5.4 million in 2003 primarily due to increased snow removal costs and additional properties in 2003. Property operating expenses for the Same Store Properties increased by $5.6 million in 2003 primarily due to increased snow removal in 2003 as compared to 2002.

Real estate taxes increased by $2.7 million primarily due to increased real estate tax assessments in 2003 over 2002 and additional properties in 2003. Real estate taxes for the Same Store Properties increased by $1.0 million in 2003 as a result of higher tax rates and property assessments.

Interest Expense

Interest expense decreased by $5.7 million in 2003 primarily due to decreased interest rates on the Company’s unsecured line of credit borrowings and term loan and decreased average borrowings during 2003.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense

Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $4.4 million in 2003 primarily due to properties acquired in 2003, a full year of depreciation and amortization of properties acquired during 2002 and additional amortization from tenant improvements and leasing commissions incurred during 2003.

Administrative Expenses

Administrative expenses decreased by $0.3 million in 2003 primarily due decreased amortization on unvested restricted stock.

Equity in Income of Real Estate Ventures

Equity in income of Real Estate Ventures decreased by $0.9 million in 2003 primarily due to an impairment charge recorded during 2003 associated with the write-down the Company’s investment in a non-operating joint venture of $0.9 million.

Gains on Sales of Real Estate

Gains on sales of real estate increased by $20.5 million during 2003 primarily due to the Company’s sale of two office properties in December 2003 for $112.8 million that generated a gain of approximately $18.5 million. The Company sold the properties to a real estate venture in which it maintains a 20% interest. As a result, the results of operations of the properties are included in continuing operations.

Minority Interest

Discontinued Operations

Discontinued operations decreased by $4.5 million in 2003 primarily due to the timing of property sales for assets included in discontinued operations.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

General

Our principal liquidity needs for the next twelve months are as follows:

-41-

Back to Contents

•	fund normal recurring expenses,
•	meet debt service requirements,
•	fund capital expenditures, including capital and tenant improvements and leasing costs,
•	fund current development costs, including $88 million expected to fund continued development of Cira Centre in University City, Philadelphia, and
•	fund distributions declared by our Board of Trustees.

We believe that these needs will be satisfied using cash flows generated by operations and provided by financing activities. Rental revenue, recovery income from tenants, and other income from operations are our principal sources of cash used to pay operating expenses, debt service, recurring capital expenditures and the minimum distribution required to maintain our REIT qualification. We seek to increase cash flows from our existing properties by maintaining quality standards for our properties that promote high occupancy rates and permit increases in rental rates while reducing tenant turnover and controlling operating expenses. Our sources of revenue also include third-party fees generated by our property management, leasing, development and construction businesses. Consequently, we believe our revenue, together with proceeds from financing activities, will continue to provide the necessary funds for our short-term liquidity needs. However, material changes in these factors may adversely affect our net cash flows. Such changes, in turn, would adversely affect our ability to fund distributions, debt service payments and tenant improvements. In addition, a material adverse change in our cash provided by operations may affect the financial performance covenants under our unsecured Credit Facility and unsecured notes.

Our principal liquidity needs for periods beyond twelve months are for the costs of developments, redevelopments, property acquisitions, scheduled debt maturities, major renovations, expansions and other non-recurring capital improvements. We draw on multiple financing sources to fund our long-term capital needs. Our Credit Facility is utilized for general business purposes, including the acquisition, development and redevelopment of properties and the repayment of other debt. In the fourth quarter of 2004 we completed two offerings of unsecured notes and expect to utilize the debt market and common equity as capital sources for other long-term capital needs.

Cash Flows

The following summary discussion of our cash flows is based on the consolidated statement of cash flows and is not meant to be an all-inclusive discussion of the changes in our cash flows for the periods presented.

As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, we maintained cash and cash equivalents of $15.3 million and $8.5 million, an increase of $6.8 million. This increase was the result of the following changes in cash flow from our various activities:

Activity	2004			2003			2002

Operating	$	153,183		$	118,793		$	128,836
Investing		(682,945	)		(34,068	)		5,038
Financing		536,556			(102,974	)		(120,532	)

Net cash flows	$	6,794		$	(18,249	)	$	13,342

Our principal source of cash flows is from the operation of our Properties. Our increased cash flow from operating activities is primarily attributable to the net cash flow received from the operations of the TRC properties acquired in 2004. Additionally, over the past two years, we sold various properties and raised proceeds from equity issuances and unsecured debt financings.

We increased our investing activities in 2004 as compared to historical periods. Increased investing activity was comprised of our acquisition of the TRC Properties ($539.6 million), construction costs related to our Cira Centre development project ($89.1 million) and various other capital and tenant improvement projects (totaling $132.0 million in 2004).

-42-

Back to Contents

We increased our financing activities in 2004 as compared to historical periods. Increased financing activity was comprised of common and preferred share offerings (for aggregate net proceeds of $392.2 million) and proceeds from our unsecured note issuances in October and December 2004 (aggregate of $633.0 million net of discounts and issuance costs). These proceeds were used to repay existing indebtedness, redemption of preferred units, and to fund the investment activity discussed above.

Capitalization

Indebtedness

As of December 31, 2004, we had approximately $1.3 billion of outstanding indebtedness. The table below summarizes our mortgage notes payable, our unsecured notes, our unsecured term loan and our revolving credit facility at December 31, 2004 and 2003:

	December 31

	2004			2003

	(dollars in thousands)
*Balance:*
Fixed rate (a)	$	1,133,513		$	605,321
Variable rate		173,156			262,338

Total	$	1,306,669		$	867,659

*Percent of Total Debt:*
Fixed rate (a)		87	%		70	%
Variable rate		13	%		30	%

Total		100	%		100	%

*Weighted-average interest rate at period end:*
Fixed rate (a)		5.9	%		7.0	%
Variable rate		3.5	%		2.6	%

Total		5.6	%		5.5	%


(a)	Amounts include the hedged portions of our variable rate debt in 2003.

The variable rate debt shown above generally bears interest based on various spreads over LIBOR.

Unsecured Credit Facility

The Company utilizes credit facility borrowings for general business purposes, including the acquisition, development and redevelopment of properties and the repayment of other debt. In May 2004, the Company replaced its then existing credit facility with a $450 million unsecured credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) that matures in May 2007, subject to a one year extension option upon payment of a fee and absence any defaults at the time of the extension. Borrowings under the new Credit Facility generally bear interest at LIBOR (LIBOR was 2.4% as of December 31, 2004) plus a spread over LIBOR ranging from 0.65% to 1.20% based on the Company’s unsecured senior debt rating. The Company has an option to increase its maximum borrowings under the Credit Facility to $600 million subject to the absence of any defaults and our ability to acquire additional commitments from our existing lenders or new lenders. The Credit Facility contains various financial and non-financial covenants. As of December 31, 2004, the Company was in compliance with all such covenants.

As of December 31, 2004, the Company had $152.0 million of borrowings and $10.7 million of letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Facility, leaving $287.3 million of unused availability. For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company’s average interest rates, including the effects of interest rate hedges as discussed in Note 9 to the financial statements included herein and including both the new Credit Facility and prior credit facility, were 3.8% and 4.6% per annum.

-43-

Back to Contents

The Credit Facility contains provisions limiting: the incurrence of additional debt; the granting of liens; the consummation of mergers and consolidations; the disposition of assets and interests in subsidiaries; the making of loans and investments; and the payment of dividends. The restriction on dividends permits us to make distributions sufficient to pay dividends in the amount required for us to retain our qualification as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and otherwise limits dividends to 90% of the Company’s funds from operations, as defined in the Credit Facility.

The Credit Facility also contains financial covenants that require us to maintain a debt service coverage ratio, an interest coverage ratio, a fixed charge coverage ratio, an unsecured debt ratio and an unencumbered cash flow ratio above certain specified minimum levels; to maintain net worth above an amount determined on a specified formula; and to maintain a leverage ratio and a secured debt ratio below certain maximum levels. Another financial covenant limits the percentage of our total assets (on a consolidated basis) that can be held by subsidiaries not party to the Credit Facility.

The initial proceeds of the Credit Facility were used to repay all borrowings outstanding under our predecessor revolving credit facility, which was scheduled to mature in June 2004.

Unsecured Notes

During 2004, we issued an aggregate of $638 million of unsecured long-term debt, primarily to complete the financing of the TRC Properties and to repay a portion of our Credit Facility, in the following offerings:

•	On October 22, 2004, our Operating Partnership completed a public offering of $525 million in unsecured notes. The offering was completed through the issuance of $275 million in aggregate principal amount 4.5% unsecured notes due November 1, 2009 (the “2009 Notes”) and $250 million in aggregate principal amount 5.4% unsecured notes due November 1, 2014 (the “2014 Notes”). The 2009 Notes were priced at 99.87% of their principal amount to yield 4.5% and the 2014 Notes were priced at 99.50% of their principal amount to yield 5.4%. The net proceeds of the Notes were used to repay the $320 million 2007 Term Loan, to settle the treasury lock agreements for $3.2 million and to reduce borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility.

•	On December 26, 2004, our Operating Partnership sold $113 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.34% unsecured notes (the “2008 Notes”) due December 31, 2008 to a group of qualified institutional investors. The proceeds from these notes were used to repay the Company’s $113 million Term Loan.

The indenture relating to the 2009 and 2014 unsecured notes contains various financial restrictions and requirements, including (1) a leverage ratio not to exceed 60%, (2) a secured debt leverage ratio not to exceed 40%, (3) an debt service coverage ratio of greater than 1.5 to 1.0, and (4) an unencumbered asset value of not less than 150% of unsecured debt. In addition, the note purchase agreement relating to the 2008 Notes contains covenants that are similar to the above covenants. At December 31, 2004, the Company was in compliance with each of these financial restrictions and requirements.

Mortgage Indebtedness

The following table sets forth information regarding our mortgage indebtedness outstanding at December 31, 2004 and 2003:

-44-

Back to Contents

	Carrying value (in 000’s)
					Effective Interest Rate(a)
Property / Location	December 31, 2004		December 31, 2003		Effective Interest Rate(a)			Maturity Date

Grande B	$	80,429	$	81,704		7.48	%		Jul-27
Two Logan Square		78,793		—		5.78	%		Jul-09
Newtown Square/Berwyn Park/Libertyview		65,442		66,000		7.25	%		May-13
Midlantic Drive/Lenox Drive/DCC I		64,942		65,993		8.05	%		Oct-11
Grande A		62,177		63,526		7.48	%		Jul-27
Plymouth Meeting Exec.		47,513		48,299		7.00	%		Dec-10
Arboretum I, II, III & V		23,690		24,109		7.59	%		Jul-11
Grande A (a)		17,157		20,000		5.17	%		Jul-27
Six Tower Bridge		15,394		—		7.79	%		Aug-12
400 Commerce Drive		12,175		12,346		7.12	%		Jun-08
Four Tower Bridge		10,890		—		6.62	%		Feb-11
Croton Road		6,100		6,209		7.81	%		Jan-06
200 Commerce Drive		6,051		6,165		7.12	%		Jan-10
Southpoint III		5,877		6,257		7.75	%		Apr-14
440 & 442 Creamery Way		5,728		5,862		8.55	%		Jul-07
Norriton Office Center		5,270		5,342		8.50	%		Sep-07
429 Creamery Way		3,087		3,235		8.30	%		Sep-06
Grande A (a)		3,040		3,684		5.34	%		Jul-27
481 John Young Way		2,420		2,475		8.40	%		Nov-07
111 Arrandale Blvd		1,100		1,152		8.65	%		Aug-06
Interstate Center (a)		959		1,131		3.94	%		Mar-07
630 Allendale Road		—		19,797		—			—
400 Berwyn Park		—		15,726		—			—
1000 Howard Boulevard		—		3,647		—			—


Total mortgage indebtedness	$	518,234	$	462,659


(a)	For loans that bear interest at a variable rate, the rates in effect at December 31, 2004 have been presented.

Guaranties. As of December 31, 2004, we had guaranteed repayment of approximately $0.6 million of loans on behalf of certain Real Estate Ventures. See Item 2. Properties – Real Estate Ventures. We also provide customary environmental indemnities in connection with construction and permanent financing both for our own account and on behalf of Real Estate Ventures.

Equity Financing

In January 2004, the Company sold 2,645,000 Common Shares in an underwritten public offering for net proceeds (net of transaction costs) of approximately $69.2 million.

In February 2004, the Operating Partnership redeemed all of its outstanding Series B Preferred Units for an aggregate price of $93.0 million, together with accrued but unpaid distributions from January 1, 2004. The Series B Preferred Units had an aggregate stated value of $97.5 million and accrued distributions at 7.25% per annum. The Company recorded a gain of $4.5 million related to the redemption.

In February 2004, the Company sold 2,300,000 7.375% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, each with a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share, in an underwritten public offering for net proceeds (net of transaction costs) of $55.5 million.

In March 2004, the Company sold 1,840,000 Common Shares in an underwritten public offering for net proceeds (net of transaction costs) of $50.5 million.

In September 2004, the Company sold 7,750,000 Common Shares in an underwritten public offering for net proceeds (net of transaction costs) of $217.0 million.

-45-

Back to Contents

repurchase program, the Company has the authority to repurchase an additional 762,000 shares. No time limit has been placed on the duration of the share repurchase program. The following table summarizes the share repurchases during the three years ended December 31, 2004:

	Year ended December 31,

	2004		2003		2002

Repurchased amount (shares)		—		—		491,074
Repurchased amount ($, in thousands)	$	—	$	—	$	11,053
Average price per share	$	—	$	—	$	22.51

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company is not dependent on the use of any off-balance sheet financing arrangements for liquidity. The Company’s off-balance sheet arrangements are discussed in Note 4 to the financial statements: “Investment in Unconsolidated Real Estate Ventures”. Additional information about the debt of the Company’s unconsolidated Real Estate Ventures is included in “Item 2 – Properties”.

Inflation

A majority of the Company’s leases provide for reimbursement of real estate taxes and operating expenses either on a triple net basis or over a base amount. In addition, many of the office leases provide for fixed base rent increases. The Company believes that inflationary increases in expenses will be significantly offset by expense reimbursement and contractual rent increases.

Commitments

The following table outlines the timing of payment requirements related to the Company’s contractual commitments as of December 31, 2004:

	Payments by Period (in thousands)

	Total		Less than 1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		More than 5 Years

Mortgage notes payable (a)	$	510,526	$	8,643	$	43,078	$	99,645	$	359,160
Revolving credit facility		152,000		—		152,000		—		—
Unsecured debt (a)		638,000		—		—		388,000		250,000
Purchase commitments		11,000		11,000		—		—		—
Ground Leases		107,505		1,435		2,870		2,870		100,330
Other liabilities		1,525		837		—		—		688

	$	1,420,556	$	21,915	$	197,948	$	490,515	$	710,178


(a)	Amounts do not include unamortized discounts and/or premiums.

The Company intends to refinance its mortgage notes payable as they become due or repay those that are secured by properties being sold. The Company expects to renegotiate its Credit Facility prior to maturity or extend its term.

In 1998, we acquired a portfolio of properties from Donald E. Axinn and affiliates. Upon completion of our acquisition, Mr. Axinn joined our Board. The 1998 acquisition agreement provides for our acquisition in September 2005 of an approximately 141,724 square foot office building located at 101 Paragon Drive, Montvale, New Jersey for $11.0 million from an entity primarily owned and controlled by Mr. Axinn.

As part of our purchase of the TRC Properties in September 2004, the Operating Partnership agreed to issue to the sellers up to a maximum of $9.7 million of Class A Units of the Operating Partnership if certain of

-46-

Back to Contents

the acquired properties achieve at least 95% occupancy prior to September 21, 2007.

As part of the TRC Properties, we acquired our interest in Two Logan Square, a 696,477 square foot office building in Philadelphia, primarily through a second and third mortgage secured by this property. We currently do not expect to take title to Two Logan Square until, at the earliest, September 2019. In the event that we take title to Two Logan Square upon a foreclosure of our mortgage, we have agreed to make a payment to an unaffiliated third party with a residual interest in the fee owner of this property. The amount of the payment would be $0.6 million if we must pay a state and local transfer upon taking title, and $2.9 million if no transfer tax is payable upon the transfer.

As part of the TRC Properties and several of our other acquisitions, we agreed not to sell the acquired properties. In the case of the TRC Properties, we agreed not to sell the acquired properties for periods ranging from three to 15 years from the acquisition date as follows: 201 Radnor Financial Center, 555 Radnor Financial Center and 300 Delaware Avenue (three years); One Rodney Square and 130/150/170 Radnor Financial Center (10 years); and One Logan Square, Two Logan Square and Radnor Corporate Center (15 years). We also own 14 properties that aggregate 1.0 million square feet and have agreed not to sell these properties for periods that expire through 2008. These agreements generally provide that we may dispose of the subject Properties only in transactions that qualify as tax-free exchanges under Section 1031 of the Code or in other tax deferred transactions. In the event that we sell any of the properties within the applicable restricted period in non-exempt transactions, we have agreed to pay significant tax liabilities that would be incurred by the parties who sold us the applicable property.

We invest in our Properties and regularly incur capital expenditures in the ordinary course to maintain the Properties. We believe that such expenditures enhance the competitiveness of the Properties. We also enter into construction, utility and service contracts in the ordinary course of business which may extend beyond one year. These contracts include terms that provide for cancellation with insignificant or no cancellation penalties.

Interest Rate Risk and Sensitivity Analysis

The analysis below presents the sensitivity of the market value of the Company’s financial instruments to selected changes in market rates. The range of changes chosen reflects the Company’s view of changes which are reasonably possible over a one-year period. Market values are the present value of projected future cash flows based on the market rates chosen.

The Company’s financial instruments consist of both fixed and variable rate debt. As of December 31, 2004, the Company’s consolidated debt consisted of $497.1 million in fixed rate mortgages and $21.2 million in variable rate mortgage notes, $152.0 million borrowings under its Credit Facility and $636.4 million in unsecured notes (net of discounts). All financial instruments were entered into for other than trading purposes and the net market value of these financial instruments is referred to as the net financial position. Changes in interest rates have different impacts on the fixed and variable rate portions of the Company’s debt portfolio. A change in interest rates on the fixed portion of the debt portfolio impacts the net financial instrument position, but has no impact on interest incurred or cash flows. A change in interest rates on the variable portion of the debt portfolio impacts the interest incurred and cash flows, but does not impact the net financial instrument position.

If market rates of interest on our variable rate debt increase by 1%, the increase in annual interest expense on our variable rate debt would decrease future earnings and cash flows by approximately $1.7 million. If market rates of interest on our variable rate debt decrease by 1%, the decrease in interest expense on our variable rate debt would increase future earnings and cash flows by approximately $1.7 million.

-47-

Back to Contents

If market rates of interest increase by 1%, the fair value of our outstanding fixed-rate mortgage debt would decrease by approximately $30.9 million. If market rates of interest decrease by 1%, the fair value of our outstanding fixed-rate mortgage debt would increase by approximately $34.0 million.

As of December 31, 2004, based on prevailing interest rates and credit spreads, the fair value of our unsecured notes was $633.7 million.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

See discussion in Management’s Discussion and Analysis included in Item 7 herein.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The financial statements and supplementary financial data and the report thereon of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP with respect thereto are listed under Item 15(a) and filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. See Item 15.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

On May 23, 2002, the Company appointed KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) as its independent public accountants. On June 19, 2003, the Company informed KPMG that they would be dismissed effective as of June 19, 2003. The appointment of KPMG occurred on the same day as the dismissal of Arthur Andersen LLP as the Company’s independent public accountants.

The audit report of KPMG on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and was not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles, except that effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. During its audit for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, and for the subsequent interim period through June 25, 2003, (i) there were no disagreements with KPMG on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to KPMG’s satisfaction, would have caused KPMG to make reference to the subject matter of such disagreements in their reports, and (ii) there have been no reportable events as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

The Audit Committee authorized the dismissal of KPMG and appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. The Company retained PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as its independent registered public accounting firm effective June 19, 2003.

During the Company’s fiscal years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, and for the subsequent interim period through June 25, 2003, neither the Company nor anyone acting on behalf of the Company engaged PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP regarding any of the items described in Item 304(a)(2) of Regulation S-K.

A copy of KPMG’s letter dated June 25, 2003 with respect to certain of the above statements is attached as Exhibit 16.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 25, 2003.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our

-48-

Back to Contents

principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this annual report. There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the three-month period ended December 31, 2004 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f).

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2004.

Management has excluded our investments in Four and Six Tower Bridge Associates from its evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 because we do not have the ability to influence or modify the internal controls at the individual entities. Four and Six Tower Bridge Associates are two real estate partnerships, created prior to December 31, 2003, which we consolidate under Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation (FIN) 46R, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.” We started consolidating Four and Six Tower Bridge Associates on March 31, 2004. The total assets and total revenue of Four and Six Tower Bridge Associates represent, in the aggregate, 1% of our consolidated total assets and 1% of our consolidated total revenue as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004.

Our management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.

Item 9B. Other Information

PART III

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

Incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with respect to its Annual Meeting of Shareholders expected to be held on May 2, 2005.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

Incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with respect to its Annual Meeting of Shareholders expected to be held on May 2, 2005.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters

Incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with respect to its Annual Meeting of Shareholders expected to be held on May 2, 2005.

-49-

Back to Contents

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

Incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with respect to its Annual Meeting of Shareholders expected to be held on May 2, 2005.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with respect to its Annual Meeting of Shareholders expected to be held on May 2, 2005.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, and Financial Statement Schedules

(a) 1. and 2. Financial Statements and Schedules

The financial statements and schedules listed below are filed as part of this annual report on the pages indicated.

-50-

Back to Contents

Index to Financial Statements and Schedules

	Page

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-1

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003	F-3

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002	F-4

Consolidated Statements of Other Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002	F-5

Consolidated Statements of Beneficiaries’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002	F-6

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002	F-7

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-8

Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts	F-34

Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation	F-35

3. Exhibits

Exhibits No.		Description

3.1.1		Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of the Company (amended and restated as of May 12, 1997) (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated June 9, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference)
3.1.2		Articles of Amendment to Declaration of Trust of the Company (September 4, 1997) (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated September 10, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference)
3.1.3		Articles of Amendment to Declaration of Trust of the Company (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated June 3, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference)
3.1.4		Articles Supplementary to Declaration of Trust of the Company (September 28, 1998) (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated October 13, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference)
3.1.5		Articles of Amendment to Declaration of Trust of the Company (March 19, 1999) (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference)
3.1.6		Articles Supplementary to Declaration of Trust of the Company (April 19, 1999) (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated April 26, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference)
3.1.7		Articles Supplementary to Declaration of Trust of the Company (December 30, 2003) (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-A dated December 29, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference)
3.1.8		Articles Supplementary to Declaration of Trust of the Company (February 5, 2004) (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-A dated February 5, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference)
3.2		Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated October 14, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference)
4.1		Form of 7.50% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Share Certificate (previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-A dated December 29, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference)
4.2		Form of 7.375% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Share Certificate (previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-A dated February 5, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference)
4.3		Indenture dated October 22, 2004 by and among Brandywine Operating Partnership, L.P., Brandywine Realty Trust, certain wholly-owned subsidiaries of Brandywine Operating Partnership, L.P. named therein and The Bank of New York, as Trustee (previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated October 22, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference)
4.4		Form of $275,000,000 4.50% Guaranteed Note due 2009 (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated October 22, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference)

-51-

Back to Contents

Exhibits No.		Description

4.5		Form of $250,000,000 5.40% Guaranteed Note due 2014 (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated October 22, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.1		Second Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement of Brandywine Realty Services Partnership (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration statement of Form S-11 (File No. 33-4175) and incorporated herein by reference)
10.2		Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Brandywine Realty Services Corporation (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.3		Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Brandywine Operating Partnership, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”) (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated December 17, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.4		First Amendment to Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated December 17, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.5		Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership Agreement of the Operating Partnership (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated April 13, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.6		Third Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated May 14, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.7		Fourth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated October 13, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.8		Fifth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated October 13, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.9		Sixth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated October 13, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.10		Seventh Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.11		Eighth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.12		Ninth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.13		Tenth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.14		Eleventh Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.15		Twelfth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.16		Thirteenth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated September 21, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.17		Tax Indemnification Agreement dated May 8, 1998, by and between the Operating Partnership and the parties identified on the signature page (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated May 14, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.18		Contribution Agreement dated as of July 10, 1998 (Axinn) (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated July 30, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.19		Form of Donald E. Axinn Options ** (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated July 30, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.20		First Amendment to Contribution Agreement (Axinn) (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated October 13, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.21		Agreement dated as of December 31, 2001 with Anthony A. Nichols, Sr. ** (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated October 14, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.22		Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of February 9, 2005 of Gerard H. Sweeney** (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated February 11, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference)

-52-

Back to Contents

Exhibits No.		Description

10.23		Amended and Restated Non-Qualified Stock Option Award to Anthony A. Nichols, Sr. ** (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.24		Amended and Restated Non-Qualified Stock Option Award to Gerard H. Sweeney ** (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.25		Third Amendment to Restricted Share Award to Gerard H. Sweeney.** (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.26		Restricted Share Award to Anthony S. Rimikis.** (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.27		Restricted Share Award to Gerard H. Sweeney ** (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.28		Fourth Amendment to Restricted Share Award to Gerard H. Sweeney** (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.29		Restricted Share Award to Gerard H. Sweeney** (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.30		Restricted Share Award to Anthony S. Rimikis** (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.31		Restricted Share Award to H. Jeffrey De Vuono** (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.32		Restricted Share Award to George Sowa** (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.33		2002 Restricted Share Award for Gerard H. Sweeney** (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.34		2002 Form of Restricted Share Award for Executive Officers (other than the President and Chief Executive Officer)** (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.35		Credit Agreement dated as of May 24, 2004 (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated May 24, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.36		Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement dated as of September 10, 2004 (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated September 13, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.37		2002 Restricted Share Award to Christopher P. Marr** (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated August 27, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.38		2002 Non-Qualified Option to Gerard H. Sweeney** (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.39		Executive Deferred Compensation Plan** (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.40		Executive Deferred Compensation Plan** (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated ended December 22, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.41		2003 Restricted Share Award to Gerard H. Sweeney** (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.42		2003 Restricted Share Award to Anthony S. Rimikis** (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.43		2003 Restricted Share Award to H. Jeffrey DeVuono** (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.44		2003 Restricted Share Award to George D. Sowa** (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.45		2003 Restricted Share Award to Brad A. Molotsky** (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.46		2003 Restricted Share Award to Christopher P. Marr** (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.47		Letter to Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc. (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.48		Redemption and Conversion Agreement with Five Arrows Realty Securities III L.L.C. (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated December 29, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.49		Purchase Agreement with Commonwealth Atlantic Operating Properties Inc. (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated February 3, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.50		Contribution Agreement dated August 18, 2004 with TRC Realty, Inc.-GP, TRC-LB LLC and TRC Associates Limited Partnership (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated August 19, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.51		Registration Rights Agreement (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated September 21, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.52		Tax Protection Agreement (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated September 21, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.53		Term Loan Credit Agreement (2007) (previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated September 21, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference)

-53-

Back to Contents

Exhibits No.		Description

10.54		Term Loan Credit Agreement (2008) (previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated September 21, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.55		Note Purchase Agreement dated as of November 15, 2004 (previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated November 15, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.56		Sales Agreement with Brinson Patrick Securities Corporation (previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated November 29, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.57		2004 Restricted Share Award to Gerard H. Sweeney**(previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.58		Form of 2004 Restricted Share Award to executive officers (other than the President and Chief Executive Officer)** (previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.59		Form of 2004 Restricted Share Award to non-executive trustees**(previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.60		Form of 2004 Restricted Share Award to non-executive trustee (Wyche Fowler)**(previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated December 22, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.61		Amended and Restated Agreement dated as of March 25, 2004 with Anthony A. Nichols, Sr.**(previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.62		2005 Restricted Share Award to Gerard H. Sweeney**(previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated February 11, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.63		Form of 2005 Restricted Share Award to executive officers (other than the President and Chief Executive Officer)** (previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated February 11, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.64		Form of Severance Agreement for executive officers** (previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated February 11, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.65		Summary of Trustee Compensation**
12.1		Statement re Computation of Ratios
14.1		Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated December 22, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference)
21.1		List of Subsidiaries of the Company
23.1		Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
31.1		Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
31.2		Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
32.1		Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
32.2		Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

** Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

-54-

Back to Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST

	By: /s/ GERARD H. SWEENEY

	Gerard H. Sweeney President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: March 14, 2005

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature	Title	Date

/s/ WALTER D’ALESSIO	Chairman of the Board and Trustee	March 14, 2005

Walter D’Alessio

/s/ GERARD H. SWEENEY	President, Chief Executive Officer and Trustee (Principal Executive Officer)	March 14, 2005

Gerard H. Sweeney

/s/ CHRISTOPHER P. MARR	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)	March 14, 2005

Christopher P. Marr

/s/ TIMOTHY M. MARTIN	Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)	March 14, 2005

Timothy M. Martin

/s/ D. PIKE ALOIAN	Trustee	March 14, 2005

D. Pike Aloian

/s/ DONALD E. AXINN	Trustee	March 14, 2005

Donald E. Axinn

/s/ WYCHE FOWLER	Trustee	March 14, 2005

Wyche Fowler

/s/ MICHAEL J. JOYCE	Trustee	March 14, 2005

Michael J. Joyce

/s/ ANTHONY A. NICHOLS, SR.	Trustee	March 14, 2005

Anthony A. Nichols, Sr.

/s/ CHARLES P. PIZZI	Trustee	March 14, 2005

Charles P. Pizzi

-55-

Back to Index

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Trustees and Shareholders

Of Brandywine Realty Trust:

We have completed an integrated audit of Brandywine Realty Trust’s 2004 consolidated financial statements and of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 and audits of its 2003 and 2002 consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Our opinions, based on our audits, are presented below.

Consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules:

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(1) and (2) present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Brandywine Realty Trust and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) at December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedules listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(1) and (2) present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedules based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit of financial statements includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Internal control over financial reporting:

Also, in our opinion, management’s assessment, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A, that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on those criteria. Furthermore, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the COSO. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on management’s assessment and on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. An audit of internal control over financial reporting includes obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we consider necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over

F - 1

Back to Contents

financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

As described in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, management has excluded the Company’s investments in Four and Six Tower Bridge Associates from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 because the Company does not have the ability to influence or modify the internal controls at the individual entities. Four and Six Tower Bridge are two real estate partnerships, created prior to December 31, 2003, which the Company started consolidating under Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation (FIN) 46R, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” on March 31, 2004. We have also excluded Four and Six Tower Bridge Associates from our audit of internal control over financial reporting. Four and Six Tower Bridge are two consolidated real estate partnerships whose total assets and total revenues represent, in the aggregate, 1% of the Company’s consolidated total assets and 1% of the Company’s consolidated total revenue of and for the year ended December 31, 2004.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

March 14, 2005

F - 2

Back to Index

BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share information)

	December 31,

	2004			2003

ASSETS
Real estate investments:
Operating properties	$	2,483,134		$	1,869,744
Accumulated depreciation		(325,802	)		(268,091	)

Operating real estate investments, net		2,157,332			1,601,653
Construction-in-progress		145,016			29,787
Land held for development		61,517			63,915

Total real estate investments, net		2,363,865			1,695,355
Cash and cash equivalents		15,346			8,552
Escrowed cash		17,980			14,388
Accounts receivable, net		11,999			5,206
Accrued rent receivable, net		32,641			26,652
Marketable securities		423			12,052
Assets held for sale		—			5,317
Investment in real estate ventures, at equity		12,754			15,853
Deferred costs, net		34,449			26,071
Intangible assets, net		101,056			7,433
Other assets		43,471			38,897

Total assets	$	2,633,984		$	1,855,776

LIABILITIES AND BENEFICIARIES’ EQUITY
Mortgage notes payable	$	518,234		$	462,659
Unsecured notes		636,435			—
Unsecured credit facility		152,000			305,000
Unsecured term loan		—			100,000
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		49,242			30,290
Distributions payable		27,363			20,947
Tenant security deposits and deferred rents		20,046			16,123
Acquired below market leases, net of accumulated amortization of $2,341 and $869		39,271			1,305
Other liabilities		1,525			14,055
Liabilities related to assets held for sale		—			52

Total liabilities		1,444,116			950,431
Minority interest		42,866			133,488
Commitments and contingencies (Note 23)
Beneficiaries’ equity:
Preferred Shares (shares authorized-10,000,000):
7.25% Series A Preferred Shares, $0.01 par value; issued and outstanding- no shares in 2004 and 750,000 in 2003		—			8
7.50% Series C Preferred Shares, $0.01 par value; issued and outstanding- 2,000,000 in 2004 and 2003		20			20
7.375% Series D Preferred Shares, $0.01 par value; issued and outstanding- 2,300,000 in 2004 and no shares in 2003		23			—
Common Shares of beneficial interest, $0.01 par value; shares authorized 100,000,000; issued and outstanding-55,292,752 in 2004 and 41,040,710 in 2003		553			410
Additional paid-in capital		1,346,651			936,730
Share warrants		—			401
Cumulative earnings		370,515			310,212
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(3,130	)		(2,158	)
Cumulative distributions		(567,630	)		(473,766	)

Total beneficiaries’ equity		1,147,002			771,857

Total liabilities and beneficiaries’ equity	$	2,633,984		$	1,855,776

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 3

Back to Index

BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share information)

	Years ended December 31,

	2004			2003			2002

Revenue:
Rents	$	275,631		$	256,616		$	247,350
Tenant reimbursements		37,572			37,518			33,061
Other		10,389			7,330			6,301

Total revenue		323,592			301,464			286,712
Operating Expenses:
Property operating expenses		89,857			80,244			74,815
Real estate taxes		31,062			27,681			25,019
Depreciation and amortization		79,904			60,332			55,925
Administrative expenses		15,100			14,464			14,804

Total operating expenses		215,923			182,721			170,563

Operating income		107,669			118,743			116,149
Other Income (Expense):
Interest income		2,469			3,629			3,399
Interest expense		(55,061	)		(57,835	)		(63,522	)
Equity in income of real estate ventures		2,024			52			987
Net gains on sales of interest in real estate		2,975			20,537			5

Income before minority interest		60,076			85,126			57,018
Minority interest attributable to continuing operations		(2,472	)		(9,294	)		(9,375	)

Income from continuing operations		57,604			75,832			47,643
Discontinued operations:
Income from discontinued operations		(336	)		1,651			7,561
Net gain on disposition of discontinued operations		3,136			9,690			8,557
Minority interest		(101	)		(495	)		(777	)

Income from discontinued operations		2,699			10,846			15,341

Net income		60,303			86,678			62,984
Income allocated to Preferred Shares		(9,720	)		(11,906	)		(11,906	)
Preferred Share redemption/conversion benefit (charge)		4,500			(20,598	)		—

Income allocated to Common Shares	$	55,083		$	54,174		$	51,078

Basic earnings per Common Share:
Continuing operations	$	1.09		$	1.14		$	0.97
Discontinued operations		0.06			0.29			0.43

	$	1.15		$	1.43		$	1.40

Diluted earnings per Common Share:
Continuing operations	$	1.09		$	1.14		$	0.96
Discontinued operations		0.06			0.29			0.43

	$	1.15		$	1.43		$	1.39

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 4

Back to Index

BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands)

	Years ended December 31,

	2004			2003			2002

Net Income	$	60,303		$	86,678		$	62,984
Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative financial instruments		309			(1,117	)		(7,954	)
Settlement of treasury locks		(3,238	)		—			—
Reclassification of realized losses on derivative financial instruments to operations		2,809			5,311			5,406
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities		(696	)		—			—
Reclassification of realized (gains) losses on available for sale securities to operations		(156	)		50			733

Total other comprehensive income		(972	)		4,244			(1,815	)

Comprehensive Income	$	59,331		$	90,922		$	61,169

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 5

Back to Index

BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF BENEFICIARIES’ EQUITY
For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(in thousands, except number of shares)

	Number of Preferred A Shares			Par Value of Preferred A Shares			Number of Preferred B Shares			Par Value of Preferred B Shares			Number of Preferred C Shares		Par Value of Preferred C Shares		Number of Preferred D Shares

BALANCE, December 31, 2001		750,000		$	8			4,375,000		$	44			—	$	—		—
Net income
Other comprehensive income
Vesting of Restricted Stock
Repurchase of Common Shares
Payment/forgiveness of employee stock loans
Accretion of Preferred Share discount
Amortization of stock options
Exercise of warrants/options
Preferred Share distributions
Distributions ($1.76 per share)

BALANCE, December 31, 2002		750,000		$	8			4,375,000		$	44			—	$	—		—
Net income
Other comprehensive income
Vesting of Restricted Stock
Issuance of Preferred Shares														2,000,000		20
Conversion of Preferred Shares								(1,093,750	)		(11	)
Redemption of Preferred Shares								(3,281,250	)		(33	)
Issuance of Common Shares
Conversion of Class A minority interest units
Payment/forgiveness of employee stock loans
Accretion of Preferred Share discount
Amortization of stock options
Preferred Share distributions
Distributions ($1.76 per share)

BALANCE, December 31, 2003		750,000		$	8			—		$	—			2,000,000	$	20		—
Net income
Other comprehensive income
Vesting of Restricted Stock
Issuance of Preferred Shares																		2,300,000
Conversion of Preferred Series A Shares		(750,000	)		(8	)
Redemption of Preferred Units
Issuance of Common Shares
Issuance of trustee/bonus shares
Payment of employee stock loans
Exercise of warrants/options
Amortization of stock options
Preferred Share distributions
Distributions ($1.76 per share)

BALANCE, December 31, 2004		—		$	—			—		$	—			2,000,000	$	20		2,300,000

	Par Value of Preferred D Shares		Number of Common Shares			Par Value of Common Shares			Additional Paid in Capital			Employee Stock Loans

BALANCE, December 31, 2001	$	—		35,640,935		$	356		$	853,912		$	(5,699	)
Net income
Other comprehensive income
Vesting of Restricted Stock				76,454			1			1,895
Repurchase of Common Shares				(491,074	)		(5	)		(11,048	)
Payment/forgiveness of employee stock loans													1,658
Accretion of Preferred Share discount										1,476
Amortization of stock options										43
Exercise of warrants/options										(578	)
Preferred Share distributions
Distributions ($1.76 per share)

BALANCE, December 31, 2002	$	—		35,226,315		$	352		$	845,700		$	(4,041	)
Net income
Other comprehensive income
Vesting of Restricted Stock				82,912			1			1,767
Issuance of Preferred Shares										47,892
Conversion of Preferred Shares				1,093,750			11			3,828
Redemption of Preferred Shares										(74,647	)
Issuance of Common Shares				4,587,500			46			110,936
Conversion of Class A minority interest units				50,233			—			1,206
Payment/forgiveness of employee stock loans													2,509
Accretion of Preferred Share discount										1,476
Amortization of stock options										104
Preferred Share distributions
Distributions ($1.76 per share)

BALANCE, December 31, 2003	$	—		41,040,710		$	410		$	938,262		$	(1,532	)
Net income
Other comprehensive income
Vesting of Restricted Stock				88,406			1			1,642
Issuance of Preferred Shares		23								55,515
Conversion of Preferred Series A Shares				1,339,286			13			(6	)
Redemption of Preferred Units
Issuance of Common Shares				12,235,000			122			336,562
Issuance of trustee/bonus shares				2,191			—			55
Payment of employee stock loans													1,112
Exercise of warrants/options				587,159			6			14,940
Amortization of stock options										102
Preferred Share distributions
Distributions ($1.76 per share)

BALANCE, December 31, 2004	$	23		55,292,752		$	552		$	1,347,072		$	(420	)

	Share Warrants			Cumulative Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Cumulative Distributions			Total

BALANCE, December 31, 2001	$	401		$	163,502		$	(4,587	)	$	(299,781	)	$	708,156
Net income					62,984									62,984
Other comprehensive income								(1,815	)					(1,815	)
Vesting of Restricted Stock														1,896
Repurchase of Common Shares														(11,053	)
Payment/forgiveness of employee stock loans														1,658
Accretion of Preferred Share discount					(1,476	)								—
Amortization of stock options														43
Exercise of warrants/options														(578	)
Preferred Share distributions											(11,906	)		(11,906	)
Distributions ($1.76 per share)											(62,942	)		(62,942	)

BALANCE, December 31, 2002	$	401		$	225,010		$	(6,402	)	$	(374,629	)	$	686,443
Net income					86,678									86,678
Other comprehensive income								4,244						4,244
Vesting of Restricted Stock														1,768
Issuance of Preferred Shares														47,912
Conversion of Preferred Shares											(3,828	)		—
Redemption of Preferred Shares											(16,770	)		(91,450	)
Issuance of Common Shares														110,982
Conversion of Class A minority interest units														1,206
Payment/forgiveness of employee stock loans														2,509
Accretion of Preferred Share discount					(1,476	)								—
Amortization of stock options														104
Preferred Share distributions											(11,906	)		(11,906	)
Distributions ($1.76 per share)											(66,633	)		(66,633	)

BALANCE, December 31, 2003	$	401		$	310,212		$	(2,158	)	$	(473,766	)	$	771,857
Net income					60,303									60,303
Other comprehensive income								(972	)					(972	)
Vesting of Restricted Stock														1,643
Issuance of Preferred Shares														55,538
Conversion of Preferred Series A Shares														(1	)
Redemption of Preferred Units											4,500			4,500
Issuance of Common Shares														336,684
Issuance of trustee/bonus shares														55
Payment of employee stock loans														1,112
Exercise of warrants/options		(401	)											14,545
Amortization of stock options														102
Preferred Share distributions											(9,720	)		(9,720	)
Distributions ($1.76 per share)											(88,644	)		(88,644	)

BALANCE, December 31, 2004	$	—		$	370,515		$	(3,130	)	$	(567,630	)	$	1,147,002

F - 6

Back to Index

BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)

	Years ended December 31,

	2004			2003			2002

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	60,303		$	86,678		$	62,984
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:
Depreciation		64,175			54,353			52,944
Amortization:
Deferred financing costs		5,088			2,304			1,795
Deferred leasing costs		7,841			7,032			5,820
Deferred market rents		(406	)		(287	)		(459	)
Assumed lease intangibles		8,112			177			256
Deferred compensation costs		2,114			2,869			3,182
Straight-line rental income		(6,023	)		(5,917	)		(5,930	)
Provision for doubtful accounts		467			189			894
Net gain on sales of interests in real estate		(6,111	)		(30,227	)		(8,562	)
Impairment loss on assets held-for-sale		—			—			665
Minority interest		2,573			9,789			10,152
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(1,769	)		(1,462	)		2,582
Other assets		9,840			(4,674	)		10,674
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		3,199			1,911			(6,040	)
Tenant security deposits and deferred rents		3,750			(2,432	)		(521	)
Other liabilities		30			(1,510	)		(1,600	)

Net cash from operating activities		153,183			118,793			128,836
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition of properties		(569,343	)		(67,490	)		(25,146	)
Sales of properties, net		22,283			87,461			78,019
Capital expenditures and real estate development costs		(131,998	)		(50,885	)		(38,787	)
Investment in real estate ventures		(233	)		(521	)		(446	)
Increase in escrowed cash		(1,320	)		1,930			2,553
Cash distributions from real estate ventures in excess of income		1,109			3,258			1,969
Increase in cash due to consolidation of VIE’s		426			—			—
Proceeds from repayment of mortgage notes receivable		6,470			—			—
Leasing costs		(10,339	)		(7,821	)		(13,124	)

Net cash from investing activities		(682,945	)		(34,068	)		5,038
Cash flows from financing activites:
Proceeds (repayments) of Credit Facilities, net		(153,000	)		(2,000	)		(87,325	)
Proceeds from Unsecured Term Loans		433,000			—			100,000
Repayments of Unsecured Term Loans		(533,000	)		—			—
Proceeds from mortgage notes payable		—			—			20,186
Repayment of mortgage notes payable		(50,165	)		(82,131	)		(48,646	)
Proceeds from Unsecured Notes		636,398			—			—
Debt financing costs		(13,580	)		(112	)		(658	)
Repayments on employee stock loans		1,112			2,509			1,658
Proceeds from issuances of shares, net		406,767			159,107			—
Redemption of Preferred Shares		—			(91,422	)		—
Repurchases of Common Shares and minority interest units		(95,436	)		—			(20,165	)
Distributions paid to shareholders		(90,457	)		(78,754	)		(75,022	)
Distributions to minority interest holders		(5,083	)		(10,171	)		(10,560	)

Net cash from financing activities		536,556			(102,974	)		(120,532	)

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		6,794			(18,249	)		13,342
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		8,552			26,801			13,459

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	15,346		$	8,552		$	26,801

Supplemental disclosure:
Cash paid for interest, net of capitalized interest	$	43,281		$	52,645		$	61,814
Debt assumed in asset acquisitions		79,330			—			68,431
Class A Units issued in asset acquisitions		10,000			—			—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F - 7

Back to Index

BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2004, 2003 AND 2002

1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS

Brandywine Realty Trust, a Maryland real estate investment trust (collectively with its subsidiaries, the “Company”), is a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust (a “REIT”) active in acquiring, developing, redeveloping, leasing and managing office and industrial properties. As of December 31, 2004, the Company’s portfolio included 222 office properties, 23 industrial facilities and one mixed-use property (collectively, the “Properties”) that contained an aggregate of approximately 19.2 million net rentable square feet. The Properties are located in the office and industrial markets in and surrounding Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Richmond, Virginia. As of December 31, 2004, we held economic interests in nine unconsolidated real estate ventures that contain approximately 1.6 million net rentable square feet (the “Real Estate Ventures”) formed with third parties to develop or own commercial properties. In addition, we own interests in two consolidated real estate ventures that own two office properties containing approximately 0.2 million net rentable square feet.

The Company owns its assets through Brandywine Operating Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Operating Partnership”). The Company is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership and, as of December 31, 2004, owned a 96.4% interest in the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership owns a 95% interest in a taxable REIT subsidiary, Brandywine Realty Services Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation (the “Management Company”), that, as of December 31, 2004, was performing management and leasing services for properties containing an aggregate of approximately 22.7 million net rentable square feet, of which approximately 19.2 million net rentable square feet related to properties owned by the Company and approximately 3.5 million net rentable square feet related to properties owned by third parties. The remaining 5% of the Management Company is owned by a partnership comprised of a current executive and former executive of the Company, each of whom is a member of our Board of Trustees.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include all accounts of the Company, its majority-owned and/or controlled subsidiaries, which consist principally of the Operating Partnership. The portion of these entities not owned by the Company is presented as minority interest as of and during the periods consolidated. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

When the Company obtains an economic interest in an entity, the Company evaluates the entity to determine if the entity is deemed a VIE, and if the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary, in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 46R, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (“FIN 46R”). The Company consolidates the entities that are VIEs and the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE or non-VIEs which the company controls. For entities where the Company is not deemed to be the primary beneficiary or the entity is not deemed a VIE and the Company’s ownership is 50% or less and has the ability to exercise significant influence are accounted for under the equity method, i.e. at cost, increased or decreased by the Company’s share of earnings or losses, less distributions. The Company will reconsider its determination of whether an entity is a VIE and who the primary beneficiary is if certain events occur that are likely to cause a change in the original determinations.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial

F - 8

Back to Contents

statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Management makes significant estimates regarding revenue, impairment of long-lived assets, allowance for doubtful accounts and deferred costs.

Operating Properties

Operating properties are carried at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. The cost of operating properties reflects their purchase price or development cost. Costs incurred for the acquisition and renovation of an operating property are capitalized to the Company’s investment in that property. Ordinary repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred; major replacements and betterments, which improve or extend the life of the asset, are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Fully-depreciated assets are removed from the accounts.

Purchase Price Allocation

The Company allocates the purchase price of properties to net tangible and identified intangible assets acquired based on fair values. Above-market and below-market in-place lease values for acquired properties are recorded based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (ii) the Company’s estimate of the fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancellable term of the lease. Capitalized above-market lease values are amortized as a reduction of rental income over the remaining non-cancellable terms of the respective leases. Capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an increase to rental income over the remaining non-cancellable terms of the respective leases, including any fixed-rate renewal periods.

Other intangible assets also include amounts representing the value of tenant relationships and in-place leases based on the Company’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and the Company’s overall relationship with the respective tenant. The Company estimates the cost to execute leases with terms similar to the remaining lease terms of the in-place leases, include leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses. This intangible asset is amortized to expense over the remaining term of the respective leases. Company estimates of value are made using methods similar to those used by independent appraisers or by using independent appraisals. Factors considered by the Company in their analysis include an estimate of the carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. The Company also considers information obtained about each property as a result of its pre-acquisition due diligence, marketing and leasing activities in estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired. In estimating carrying costs, the Company includes real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the expected lease-up periods, which primarily range from three to twelve months.

Characteristics considered by the Company in allocating value to its tenant relationships include the nature and extent of the Company’s business relationship with the tenant, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant, the tenant’s credit quality and expectations of lease renewals, among other factors. The value of tenant relationship intangibles is amortized over the remaining initial lease term and expected renewals, but in no event longer than the remaining depreciable life of the building. The value of in-place leases is amortized over the remaining non-cancellable term of the respective leases and any fixed-rate renewal periods.

F - 9

Back to Contents

Depreciation and Amortization

The costs of buildings and improvements are depreciated using the straight-line method based on the following useful lives: buildings and improvements (five to 40 years) and tenant improvements (the shorter of the lease term or the life of the asset).

Effective January 1, 2002, the Company changed the estimated useful lives of various buildings from 25 to 40 years. This change resulted in an increase of net income of $19.0 million or $.53 per share for the year ended December 31, 2002. Management determined the longer period to be a better estimate of the useful lives of the buildings.

Construction in Progress

Project costs directly associated with the development and construction of a real estate project are capitalized as construction in progress. In addition, interest, real estate taxes and general and administrative expenses that are directly associated with the Company’s development activities are capitalized until the property is placed in service. Direct construction costs totaling $3.0 million in 2004, $1.7 million in 2003 and $2.2 million in 2002 and interest totaling $3.0 million in 2004, $1.5 million in 2003 and $2.9 million in 2002 were capitalized related to development of certain Properties and land holdings.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 144 (“SFAS 144”), Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, provides a single accounting model for long-lived assets as held-for-sale, broadens the scope of businesses to be disposed of that qualify for reporting as discontinued operations and changes the timing of recognizing losses on such operations. The Company adopted SFAS 144 on January 1, 2002.

In accordance with SFAS 144, long-lived assets, such as real estate investments and purchased intangibles subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of are separately presented in the balance sheet and reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell, and are no longer depreciated. The other assets and liabilities related to assets classified as held-for-sale are presented separately in the consolidated balance sheet. For the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company recorded a $0.7 million impairment charge associated with an asset held-for-sale.

F - 10

Back to Contents

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents are highly-liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. The Company maintains cash equivalents in financial institutions in excess of insured limits, but believes this risk is mitigated by only investing in or through major financial institutions.

During the three years ended December 31, 2004, the Company had non-cash conversion of preferred shares as more fully discussed in Note 14.

Escrowed Cash

Restricted cash consists of cash held as collateral to provide credit enhancement for the Company’s mortgage debt, cash for property taxes, capital expenditures and tenant improvements.

Accounts Receivable

Leases with tenants are accounted for as operating leases. Minimum annual rentals under tenant leases are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related lease. The cumulative difference between lease revenue recognized under the straight-line method and contractual lease payment terms is recorded as “accrued rent receivable” on the accompanying balance sheets. Included in current tenant receivables are tenant reimbursements which are comprised of amounts recoverable from tenants for common area maintenance expenses and certain other recoverable expenses that are recognized as revenue in the period in which the related expenses are incurred. As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, no tenant represents more than 10% of accounts receivable.

Tenant receivables and accrued rent receivables are carried net of the allowances for doubtful accounts of $1.4 million and $2.7 million in 2004 and $1.5 million and $2.5 million in 2003. The allowance is an estimate based on two calculations that are combined to determine the total amount reserved. First, the Company evaluates specific accounts where it has determined that a tenant may have an inability to meet its financial obligations. In these situations, the Company uses its judgment, based on the facts and circumstances, and records a specific reserve for that tenant against amounts due to reduce the receivable to the amount that the Company expects to collect. These reserves are reevaluated and adjusted as additional information becomes available. Second, a reserve is established for all tenants based on a range of percentages applied to receivable aging categories. These percentages are based on historical collection and write-off experience. If the financial condition of the Company’s tenants were to deteriorate, additional allowances may be required.

Marketable Securities

The Company accounts for its investments in equity securities according to the provisions of SFAS 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, which requires securities classified as “available-for-sale” to be stated at fair value. Adjustments to fair value of available-for-sale securities are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income (loss). A decline in the market value of equity securities below cost that is deemed to be other than temporary results in a reduction in the carrying amount to fair value. The impairment is charged to earnings and a new cost basis for the security is established.

Investments in Unconsolidated Real Estate Ventures

The Company accounts for its investments in unconsolidated Real Estate Ventures under the equity method of accounting as the Company exercises significant influence, but does not control these entities under the provisions of the entities’ governing agreements. These investments are recorded initially at cost, as Investments in Real Estate Ventures, and subsequently adjusted for equity in earnings and cash contributions and distributions.

On a periodic basis, management assesses whether there are any indicators that the value of the Company’s investments in unconsolidated Real Estate Ventures may be impaired. An investment is impaired only if management’s estimate of the value of the investment is less than the carrying value of the investment. To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss shall be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the investment over the value of the investment. During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $0.9 million associated with an investment in a non-operating Real Estate Venture.

F - 11

Back to Contents

Deferred Costs

Costs incurred in connection with property leasing are capitalized as deferred leasing costs. Deferred leasing costs consist primarily of leasing commissions that are amortized on the straight-line method over the life of the respective lease which generally ranges from one to 15 years. Management re-evaluates the remaining useful lives of leasing costs as economic and market conditions change.

Costs incurred in connection with debt financing are capitalized as deferred financing costs and charged to interest expense over the terms of the related debt agreements. Deferred financing costs consist primarily of loan fees which are amortized over the related loan term.

Other Assets

As of December 31, 2004, other assets included a direct financing lease of $15.7 million, prepaid real estate taxes of $7.5 million, deposits on properties to be purchased in 2005 totaling $3.3 million, cash surrender value of life insurance of $6.1 million, mortgage notes receivable of $4.4 million, furniture, fixtures and equipment of $2.2 million and $4.3 million of other assets. As of December 31, 2003, other assets included a direct financing lease of $16.1 million, prepaid real estate taxes of $5.4 million, deposits on properties to be purchased in 2004 totaling $8.6 million, cash surrender value of life insurance of $3.7 million and $5.1 million of other assets.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash, accounts receivable, other assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses, and borrowings under variable rate debt instruments approximate fair value. Accordingly, these items have been excluded from the fair value disclosures.

Revenue Recognition

Rental revenue is recognized on the straight-line basis from the later of the date of the commencement of the lease or the date of acquisition of the property subject to existing leases, which averages minimum rents over the terms of the leases. The cumulative difference between lease revenue recognized under this method and contractual lease payment terms is recorded as “accrued rent receivable” on the accompanying balance sheets. The straight-line rent adjustment increased revenue by approximately $6.0 million in 2004, $5.9 million in 2003 and $5.9 million in 2002. The leases also typically provide for tenant reimbursement of a portion of common area maintenance and other operating expenses. Other income is recorded when earned and is primarily comprised of termination fees received from tenants, bankruptcy settlement fees, third party leasing commissions, and third party management fees. During 2004, 2003, and 2002, the Company earned $1.5 million, $3.5 million, and $2.3 million in termination fees. In 2004, the Company recorded approximately $1.0 million plus accrued interest as other income relating to the settlement of litigation. Additionally, during 2004, the Company recorded approximately $0.9 million in other income from the favorable settlement of an accrued liability. Deferred rents represents rental revenue received from tenants prior to their due dates.

No tenant represented greater than 10% of the Company’s rental revenue in 2004, 2003 or 2002.

Income Taxes

The Company elects to be taxed as a real estate investment trust under Sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code. In management’s opinion, the requirements to maintain this election are being met. Accordingly, no provision for federal income taxes has been reflected in the consolidated financial statements.

Earnings and profits, which determine the taxability of distributions to shareholders, differ from net income reported for financial reporting purposes due to differences in cost basis, the estimated useful lives used to compute depreciation, and the allocation of net income and loss for financial versus tax reporting purposes. The tax basis in the Company’s assets was $1.8 billion as of December 31, 2004 and $1.4 billion as of December 31, 2003.

F - 12

Back to Contents

The Company is subject to a 4% federal excise tax if sufficient taxable income is not distributed within prescribed time limits. The excise tax equals 4% of the annual amount, if any, by which the sum of (a) 85% of the Company’s ordinary income and (b) 95% of the Company’s net capital gain exceeds cash distributions and certain taxes paid by the Company. No excise tax was incurred in 2004, 2003, or 2002.

The Management Company is subject to Federal and state income taxes. There was no provision required for income taxes in 2004, 2003 and 2002.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing income allocated to Common Shares by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share includes the effect of common share equivalents outstanding during the period.

Stock-Based Compensation Plans

In December 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS 148 (“SFAS 148”), Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure. SFAS 148 amends SFAS 123 (“SFAS 123”), Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to provide alternative methods of transition for an entity that voluntarily adopts the fair value recognition method of recording stock option expense. SFAS 148 also amends the disclosure provisions of SFAS 123 and APB Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, to require disclosure in the summary of significant accounting policies of the effects of an entity’s accounting policy with respect to stock options on reported net income and earnings per share in annual and interim financial statements. The Company adopted SFAS 148 on a prospective basis for all grants subsequent to January 1, 2002.

Prior to 2002, the Company accounted for stock options issued under the recognition and measurement provisions of APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and Related Interpretations. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the fair value based method had been applied to all outstanding and unvested awards in each period (in thousands, except per share amounts):

	Year ended December 31,

	2004			2003			2002

Net income allocated to Common Shares, as reported	$	55,083		$	54,174		$	51,078
Add: Stock based compensation expense included in reported net income		2,114			2,740			2,553
Deduct: Total stock based compensation expense determined under fair value recognition method for all awards		(2,670	)		(3,191	)		(3,231	)

Pro forma net income allocated to Common Shares	$	54,527		$	53,723		$	50,400

Earnings per Common Share
Basic - as reported	$	1.15		$	1.43		$	1.40

Basic - pro forma	$	1.14		$	1.41		$	1.38

Diluted - as reported	$	1.15		$	1.43		$	1.39

Diluted - pro forma	$	1.14		$	1.41		$	1.37

Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income or loss is recorded in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 130 (“SFAS 130”), Reporting Comprehensive Income. SFAS 130 establishes standards for reporting comprehensive income and its components in financial statements. Comprehensive income includes unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities and the effective portions of changes in the fair value of derivatives.

Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

The Company accounts for its derivative instruments and hedging activities under SFAS No. 133 (“SFAS 133”), Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and its corresponding amendments under SFAS No. 138, Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – An Amendment of SFAS 133. SFAS 133 requires the Company to measure every derivative instrument (including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) at fair value and record them in the

F - 13

Back to Contents

balance sheet as either an asset or liability. For derivatives designated as fair value hedges, the changes in fair value of both the derivative instrument and the hedged item are recorded in earnings. For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portions of changes in the fair value of the derivative are reported in other comprehensive income. Changes in fair value of derivative instruments and ineffective portions of hedges are recognized in earnings in the current period. For the three years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, the Company was not party to any derivative contract designated as a fair value hedge.

The Company actively manages its ratio of fixed-to-floating rate debt. To manage its fixed and floating rate debt in a cost-effective manner, the Company, from time to time, enters into interest rate swap agreements as cash flow hedges, under which it agrees to exchange various combinations of fixed and/or variable interest rates based on agreed upon notional amounts. See Note 11.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts been reclassified in prior years to conform to the current year presentation.

New Pronouncements

In January 2003, FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (“FIN 46”), an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) 51. FIN 46 provides guidance on identifying entities for which control is achieved through means other than through voting rights, variable interest entities (“VIE’s”), and how to determine when and which business enterprises should consolidate the VIE. The consolidation provisions of FIN 46 were effective immediately for variable interests in VIE’s created after January 31, 2003. In December 2003, FASB revised Interpretation FIN No. 46 (“FIN 46R”), which adopted several Financial Statement Positions and provided transitional guidance for relationships with VIE’s that are special purpose entities (“SPEs”) versus non-SPE’s. The Company has no SPE’s. The Company implemented the revised guidance to previously existing non-SPE relationships as of March 31, 2004. In connection with the full adoption, the Company concluded that two previously unconsolidated real estate ventures (Four Tower Bridge Associates and Six Tower Bridge Associates) are VIE’s and that the Company is the primary beneficiary. As a consequence, effective March 31, 2004, these investments have been consolidated in the Company’s balance sheet, with the interests of the outside joint venture partners reflected as a minority interest. The results of operations for these investments subsequent to March 31, 2004 have been included in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations with the portion of net income for the investments attributable to outside venture partners reflected as minority interest attributable to continuing operations. There was no cumulative effect gain or loss upon adoption on March 31, 2004.

With respect to the Company’s remaining investments in unconsolidated Real Estate Ventures, the Company has concluded that these investments are not VIE’s or that the Company is not the primary beneficiary based on the terms of the arrangements. Accordingly, the Company will continue to reflect these arrangements using the equity method.

In March 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force reached a final consensus regarding Issue 03-6, Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under SFAS 128, (“EITF 03-6”). The issue addresses a number of questions regarding the computation of earnings per share by companies that have issued securities other than common stock that participate in dividends and earnings of the issuing entity. Such securities are contractually entitled to receive dividends when and if the entity declares dividends on common stock. The issue also provides further guidance on applying the two-class method of calculating earnings per share once it is determined that a security is participating. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each class of common stock and participating security according to dividends declared (or accumulated) and participation rights in undistributed earnings. This consensus is effective for periods ending after March 31, 2004 and should be applied by restating previously reported earnings per share. Upon adoption of EITF 03-6, the Company determined that its Series A Preferred Shares and Series B Preferred Shares are participating securities; however, their classification as participating securities had no impact on the Company’s computation or presentation of basic or diluted earnings per share. See Note 12 for the Company’s computation and presentation of earnings per share.

F - 14

Back to Contents

In October 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 123R (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123R”). SFAS 123R requires companies to categorize share-based payments as either liability or equity awards. For liability awards, companies will remeasure the award at fair value at each balance sheet date until the award is settled. Equity classified awards are measured at the fair value on the and are not remeasured. SFAS 123R will be effective for interim or annual periods beginning after June 15, 2005. Awards issued, modified, or settled after the effective date will be measured and recorded in accordance with SFAS 123R. The Company believes that the implementation of this standard will not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 153, “Accounting for Non-monetary Transactions” (“SFAS 153”). SFAS 153 requires non-monetary exchanges to be accounted for at fair value, recognizing any gain or loss, if the transactions meet a commercial-substance criterion and fair value is determinable. SFAS No. 153 is effective for non-monetary transactions occurring in fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company believes that the implementation of this standard will not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

3. REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS

As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, the carrying value of the Company’s Properties was as follows:

	December 31,

	2004		2003

	(amounts in thousands)
Land	$	452,602	$	342,424
Building and improvements		1,892,153		1,426,925
Tenant improvements		138,379		100,395

	$	2,483,134	$	1,869,744

Acquisitions and Dispositions

The Company’s acquisitions were accounted for by the purchase method. The results of each acquired property are included in the Company’s results of operations from their respective purchase dates.

2004

During 2004, the Company acquired one office property in Marlton, New Jersey, totaling 170,000 square feet, and one land parcel totaling 58.4 acres for aggregate consideration of $22.9 million.

On September 21, 2004, the Operating Partnership completed the acquisition of 100% of the partnership interests in The Rubenstein Company, L.P. (“TRC”). Through the acquisition, the Operating Partnership acquired 14 office properties (the “TRC Properties”) located in Pennsylvania and Delaware that contain approximately 3.5 million net rentable square feet. The results of TRC’s operations have been included in the condensed consolidated financial statements since that date.

The aggregate consideration for the TRC Properties was $630.5 million including $28.5 million of closing costs, debt prepayment penalties and debt premiums that are included in the basis of the assets acquired. The consideration was paid with $539.6 million of cash, $79.3 million of debt assumed, $1.6 million of other liabilities assumed, and 343,006 Class A Units valued at $10.0 million. The value of the debt assumed was based on prevailing market rates at the time of acquisition. The value of the Class A Units was based on the average trading price of the Company’s common shares.

The following table summarizes the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition.

F - 15

Back to Contents

	At September 21, 2004

Real estate investments
Land	$	104,810
Building and improvements		430,174
Tenant improvements		21,103

Total real estate investments acquired		556,087
Rent receivables		5,300
Other assets acquired:
Intangible assets:
In-Place leases		50,597
Relationship values		37,890
Above-market leases		13,612

Total intangible assets acquired		102,099
Other assets		6,291

Total Other assets		108,390

Total assets acquired		669,777
Liabilities assumed:
Mortgage notes payable		79,330
Security deposits and deferred rent		618
Other liabilities:
Below-market leases		39,253
Other liabilities		945

Total other liabilities assumed		40,198

Total liabilities assumed		120,146

Net assets acquired	$	549,631

The net assets acquired above do not include any amounts potentially due to the sellers as contingent consideration as part of the transaction. The Operating Partnership has agreed to issue the sellers up to a maximum of $9.7 million of additional Class A Units if certain of the TRC Properties achieve at least 95% occupancy prior to September 21, 2007. Any contingent amounts ultimately payable would represent additional purchase price and would be reflected within the basis of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed.

At the closing of this transaction, the Operating Partnership agreed not to sell the TRC Properties in a transaction that would trigger taxable income to the contributors (i.e., sellers) for periods ranging from three to 15 years. In the event that the Operating Partnership sells any of the properties in such a transaction within the applicable restricted period, the Operating Partnership will be required to pay significant tax liabilities that would be incurred by the contributors.

The Operating Partnership financed the TRC acquisition using the net proceeds from its September 2004 Common Share offering, after repayment of the Operating Partnership’s $100.0 million unsecured term loan facility, and the net proceeds received from two unsecured term loans.

Pro forma information relating to the acquisition of TRC is presented below as if TRC was acquired and the related financing transactions occurred as of the first day of the periods presented. These pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of the results which actually would have occurred if the acquisition had occurred on the first day of the periods presented, nor does the pro forma financial information purport to represent the results of operations for future periods:

F - 16

Back to Contents

	Years ended December 31,

	2004		2003

	(unaudited)
Pro forma revenue	$	381,906	$	382,121
Pro forma income from continuing operations		45,950		59,757
Earnings per share from continuing operations
Basic -- as reported	$	1.09	$	1.14

Basic -- as pro forma	$	0.90	$	0.58

Diluted - as reported	$	1.09	$	1.14

Diluted - as pro forma	$	0.89	$	0.57

During 2004, the Company sold two office properties containing 141,000 net rentable square feet, two industrial properties containing 184,000 net rentable square feet and three land parcels containing 29.3 acres for an aggregate of $31.4 million, realizing a net gain of $2.1 million. As part of the sale of one property, the Company provided the buyer with $4.4 million in mortgage financing.

Additionally, the Company purchased and sold a land parcel containing 93 acres in two separate transactions with unrelated third parties. The purchase and sale resulted in a net gain of approximately $1.5 million. As part of the sale, the Company provided the buyer with $4.0 million in mortgage financing. Subsequent to the sale and prior to December 31, 2004, the mortgage financing was repaid in full.

During 2004, the Company recognized a $2.5 million deferred gain from the sale of a property in 2002 that did not qualify for gain recognition under the full-accrual method. During 2004, the buyer of the property repaid the seller provided financing and the criteria for gain recognition under the full-accrual method were met. The deferred gain recognized was presented within discontinued operations consistent with the historical operating results from the property.

2003

During 2003, the Company sold eight office properties containing an aggregate of approximately 343,000 net rentable square feet, two industrial properties containing an aggregate of approximately 131,000 net rentable square feet and four parcels of land containing an aggregate of approximately 24.1 acres for an aggregate of $45.6 million. In December 2003, the Company sold two office properties containing an aggregate of approximately 633,000 net rentable square feet for an aggregate of $112.8 million, of which $52.9 million of proceeds were used to repay existing mortgage notes payable secured by the two properties. The Company retained a 20% interest in the venture that purchased the properties. The Company recognized a gain on the partial sale of approximately $18.5 million for the portion sold and deferred the gain on the portion retained. The gain on sale and historical results for these properties have not been reflected as discontinued operations because of the Company’s continuing involvement. The Company also purchased five office properties containing approximately 360,000 net rentable square feet and one parcel of land containing approximately 10.0 acres for an aggregate of $67.8 million.

2002

During 2002, the Company sold 23 office properties containing an aggregate of 1.4 million net rentable square feet, 20 industrial properties containing an aggregate of 0.9 million net rentable square feet and two parcels of land containing an aggregate of 12.8 acres for an aggregate of $190.8 million, realizing a net gain of $8.6 million before minority interest. The Company also purchased seven office properties containing 617,000 net rentable square feet and one parcel of land containing 9.0 acres for an aggregate of $99.1 million.

4. INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED REAL ESTATE VENTURES

As of December 31, 2004, the Company had an aggregate investment of approximately $12.8 million in nine Real Estate Ventures (net of returns of investment). The Company formed these ventures with

F -17

Back to Contents

unaffiliated third parties to develop office properties or to acquire land in anticipation of possible development of office properties. Seven of the Real Estate Ventures own eight office buildings that contain an aggregate of approximately 1.6 million net rentable square feet, one Real Estate Venture developed a hotel property that contains 137 rooms and one Real Estate Venture is developing an office property located in Charlottesville,Virginia.

The Company also has investments in two real estate ventures that are variable interest entities under FIN No. 46R and of which the Company is the primary beneficiary. The financial information for these two real estate ventures (Four Tower Bridge and Six Tower Bridge) were consolidated into the Company’s consolidated financial statements effective March 31, 2004. Prior to March 31, 2004, the Company accounted for its investment in these two ventures under the equity method.

The Company accounts for its non-controlling interests in the Real Estate Ventures using the equity method. Non-controlling ownership interests generally range from 6% to 50%. Ownership percentages represent the Company’s entitlement to residual distributions after payments of priority returns. The Company’s investments, initially recorded at cost, are subsequently adjusted for the Company’s net equity in the ventures’ income or loss and cash contributions and distributions.

The Company’s investment in Real Estate Ventures as of December 31, 2004 and the Company’s share of the Real Estate Ventures’s income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2004 was as follows (in thousands):

	Ownership Percentage (1)			Carrying Amount		Company’s Share of Real Estate Venture Income (Loss)			Real Estate Venture Debt at 100%		Current Interest Rate			Debt Maturity

Two Tower Bridge Associates		35	%	$	2,145	$	231		$	10,401		6.82	%		May-08
Four Tower Bridge Associates (2)		65	%		—		(5	)		—		N/A			N/A
Five Tower Bridge Associates		15	%		232		231			30,331		6.77	%		Feb-09
Six Tower Bridge Associates (2)		63	%		—		(34	)		—		N/A			N/A
Eight Tower Bridge Associates (3)		6	%		1,218		(144	)		39,857		3.52	%		Feb-05
Tower Bridge Inn Associates		50	%		2,138		(41	)		11,035		8.50	%		Apr-07
1000 Chesterbrook Boulevard		50	%		3,270		541			27,516		6.88	%		Nov-11
PJP Building Two, LC		30	%		76		61			5,591		6.12	%		Nov-23
PJP Building Three, LC		25	%		37		—			3,677		3.07	%		Jul-07
PJP Building Five, LC		25	%		105		76			6,716		6.47	%		Aug-19
Macquarie BDN Christina LLC		20	%		3,533		968			74,500		4.62	%		Jan-09
Florig, LP		30	%		—		—			—		N/A			N/A
Invesco Partnership, L.P. (4)		35	%		—		140			—		N/A			N/A

				$	12,754	$	2,024		$	209,624


(1)	Ownership percentage represents the Company’s entitlement to residual distributions after payments of priority returns.
(2)	These real estate ventures were consolidated effective March 31, 2004 under FIN 46R. The amounts reflected above represent the Company’s share of the real estate venture’s loss during the period from January 1, 2004 through March 31, 2004.
(3)	The parties are preparing documents, that, if executed, would extend the maturity date on the debt for this venture to February 2006 and the current interest rate would be changed to LIBOR plus 2.35%.
(4)	The Company’s interest consists solely of a residual profits interest.

The following is a summary of the financial position of the unconsolidated Real Estate Ventures in which the Company had investment interests as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 (in thousands):

	December 31,

	2004		2003

Net property	$	294,378	$	322,196
Other assets		29,944		29,982
Liabilities		26,989		27,900
Debt		209,624		231,401
Equity		87,709		92,877
Company’s share of equity (Company basis)		12,754		15,853

F - 18

Back to Contents

The following is a summary of results of operations of the unconsolidated Real Estate Ventures in which the Company had interests as of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 (in thousands):

	Year ended December 31,

	2004		2003		2002

Revenue	$	46,906	$	29,703	$	27,219
Operating expenses		19,395		11,576		10,406
Interest expense, net		11,843		9,585		9,212
Depreciation and amortization		9,514		8,085		5,531
Net income		6,154		457		2,070
Company’s share of income (Company basis)		2,024		52		987

During 2003, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $0.9 million associated with a non-operating joint venture. The write-off consisted primarily of legal and acquisition costs related to a parcel of land that was not acquired.

As of December 31, 2004, the aggregate principal payments of non-recourse debt payable to third-parties is as follows (in thousands):

2005	$	1,346
2006		41,290
2007		15,401
2008		7,830
2009 and thereafter		143,757

	$	209,624

As of December 31, 2004, the Company had guaranteed repayment of approximately $0.6 million of loans on behalf of certain Real Estate Ventures. The Company also provides customary environmental indemnities in connection with construction and permanent financing both for its own account and on behalf of its Real Estate Ventures.

5. DEFERRED COSTS

As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company’s deferred costs were comprised of the following (in thousands):

	December 31, 2004

	Total Cost		Accumulated Amortization			Deferred Costs, net

Leasing costs	$	46,458	$	(19,768	)	$	26,690
Financing Costs		9,070		(1,311	)		7,759

Total		$55,528	$	(21,079	)	$	34,449

	December 31, 2003

	Total Cost		Accumulated Amortization			Deferred Costs, net

Leasing costs	$	38,781	$	(15,090	)	$	23,691
Financing Costs		7,360		(4,980	)		2,380

Total	$	46,141	$	(20,070	)	$	26,071

During 2004, 2003 and 2002, the Company capitalized internal direct leasing costs of $4.0 million, $3.9 million and $3.6 million, respectively, in accordance with SFAS No. 91 and related guidance.

F - 19

Back to Contents

6. INTANGIBLE ASSETS

As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company’s intangible assets were comprised of the following (in thousands):

	December 31, 2004

	Total Cost		Accumulated Amortization			Deferred Costs, net

In-place lease value	$	55,165	$	(6,117	)	$	49,048
Tenant relationship value		40,570		(2,377	)		38,193
Above market leases acquired		15,685		(1,870	)		13,815

Total	$	111,420	$	(10,364	)	$	101,056

	December 31, 2003

	Total Cost		Accumulated Amortization			Deferred Costs, net

In-place lease value	$	4,097	$	(563	)	$	3,534
Tenant relationship value		2,117		(84	)		2,033
Above market leases acquired		2,211		(345	)		1,866

Total	$	8,425	$	(992	)	$	7,433

7. MORTGAGE NOTES PAYABLE

The following table sets forth information regarding our mortgage indebtedness outstanding at December 31, 2004 and 2003 (in thousands):

	Carrying Value

Property / Location	December 31, 2004		December 31, 2003		Effective Interest Rate (a)			Maturity Date

Grande B	$	80,429	$	81,704		7.48	%		Jul-27
Two Logan Square		78,793		—		5.78	%		Jul-09
Newtown Square/Berwyn Park/Libertyview		65,442		66,000		7.25	%		May-13
Midlantic Drive/Lenox Drive/DCC I		64,942		65,993		8.05	%		Oct-11
Grande A		62,177		63,526		7.48	%		Jul-27
Plymouth Meeting Exec.		47,513		48,299		7.00	%		Dec-10
Arboretum I, II, III & V		23,690		24,109		7.59	%		Jul-11
Grande A (a)		17,157		20,000		5.17	%		Jul-27
Six Tower Bridge		15,394		—		7.79	%		Aug-12
400 Commerce Drive		12,175		12,346		7.12	%		Jun-08
Four Tower Bridge		10,890		—		6.62	%		Feb-11
Croton Road		6,100		6,209		7.81	%		Jan-06
200 Commerce Drive		6,051		6,165		7.12	%		Jan-10
Southpoint III		5,877		6,257		7.75	%		Apr-14
440 & 442 Creamery Way		5,728		5,862		8.55	%		Jul-07
Norriton Office Center		5,270		5,342		8.50	%		Oct-07
429 Creamery Way		3,087		3,235		8.30	%		Sep-06
Grande A (a)		3,040		3,684		5.34	%		Jul-27
481 John Young Way		2,420		2,475		8.40	%		Nov-07
111 Arrandale Blvd		1,100		1,152		8.65	%		Aug-06
Interstate Center (a)		959		1,131		3.94	%		Mar-07
630 Allendale Road		—		19,797		—			—
400 Berwyn Park		—		15,726		—			—
1000 Howard Boulevard		—		3,647		—			—


Total mortgage indebtedness	$	518,234	$	462,659


(a)	For loans that bear interest at a variable rate, the rates in effect at December 31, 2004 have been presented.

During 2004, 2003 and 2002, the Company’s weighted-average interest rate on its mortgage notes payable was 6.80%, 7.09% and 7.27%, respectively. As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, the net carrying value of the Company’s Properties that are encumbered by mortgage indebtedness was $815.8 million and $735.0 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, the carrying value of the Company’s debt was

F - 20

Back to Contents

below fair market value by approximately $48.5 million and $85.7 million, respectively, as determined by using year-end interest rates and market conditions.

As of December 31, 2004, the Company’s aggregate principal payments are as follows (in thousands):

2005	$	8,643
2006		18,928
2007		22,495
2008		21,160
2009		77,790
2010 and thereafter		361,510

Total mortgage payments		510,526
Plus: Unamortized debt premiums		7,708

Total mortgage indebtedness	$	518,234

8. UNSECURED NOTES

The following table sets forth information regarding our unsecured notes outstanding at December 31, 2004:

Year		Face Amount		Unamortized Discount			Net	Maturity	Stated Interest Rate		Effective Interest Rate (1)

2008	$	113,000	$	—		$	113,000	Dec-08	4.34	%	4.34	%
2009		275,000		(344	)		274,656	Nov-09	4.50	%	4.62	%
2014		250,000		(1,221	)		248,779	Nov-14	5.40	%	5.53	%

	$	638,000	$	(1,565	)	$	636,435


(1)	Rates include the effect of amortization related to discounts and costs related to settlement of treasury lock agreements.

In October 2004, in anticipation of the offering of the 2009 and 2014 unsecured notes, the Company entered into treasury lock agreements. The treasury lock agreements were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk and qualified for hedge accounting. The treasury lock agreements were for notional amounts totaling $194.8 million for an expiration of five years at an all-in-rate of 4.8% and for notional amounts totaling $188.0 million for an expiration of 10 years at an all-in-rate of 5.6%. The treasury lock agreements were settled in October 2004 upon the completion of the offering of the 2009 and 2014 unsecured notes at a total cost of approximately $3.2 million. The cost was recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and is being amortized to interest expense over the terms of the respective unsecured notes. During 2004, the Company reclassified approximately $0.1 million to interest expense associated with this arrangement.

As of December 31, 2004, the fair value of the Company’s unsecured notes was $633.7 million.

The indenture relating to the 2009 and 2014 unsecured notes contains various financial restrictions and requirements, including (1) a leverage ratio not to exceed 60%, (2) a secured debt leverage ratio not to exceed 40%, (3) an debt service coverage ratio of greater than 1.5 to 1.0, and (4) an unencumbered asset value of not less than 150% of unsecured debt. In addition, the note purchase agreement relating to the the 2008 unsecured notes contains covenants that are similar to the above covenants.

9. UNSECURED CREDIT FACILITY

F - 21

Back to Contents

additional commitments from our existing lenders or new lenders. As of December 31, 2004, the Company had $152.0 million of borrowings and $10.7 million of letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Facility, leaving $287.3 million of unused availability. The weighted-average interest rate on the Company’s unsecured credit facilities, including the effect of interest rate hedges, was 3.79% in 2004, 4.60% in 2003, and 5.41% in 2002.

The Credit Facility requires the maintenance of certain ratios related to minimum net worth, debt-to-total capitalization and fixed charge coverage and various non-financial covenants.

10. UNSECURED TERM LOANS

During 2004, the Company repaid all amounts outstanding under its $100 million unsecured term loan facility. The $100.0 million unsecured term loan bore interest at LIBOR plus a spread ranging from 1.05% to 1.9% per annum based on the Company’s leverage.

In connection with the TRC acquisition in September 2004, the Company obtained two term loans: a $320 million unsecured term loan due in 2007 (the “2007 Term Loan”) and a $113 million term loan due in 2008 (the “2008 Term Loan”). In October 2004, the Company repaid all amounts outstanding under its 2007 Term Loan with proceeds of the 2009 and 2014 unsecured notes. In December 2004, the Company repaid the 2008 Term Loan with the proceeds of the 2008 unsecured notes, which were issued by the Operating Partnership. The Company and certain subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership have fully and unconditionally guaranteed the payment of the principal of and interest on the 2008 unsecured notes. A former partner in TRC has also provided a guaranty of the 2008 unsecured notes (although this guaranty does not in any way limit or diminish the obligations of the Operating Partnership or obligations arising under the guarantees that we and certain subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership provided). As a result of the repayments of the 2007 and 2008 Term Loans, the Company wrote-off approximately $3.0 million of unamortized deferred financing costs. These write-offs are presented as deferred financing costs within interest expense in the consolidated statement of operations. While outstanding, the 2007 and 2008 Term Loans bore interest at LIBOR plus spreads of 1.1% and 1.35%, respectively.

The weighted-average interest rate for the Company’s unsecured term loans during 2004, 2003, and 2002 was 2.9%, 3.0%, and 3.0% respectively.

11. RISK MANAGEMENT AND USE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Risk Management

In the normal course of its on-going business operations, the Company encounters economic risk. There are three main components of economic risk: interest rate risk, credit risk and market risk. The Company is subject to interest rate risk on its interest-bearing liabilities. Credit risk is the risk of inability or unwillingness of tenants to make contractually required payments. Market risk is the risk of declines in the value of properties due to changes in rental rates, interest rates or other market factors affecting the valuation of properties held by the Company.

Use of Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company’s use of derivative instruments is limited to the utilization of interest rate agreements or other instruments to manage interest rate risk exposures and not for speculative purposes. The principal objective of such arrangements is to minimize the risks and/or costs associated with the Company’s operating and financial structure, as well as to hedge specific transactions. The counterparties to these arrangements are major financial institutions with which the Company and its affiliates may also have other financial relationships. The Company is potentially exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by these counterparties. However, because of the high credit ratings of the counterparties, the Company does not anticipate that any of the counterparties will fail to meet these obligations as they come due. The Company does not hedge credit or property value market risks.

The Company formally assesses, both at inception of the hedge and on an on-going basis, whether each derivative is highly-effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of the hedged item. If management

F - 22

Back to Contents

determines that a derivative is not highly-effective as a hedge or if a derivative ceases to be a highly-effective hedge, the Company will discontinue hedge accounting prospectively.

As of December 31, 2004, the Company was not party to any derivative financial instruments.

Over time, the unrealized gains and losses held in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“AOCI”) will be reclassified to earnings in the same period(s) in which the hedged items are recognized in earnings. The current balance held in AOCI is expected to be reclassified to earnings over the lives of the current hedging instruments, or for realized losses on forecasted debt transactions, over the related term of the debt obligation, as applicable. Over the next 12 months, the Company expects to reclassify $0.5 million of net hedging losses into earnings.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Concentrations of credit risk arise when a number of tenants related to the Company’s investments or rental operations are engaged in similar business activities, or are located in the same geographic region, or have similar economic features that would cause their inability to meet contractual obligations, including those to the Company, to be similarly affected. The Company regularly monitors its tenant base to assess potential concentrations of credit risk. Management believes the current credit risk portfolio is reasonably well diversified and does not contain any unusual concentration of credit risk. No tenant accounted for 10% or more of the Company’s rents during 2004, 2003 and 2002. See Note 19 for geographic segment information.

12. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, income from discontinued operations relates to 57 properties containing approximately 3.0 million net rentable square feet that the Company has sold since January 1, 2002. As of December 31, 2004 the Company had no properties designated as held-for-sale. The following table summarizes information for two properties designated as held-for-sale as of December 31, 2003:

	December 31, 2003

	(in thousands)
Real Estate Investments:
Operating Properties	$	6,143
Accumulated depreciation		(906	)

		5,237
Construction-in-progress		—

		5,237
Accrued rent receivable		65
Deferred costs, net		15
Other assets		—

	$	5,317

Tenant security deposits and deferred rents	$	52

The following table summarizes revenue and expense information for the 57 properties sold since January 1, 2002 (in thousands):

F -23

Back to Contents

	Years Ended December 31,

	2004			2003			2002

Revenue:
Rents	$	415		$	5,418		$	15,291
Tenant reimbursements		397			1,018			2,346
Other		17			34			665

Total revenue		829			6,470			18,302
Expenses:
Property operating expenses		667			2,668			4,817
Real estate taxes		274			1,098			2,420
Depreciation and amortization		224			1,053			2,839
Impairment loss on assets held-for-sale		—			—			665

Total operating expenses		1,165			4,819			10,741
Income from discontinued operations before net gain on sale of interests in real estate and minority interest		(336	)		1,651			7,561
Net gain on sales of interest in real estate		3,136			9,690			8,557
Minority interest		(101	)		(495	)		(777	)

Income from discontinued operations	$	2,699		$	10,846		$	15,341

In 2002, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $665,000 in its consolidated statements of operations related to one of the assets held-for-sale.

Discontinued operations have not been segregated in the consolidated statements of cash flows. Therefore, amounts for certain captions will not agree with respective data in the consolidated statements of operations.

13. MINORITY INTEREST

Minority interest is comprised of Class A Units of limited partnership interest (“Class A Units”) and Series B Preferred Units of limited partnership interest (“Series B Preferred Units”). The Operating Partnership issued these interests to persons that contributed assets to the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership is obligated to redeem, at the request of a holder, each Class A Unit for cash or one Common Share, at the option of the Company. Each Series B Preferred Unit had a stated value of $50.00 and was convertible, at the option of the holder, into Class A Units at a conversion price of $28.00. The Series B Preferred Units bore a preferred distribution of 7.25% per annum. Income allocated to minority interest includes the amount of the Series B Preferred Unit distribution and the pro rata share of net income of the Operating Partnership allocated to the Class A Units. In February 2004, the Company redeemed the Series B Preferred Units for an aggregate price of $93.0 million and recorded a $4.5 million gain in determining income allocated to Common Shares. The Company declared distributions of $0.8 million in 2004 and $7.1 million in 2003 and 2002 to the holders of Series B Preferred Units and $3.3 million in 2004, $3.1 million in 2003 and $3.3 million in 2002 to holders of Class A Units. As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company had the following outstanding Class A Units and Series B Preferred Units held by third party investors:

	As of December 31,

	2004		2003

Class A Units		2,061,459		1,737,203
Series B Preferred Units		—		1,950,000

14. PREFERRED SHARES AND BENEFICIARIES’ EQUITY

In 1998, the Company issued $37.5 million of convertible preferred shares with a 7.25% coupon rate (the Series A Preferred Shares). Each Series A Preferred Share had a stated value of $50.00 and was convertible into Common Shares, at the option of the holder, at a conversion price of $28.00. The Series A Preferred Shares distribution was subject to an increase, if quarterly distributions paid to Common Share holders exceeded $0.51 per share. In November 2004, the holders of the Series A Preferred Shares converted the shares into 1.3 million Common Shares at a price of $24.00.

F-24

Back to Contents

In 1999, the Company issued $105.0 million of convertible preferred shares with an 8.75% coupon rate (the Series B Preferred Shares) for net proceeds of $94.8 million. Each Series B Preferred Share was convertible into one Common Shares and was entitled to quarterly dividends equal to the greater of $0.525 per share or the quarterly dividend on a Common Share. As part of the transaction in which the Company issued Series B Preferred Shares, the Company issued to the holder of the Series B Preferred Shares seven-year warrants exercisable for 500,000 Common Shares at an exercise price of $24.00 per share.

In December 2003, the holder converted 1,093,750 shares of the Series B Preferred Shares into 1,093,750 Common Shares, and the Company redeemed the remaining 3,281,250 Series B Preferred Shares at $27.50 per share for approximately $90.2 million (plus accrued distributions thereon for the period from October 1, 2003 through the redemption date) and purchased 250,000 warrants with an exercise price of $24.00 per share for approximately $1.2 million. During 2004, the remaining warrants were exercised. The Company incurred a charge of $20.6 million associated with the redemption/conversion of the Series B Preferred Shares.

In 2003, the Company issued 2,000,000 7.50% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares (the “Series C Preferred Shares”) for net proceeds of $48.1 million. The Series C Preferred Shares are perpetual. The Company may not redeem Series C Preferred Shares before December 30, 2008 except to preserve its REIT status. On or after December 30, 2008, the Company, at its option, may redeem the Series C Preferred Shares, in whole or in part, by paying $25.00 per share plus accrued but unpaid dividends.

In 2004, the Company issued 2,300,000 7.375% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares (the “Series D Preferred Shares”) for net proceeds of $55.5 million. The Series D Preferred Shares are perpetual. The Company may not redeem Series D Preferred Shares before February 27, 2009 except to preserve its REIT status. On or after February 27, 2009, the Company, at its option, may redeem the Series D Preferred Shares, in whole or in part, by paying $25.00 per share plus accrued but unpaid dividends.

The Company’s Board of Trustees has approved a share repurchase program authorizing the Company to repurchase up to 4,000,000 of its outstanding Common Shares. Through December 31, 2004, the Company had repurchased 3.2 million of its Common Shares at an average price of $17.75 per share. Under the share repurchase program, the Company has the authority to repurchase an additional 762,000 shares. No time limit has been placed on the duration of the share repurchase program. The following table summarizes the share repurchases during the three years ended December 31, 2004:

	Year ended December 31,

	2004		2003		2002

Repurchased amount (shares)		—		—		491,074
Repurchased amount ($, in thousands)	$	—	$	—	$	11,053
Average price per share	$	—	$	—	$	22.51

At December 31, 2004, 295,320 unvested restricted Common Shares were held by employees of the Company. The unvested restricted shares, valued at $7.0 million at issuance, are amortized over their respective vesting periods of three to eight years from dates of the original award. The Company recorded compensation expense of $2.0 million in 2004, $2.6 million in 2003 and $2.5 million in 2002 related to restricted share grants.

As of December 31, 2004, there were no warrants outstanding.

15. EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

The following table details the number of shares and net income used to calculate basic and diluted earnings per share for the three years ended December 31, 2004 (in thousands, except share and per share amounts):

F-25

Back to Contents

	For the years ended December 31,

	2004						2003						2002

	Basic			Diluted			Basic			Diluted			Basic			Diluted

Income from continuing operations	$	57,604		$	57,604		$	75,832		$	75,832		$	47,643		$	47,643
Income from discontinued operations		2,699			2,699			10,846			10,846			15,341			15,341
Income allocated to Preferred Shares		(9,720	)		(9,720	)		(11,906	)		(11,906	)		(11,906	)		(11,906	)
Preferred Share redemption/conversion benefit (charge)		4,500			4,500			(20,598	)		(20,598	)		—			—

		55,083			55,083			54,174			54,174			51,078			51,078
Preferred Share discount amortization		—			—			(1,476	)		(1,476	)		(1,476	)		(1,476	)

Income allocated to common shareholders	$	55,083		$	55,083		$	52,698		$	52,698		$	49,602		$	49,602

Weighted-average shares outstanding		47,781,789			47,781,789			36,937,467			36,937,467			35,513,813			35,513,813
Options, warrants and unvested restricted stock		—			236,915			—			150,402			—			131,997

Total weighted-average shares outstanding		47,781,789			48,018,704			36,937,467			37,087,869			35,513,813			35,645,810

Earnings per Common Share:
Continuing operations	$	1.09		$	1.09		$	1.14		$	1.14		$	0.97		$	0.96
Discontinued operations		0.06			0.06			0.29			0.29			0.43			0.43

Total	$	1.15		$	1.15		$	1.43		$	1.43		$	1.40		$	1.39

Securities totaling 2,061,459 in 2004, 6,558,632 in 2003 and 11,256,776 in 2002 were excluded from the earnings per share computations above as their effect would have been antidilutive. Certain preferred equity and preferred operating partnership units would participate in earnings at certain levels whether or not distributed. These thresholds have not been met in years presented and, therefore, no additional participation has occurred.

16. DISTRIBUTIONS

	Years ended December 31,

	2004			2003			2002

Common Share Distributions:
Ordinary income	$	1.48		$	1.43		$	1.65
Capital gain		0.28			0.33			0.11

Total distributions per share	$	1.76		$	1.76		$	1.76

Percentage classified as ordinary income		84.1	%		81.3	%		93.8	%
Percentage classified as capital gain		15.9	%		18.7	%		6.2	%
Preferred Share Distributions:
Total distributions declared	$	9,720,000		$	11,906,000		$	11,906,000

F-26

Back to Contents

17. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

The following table details the components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of and for the three years ended December 31, 2004 (in thousands):

	Unrealized Gains (Losses on Securities)			Cash Flow Hedges			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss


Balance at January 1, 2002	$	85		$	(4,672	)	$	(4,587	)
Change during year		733			(7,954	)		(7,221	)
Reclassification adjustments for losses reclassified into operations		—			5,406			5,406

Balance at December 31, 2002	$	818		$	(7,220	)		(6,402	)
Change during year		51			(1,118	)		(1,067	)
Reclassification adjustments for losses reclassified into operations		—			5,311			5,311

Balance at December 31, 2003	$	869		$	(3,027	)	$	(2,158	)
Change during year		(696	)		309			(387	)
Settlement of treasury locks		—			(3,238	)		(3,238	)
Reclassification adjustments for losses reclassified into operations		(156	)		2,809			2,653

Balance at December 31, 2004	$	17		$	(3,147	)	$	(3,130	)

18. STOCK BASED COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

The Company maintains a plan that authorizes various equity-based awards including incentive stock options. The terms and conditions of option awards are determined by the Board of Trustees. Incentive stock options may not be granted at exercise prices less than fair value of the stock at the time of grant. Options granted by the Company generally vest over two to five years. All options awarded by the Company to date are non-qualified stock options. As of December 31, 2004, the Company is authorized to issue five million equity-based awards of which 1.2 million shares remained available for future issuance under the plan.

The following table summarizes option activity for the three years ended December 31, 2004:

	Number of Shares Under Option			Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Grant Price Range
						Grant Price Range

						From		To

Balance at January 1, 2002		2,478,799		$	26.56	$	6.21	$	29.04
Granted		100,000			19.50		19.50		19.50
Exercised		(55,000	)		19.50		19.50		19.50
Canceled		(151,172	)		22.22		19.50		29.04

Balance at December 31, 2002		2,372,627			26.70		6.21		29.04
Exercised		—			—		—		—
Canceled		—			—		—		—

Balance at December 31, 2003		2,372,627			26.70		6.21		29.04
Exercised		(337,161	)		25.39		24.00		27.78
Canceled		(27,444	)		28.93		27.78		29.04

Balance at December 31, 2004		2,008,022		$	26.89	$	6.21	$	29.04

F-27

Back to Contents

The following table summarizes stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2004:

Range of Exercise Prices	Number of Options Outstanding		Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Life		Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Number of Options Exercisable		Weighted- Average Exercise Price

$6.21 to $14.31		46,667		(a)	$	12.00		46,667	$	12.00
$19.50		100,000		0.6		19.50		66,660		19.50
$24.00 to $29.04		1,861,355		3.1		27.66		1,861,355		27.66

$6.21 to $29.04		2,008,022		3.0		26.89		1,974,682		27.01

(a)	These options outstanding do not have an expiration date and have been excluded from the weighted-average remaining contractual life presented above.

Based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model, the estimated weighted-average fair value of stock options granted was $2.51 in 2002. Assumptions made in determining estimates of fair value include: risk-free interest rate of 2.7% in 2002, a volatility factor of .280 in 2002, a dividend yield of 8.4% in 2002, and a weighted-average life expectancy of 3 years in 2002.

Effective January 1, 2002, the Company voluntarily adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123, prospectively for all employee awards granted, modified, or settled after January 1, 2002 (see Note 2). Accordingly, the Company recorded compensation expense of $102,000 in 2004 and $104,000 in 2003 and $43,000 in 2002. This compensation expense relates to the Company’s grant of 100,000 stock options during 2002.

The Company sponsors a 401(k) defined contribution plan for its employees. Each employee may contribute up to 100% of annual compensation, subject to specific limitations under the Internal Revenue Code. At its discretion, the Company can make matching contributions equal to a percentage of the employee’s elective contribution and profit sharing contributions. Employees vest in employer contributions over a three-year service period. The Company contributions were $0.9 million in 2004, $0.8 million in 2003 and $0.8 million in 2002.

F-28

Back to Contents

19. SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company currently manages its portfolio within five segments: (1) Pennsylvania—West, (2) Pennsylvania—North, (3) New Jersey, (4) Urban and (5) Virginia. The Pennsylvania—West segment includes properties in Chester, Delaware and Montgomery counties in the Philadelphia suburbs of Pennsylvania. The Pennsylvania—North segment includes properties north of Philadelphia in Berks, Bucks, Cumberland, Dauphin, Lehigh and Montgomery counties. The New Jersey segment includes properties in Bucks County, Pennsylvania and counties in the southern part of New Jersey including Burlington, Camden and Mercer counties. The Urban segment includes properties in the City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and the state of Delaware. The Virginia segment includes properties primarily in Albemarle, Chesterfield and Henrico counties, the City of Richmond and Durham, North Carolina. Corporate is responsible for cash and investment management, development of certain real estate properties during the construction period, and certain other general support functions.

Segment information for the three years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 is as follows (in thousands):

	Pennsylvania -- West		Pennsylvania -- North		New Jersey		Urban		Virginia		Corporate		Total

2004:
Real estate investments, at cost:
Operating properties	$	830,621	$	533,142	$	553,969	$	349,911	$	215,490	$	—	$	2,483,133
Construction-in-progress		13,140		24,591		10,994		3,581		3,789		88,921		145,016
Land held for development		9,820		22,065		14,585		516		7,959		6,572		61,517
Assets held for sale		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total revenue	$	86,433	$	76,794	$	99,321	$	26,319	$	27,099	$	7,626	$	323,592
Property operating expenses and real estate taxes		26,074		33,087		37,860		12,126		11,772		—		120,919

Net operating income	$	60,359	$	43,707	$	61,461	$	14,193	$	15,327	$	7,626	$	202,673

2003:
Real estate investments, at cost:
Operating properties	$	573,300	$	480,469	$	536,264	$	65,223	$	214,488	$	—	$	1,869,744
Construction-in-progress		4,546		20,115		4,081		446		582		17		29,787
Land held for development		11,469		21,764		13,378		515		8,576		8,213		63,915
Assets held for sale, at cost		—		—		3,649		—		1,668		—		5,317
Total revenue	$	93,225	$	72,648	$	91,695	$	11,633	$	27,644	$	4,619	$	301,464
Property operating expenses and real estate taxes		27,101		29,398		33,761		6,699		10,966		—		107,925

Net operating income	$	66,124	$	43,250	$	57,934	$	4,934	$	16,678	$	4,619	$	193,539

2002:
Total revenue	$	91,872	$	69,084	$	86,704	$	9,554	$	26,244	$	3,254	$	286,712

Property operating expenses and real estate taxes		26,525		27,396		30,286		5,690		9,937		—		99,834

Net operating income	$	65,347	$	41,688	$	56,418	$	3,864	$	16,307	$	3,254	$	186,878

Net operating income is defined as total revenue less property operating expenses and real estate taxes. Below is reconciliation of consolidated net operating income to consolidated income from continuing operations:

F-29

Back to Contents

	Year Ended December 31,

	2004		2003		2002

	(amounts in thousands)
Consolidated net operating income	$	202,673	$	193,539	$	186,878
Less:
Interest expense		55,061		57,835		63,522
Depreciation and amortization		79,904		60,332		55,925
Administrative expenses		15,100		14,464		14,804
Minority interest attributable to continuing operations		2,472		9,294		9,375
Plus:
Interest income		2,469		3,629		3,399
Equity in income of real estate ventures		2,024		52		987
Net gains on sales of interests in real estate		2,975		20,537		5

Consolidated income from continuing operations	$	57,604	$	75,832	$	47,643

20. RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS

In 1998, the Board authorized the Company to make loans totaling up to $5.0 million to enable employees of the Company to purchase Common Shares at fair market value. The loans have five-year terms, are full recourse, and are secured by the Common Shares purchased. Interest, payable quarterly, accrues on the loans at the lower of the interest rate borne on borrowings under the Company’s Credit Facility or a rate based on the dividend payments on the Common Shares. As of December 31, 2004, the interest rate was 2.77% per annum. The loans are payable at the earlier of the stated maturity date or 90 days following the employee’s termination. As of December 31, 2004, the outstanding balance of these loans totaled $0.4 million and were secured by an aggregate of 21,385 Common Shares.

In 1998, the Company acquired a portfolio of properties from Donald E. Axinn and affiliates. Upon completion of its acquisition, Mr. Axinn joined the Company’s Board. The 1998 acquisition agreement provides for the acquisition in September 2005 of an approximately 141,724 square foot office building located at 101 Paragon Drive, Montvale, New Jersey for $11.0 million from an entity primarily owned and controlled by Mr. Axinn.

The Company owns 384,615 shares of Cypress Communications Inc. (“Cypress”) Common Stock and holds warrants exercisable for 600,000 additional shares. The warrants have an exercise price of $8.00 per share and expired on December 31, 2004. In addition, the Company held warrants exercisable for 123,077 shares at an exercise price of $3.25, and these warrants expire on August 15, 2005. As of December 31, 2004, the Company’s recorded value for its investment in Cypress was $0.4 million. An officer of the Company holds a position on Cypress’s Board of Directors.

In February 2000, the Company loaned an aggregate of $2.5 million to two executive officers to enable them to purchase Common Shares of the Company. One loan had a four-year term and bore interest at the lower of the Company’s cost of funds or a rate based on the dividend payable on the Common Shares, but not to exceed 10% per annum. This loan was subject to forgiveness over a three-year period, with the amount of forgiveness tied to the Company’s total shareholder return compared to the total shareholder return of peer group companies. This loan was also subject to forgiveness in the event of a change of control of the Company. This loan was reflected as a reduction in beneficiaries equity. In 2001, the Company recorded a $4.1 million charge to restructure the other loan in connection with the executive’s transition to a non-executive, non-managerial status. Principal and interest totaling $1.0 million was forgiven related to these loans in 2003 and $0.9 million in 2002 and 2001. At December 31, 2004, no amounts were outstanding under these loans.

In connection with the sale by the Company of a land parcel in 2003, the Company paid a $42,000 commission to Kevin Nichols, son of Anthony A. Nichols, Sr., Chairman of the Board of the Company at that time, for brokerage services relating to the sale.

F-30

Back to Contents

Robert Larson, a former Trustee of the Company who retired from the Board in September 2004, is a managing director of Lazard Freres & Co. LLC (“Lazard”). The Company paid Lazard a fee of approximately $909,000 for investment banking services related to the Company’s sale of two office properties to a Real Estate Venture in 2003.

21. OPERATING LEASES

The Company leases properties to tenants under operating leases with various expiration dates extending to 2020. Minimum future rentals on non-cancelable leases at December 31, 2004 are as follows (in thousands):

Year	Minimum Rent

2005	$	303,771
2006		270,827
2007		237,752
2008		194,576
2009		153,109
2010 and thereafter		453,052

Total minimum future rentals presented above do not include amounts to be received as tenant reimbursements for operating costs.

22. SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS (UNAUDITED)

The following is a summary of quarterly financial information as of and for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 (in thousands, except per share data):

	1st Quarter		2nd Quarter		3rd Quarter		4th Quarter

2004:
Total revenue	$	73,199	$	76,214	$	78,695	$	95,484
Net income		12,450		18,160		21,166		8,527
Income allocated to Common Shares		14,932		15,483		18,489		6,179
Basic earnings per Common Share	$	0.34	$	0.34	$	0.39	$	0.11
Diluted earnings per Common Share	$	0.34	$	0.34	$	0.39	$	0.11
2003:
Total revenue	$	74,368	$	73,626	$	76,339	$	77,131
Net income		13,917		13,524		17,400		41,837
Income allocated to Common Shares		10,941		10,548		14,424		18,261
Basic earnings per Common Share	$	0.30	$	0.29	$	0.38	$	0.46
Diluted earnings per Common Share	$	0.30	$	0.29	$	0.37	$	0.46

The summation of quarterly earnings per share amounts do not necessarily equal the full year amounts.

23. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Legal Proceedings

The Company is involved from time to time in litigation on various matters, including disputes with tenants and disputes arising out of agreements to purchase or sell properties. Given the nature of the Company’s business activities, these lawsuits are considered routine to the conduct of its business. The result of any particular lawsuit cannot be predicted, because of the very nature of litigation, the litigation process and its adversarial nature, and the jury system.

F-31

Back to Contents

There have been recent reports of lawsuits against owners and managers of multifamily and office properties asserting claims of personal injury and property damage caused by the presence of mold in residential units or office space. The Company has been named as a defendant in two lawsuits in the State of New Jersey that allege personal injury as a result of the presence of mold. In 2005, one lawsuit was dismissed by way of summary judgment with prejudice. Unspecified damages are sought on the remaining lawsuit. The Company has referred this lawsuits to its environmental insurance carrier and, as of the date of this Form 10-K, the insurance carrier is tendering a defense to this claim.

Letters-of-Credit

In connection with certain mortgages, the Company is required to maintain leasing and capital reserve accounts with the mortgage lenders through letters-of-credit which totaled $11.5 million at December 31, 2004. The Company is also required to maintain escrow accounts for taxes, insurance and tenant security deposits that amounted to $17.9 million at December 31, 2004. The related tenant rents are deposited into the loan servicer’s depository accounts, which are used to fund debt service, operating expenses, capital expenditures and the escrow and reserve accounts, as necessary. Any excess cash is included in cash and cash equivalents.

Other Commitments or Contingencies

As of December 31, 2004, the Company owned 445 acres of land for future development.

As part of our TRC acquisition, the Operating Partnership agreed to issue to the sellers up to a maximum of $9.7 million of Class A Units of the Operating Partnership if certain of the acquired properties achieve at least 95% occupancy prior to September 21, 2007.

As part of the TRC acquisition, the Company acquired an interest in Two Logan Square, a 696,477 square foot office building in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, primarily through a second and third mortgage secured by this property pursuant to which the Company receives substantially all cash flows from the property. The Company currently does not expect to take title to Two Logan Square until, at the earliest, September 2019. In the event that the Company takes title to Two Logan Square upon a foreclosure of its mortgages, the Company has agreed to make a payment to an unaffiliated third party with a residual interest as a fee owner of this property. The amount of the payment would be $625,000 if we must pay a state and local transfer upon taking title, or $2,875,000 if no transfer tax is payable upon the transfer.

As part of the TRC acquisition and several of our other acquisitions, the Company has agreed not to sell the acquired properties. In the case of TRC, the Company agreed not to sell the acquired properties for periods ranging from three to 15 years from the acquisition date as follows: 201 Radnor Financial Center, 555 Radnor Financial Center and 300 Delaware Avenue (three years); One Rodney Square and 130/150/170 Radnor Financial Center (10 years); and One Logan Square, Two Logan Square and Radnor Corporate Center (15 years). The Company also owns 14 other properties that aggregate 1.0 million square feet and have agreed not to sell these properties for periods that expire through 2008. These agreements generally provide that we may dispose of the subject Properties only in transactions that qualify as tax-free exchanges under Section 1031 of the Code or in other tax deferred transactions. In the event that the Company sells any of the properties within the applicable restricted period in non-exempt transactions, the Company has agreed to pay significant tax liabilities that would be incurred by the parties who sold the applicable property.

The Company invests in its Properties and regularly incurs capital expenditures in the ordinary course of business to maintain the Properties. The Company believes that such expenditures enhance the competitiveness of the Properties. The Company also enters into construction, utility and service contracts in the ordinary course of business which may extend beyond one year. These contracts include terms that provide for cancellation with insignificant or no cancellation penalties.

F-32

Back to Contents

24. SUBSEQUENT EVENT

In January 2005, the Company received a termination fee in the amount of $4.0 million from a tenant in one of the Company’s properties. Additionally, the Company wrote-off approximately $0.2 million of an accrued rent receivable related to this tenant in January 2005.

F-33

Back to Index

Brandywine Realty Trust

Schedule II

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

(in thousands)

Description	Balance at Beginning of Period		Additions		Deductions		Balance at End of Period

			Charged to expense
			Charged to expense

Allowance for doubtful accounts:
Year ended December 31, 2004	$	4,031	$	467	$	413	$	4,085

Year ended December 31, 2003	$	4,576	$	189	$	734	$	4,031

Year ended December 31, 2002	$	4,532	$	894	$	850	$	4,576

F-34

Back to Index

BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST

Schedule III

Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation - December 31, 2004

(in thousands)

							Initial Cost

	City		State		Encumberances at December 31, 2004 (2)		Land		Building and Improvements		Net Improvements (Retirements) Since Acquisition

One Greentree Centre		Marlton		NJ		—		345		4,440		673
Three Greentree Centre		Marlton		NJ		—		323		6,024		154
Two Greentree Centre		Marlton		NJ		—		264		4,693		158
110 Summit Drive		Exton		PA		—		403		1,647		160
1155 Business Center Drive		Horsham		PA		2,497		1,029		4,124		9
120 West Germantown Pike		Plymouth Meeting		PA		—		685		2,773		869
140 West Germantown Pike		Plymouth Meeting		PA		—		481		1,976		295
18 Campus Boulevard		Newtown Square		PA		3,340		787		3,312		(28	)
2240/50 Butler Pike		Plymouth Meeting		PA		—		1,104		4,627		791
2260 Butler Pike		Plymouth Meeting		PA		—		661		2,727		81
3329 Street Road -Greenwood Square		Bensalem		PA		—		350		1,401		100
3331 Street Road -Greenwood Square		Bensalem		PA		—		1,126		4,511		817
3333 Street Road -Greenwood Square		Bensalem		PA		—		851		3,407		675
456 Creamery Way		Exton		PA		—		635		2,548		(48	)
457 Haddonfield Road		Cherry Hill		NJ		11,063		2,142		9,120		2,224
468 Thomas Jones Way		Exton		PA		—		526		2,112		(54	)
486 Thomas Jones Way		Exton		PA		—		806		3,256		(52	)
500 Enterprise Road		Horsham		PA		—		1,303		5,188		(333	)
500 North Gulph Road		King Of Prussia		PA		—		1,303		5,201		712
650 Dresher Road		Horsham		PA		1,669		636		2,501		313
6575 Snowdrift Road		Allentown		PA		—		601		2,411		459
700 Business Center Drive		Horsham		PA		1,685		550		2,201		733
7248 Tilghman Street		Allentown		PA		—		731		2,969		106
7310 Tilghman Street		Allentown		PA		—		553		2,246		575
800 Business Center Drive		Horsham		PA		2,176		896		3,585		18
8000 Lincoln Drive		Marlton		NJ		—		606		2,887		(170	)
One Progress Avenue		Horsham		PA		—		1,399		5,629		232
One Righter Parkway		Wilmington		DE		10,440		2,545		10,195		278
1 Foster Avenue		Gibbsboro		NJ		—		93		364		35
10 Foster Avenue		Gibbsboro		NJ		—		244		971		174
100 Berwyn Park		Berwyn		PA		7,125		1,180		7,290		215
100 Commerce Drive		Newark		DE		—		1,160		4,633		796
100 Katchel Blvd		Reading		PA		—		1,881		7,423		64
1000 Atrium Way		Mt. Laurel		NJ		—		2,061		8,180		581
1000 Howard Boulevard		Mt. Laurel		NJ		—		2,297		9,288		431
10000 Midlantic Drive		Mt. Laurel		NJ		—		3,206		12,857		1,150
100-300 Gundy Drive		Reading		PA		—		6,495		25,180		6,128
1007 Laurel Oak Road		Voorhees		NJ		—		1,563		6,241		15
111 Presidential Boulevard		Bala Cynwyd		PA		—		5,419		21,612		2,597
1120 Executive Boulevard		Marlton		NJ		—		2,074		8,415		979
1336 Enterprise Drive		West Goshen		PA		—		731		2,946		41
15000 Midlantic Drive		Mt. Laurel		NJ		—		3,061		12,254		128
17 Campus Boulevard		Newtown Square		PA		5,177		1,108		5,155		48
2 Foster Avenue		Gibbsboro		NJ		—		185		730		41
20 East Clementon Road		Gibbsboro		NJ		—		769		3,055		284
200 Berwyn Park		Berwyn		PA		9,744		1,533		9,460		885
2000 Midlantic Drive		Mt. Laurel		NJ		9,491		2,202		8,823		810
220 Commerce Drive		Fort Washington		PA		—		1,086		4,338		508
300 Berwyn Park		Berwyn		PA		13,034		2,206		13,422		261
300 Welsh Road - Building I		Horsham		PA		2,458		894		3,572		615
321 Norristown Road		Lower Gwyned		PA		—		1,290		5,176		1,766
323 Norristown Road		Lower Gwyned		PA		—		1,685		6,751		4,206
4 Foster Avenue		Gibbsboro		NJ		—		183		726		75
4000 Midlantic Drive		Mt. Laurel		NJ		3,088		714		5,085		(1,949	)
5 Foster Avenue		Gibbsboro		NJ		—		9		32		25
5 U.S. Avenue		Gibbsboro		NJ		—		21		81		2
50 East Clementon Road		Gibbsboro		NJ		—		114		964		3
500 Office Center Drive		Fort Washington		PA		—		1,617		6,480		1,101
501 Office Center Drive		Fort Washington		PA		—		1,796		7,192		614
6 East Clementon Road		Gibbsboro		NJ		—		1,345		5,366		398
655 Business Center Drive		Horsham		PA		1,761		544		2,529		567
7 Foster Avenue		Gibbsboro		NJ		—		231		921		134
748 Springdale Drive		Exton		PA		—		236		931		163

	Gross Amount at Which Carried December 31, 2004

	Land		Building and Improvements		Total (a)		Accumulated Depreciation at December 31, 2004 (b)		Year of Construction		Year Acquired		Depreciable Life

One Greentree Centre		345		5,113		5,458		2,823		1982		1986		40
Three Greentree Centre		323		6,178		6,501		4,006		1984		1986		40
Two Greentree Centre		264		4,851		5,115		3,076		1983		1986		40
110 Summit Drive		403		1,807		2,210		476		1985		1996		40
1155 Business Center Drive		1,029		4,133		5,162		1,476		1990		1996		40
120 West Germantown Pike		685		3,642		4,327		1,029		1984		1996		40
140 West Germantown Pike		481		2,271		2,752		708		1984		1996		40
18 Campus Boulevard		787		3,284		4,071		973		1990		1996		40
2240/50 Butler Pike		1,104		5,418		6,522		2,007		1984		1996		40
2260 Butler Pike		661		2,808		3,469		795		1984		1996		40
3329 Street Road -Greenwood Square		350		1,501		1,851		406		1985		1996		40
3331 Street Road -Greenwood Square		1,126		5,328		6,454		1,732		1986		1996		40
3333 Street Road -Greenwood Square		851		4,082		4,933		1,205		1988		1996		40
456 Creamery Way		635		2,500		3,135		697		1987		1996		40
457 Haddonfield Road		2,142		11,344		13,486		4,264		1990		1996		40
468 Thomas Jones Way		526		2,058		2,584		605		1990		1996		40
486 Thomas Jones Way		806		3,204		4,010		939		1990		1996		40
500 Enterprise Road		1,303		4,855		6,158		1,277		1990		1996		40
500 North Gulph Road		1,303		5,913		7,216		1,744		1979		1996		40
650 Dresher Road		636		2,814		3,450		855		1984		1996		40
6575 Snowdrift Road		601		2,870		3,471		1,214		1988		1996		40
700 Business Center Drive		550		2,934		3,484		784		1986		1996		40
7248 Tilghman Street		731		3,075		3,806		967		1987		1996		40
7310 Tilghman Street		553		2,821		3,374		1,033		1985		1996		40
800 Business Center Drive		896		3,603		4,499		982		1986		1996		40
8000 Lincoln Drive		606		2,717		3,323		772		1997		1996		40
One Progress Avenue		1,399		5,861		7,260		1,646		1986		1996		40
One Righter Parkway		2,545		10,473		13,018		2,887		1989		1996		40
1 Foster Avenue		93		399		492		93		1972		1997		40
10 Foster Avenue		244		1,145		1,389		261		1983		1997		40
100 Berwyn Park		1,180		7,505		8,685		1,837		1986		1997		40
100 Commerce Drive		1,160		5,429		6,589		1,380		1989		1997		40
100 Katchel Blvd		1,881		7,487		9,368		1,868		1970		1997		40
1000 Atrium Way		2,061		8,761		10,822		2,187		1989		1997		40
1000 Howard Boulevard		2,297		9,719		12,016		2,728		1988		1997		40
10000 Midlantic Drive		3,206		14,007		17,213		3,721		1990		1997		40
100-300 Gundy Drive		6,495		31,308		37,803		7,942		1970		1997		40
1007 Laurel Oak Road		1,563		6,256		7,819		1,459		1996		1997		40
111 Presidential Boulevard		5,419		24,209		29,628		5,356		1997		1997		40
1120 Executive Boulevard		2,074		9,394		11,468		2,643		1987		1997		40
1336 Enterprise Drive		731		2,987		3,718		782		1989		1997		40
15000 Midlantic Drive		3,061		12,382		15,443		3,108		1991		1997		40
17 Campus Boulevard		1,108		5,203		6,311		867		2001		1997		40
2 Foster Avenue		185		771		956		180		1974		1997		40
20 East Clementon Road		769		3,339		4,108		871		1986		1997		40
200 Berwyn Park		1,533		10,345		11,878		2,576		1987		1997		40
2000 Midlantic Drive		2,202		9,633		11,835		2,608		1989		1997		40
220 Commerce Drive		1,010		4,846		5,856		1,247		1985		1997		40
300 Berwyn Park		2,206		13,683		15,889		3,374		1989		1997		40
300 Welsh Road - Building I		894		4,187		5,081		957		1980		1997		40
321 Norristown Road		1,290		6,942		8,232		1,885		1988		1997		40
323 Norristown Road		1,685		10,957		12,642		2,248		1988		1997		40
4 Foster Avenue		183		801		984		194		1974		1997		40
4000 Midlantic Drive		714		3,136		3,850		793		1998		1997		40
5 Foster Avenue		9		57		66		11		1968		1997		40
5 U.S. Avenue		21		83		104		19		1987		1997		40
50 East Clementon Road		114		967		1,081		225		1986		1997		40
500 Office Center Drive		1,617		7,581		9,198		2,360		1974		1997		40
501 Office Center Drive		1,796		7,806		9,602		2,072		1974		1997		40
6 East Clementon Road		1,345		5,764		7,109		1,374		1980		1997		40
655 Business Center Drive		544		3,096		3,640		993		1997		1997		40
7 Foster Avenue		231		1,055		1,286		286		1983		1997		40
748 Springdale Drive		236		1,094		1,330		358		1986		1997		40

F - 35

Back to Contents

BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST

Schedule III

Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation - December 31, 2004

(in thousands)

							Initial Cost

	City		State		Encumberances at December 31, 2004 (2)		Land		Building and Improvements		Net Improvements (Retirements) Since Acquisition

855 Springdale Drive		Exton		PA		—		838		3,370		79
9000 Midlantic Drive		Mt. Laurel		NJ		5,998		1,472		5,895		112
Five Eves Drive		Marlton		NJ		—		703		2,819		840
Four A Eves Drive		Marlton		NJ		—		539		2,168		215
Four B Eves Drive		Marlton		NJ		—		588		2,369		37
King & Harvard Avenue		Cherry Hill		NJ		—		1,726		1,069		2,132
Main Street - Piazza		Voorhees		NJ		—		696		2,802		199
Main Street - Plaza 1000		Voorhees		NJ		—		2,732		10,942		2,905
Main Street - Promenade		Voorhees		NJ		—		531		2,052		207
One South Union Place		Cherry Hill		NJ		—		771		8,047		478
Two Eves Drive		Marlton		NJ		—		818		3,461		105
100 Gateway Centre Parkway		Richmond		VA		—		391		5,410		1,254
1000 First Avenue		King Of Prussia		PA		4,226		2,772		10,936		274
1009 Lenox Drive		Lawrenceville		NJ		—		4,876		19,284		3,247
1020 First Avenue		King Of Prussia		PA		3,378		2,168		8,576		432
1040 First Avenue		King Of Prussia		PA		4,534		2,860		11,282		858
105 / 140 Terry Drive		Newtown		PA		—		2,299		8,238		2,119
1060 First Avenue		King Of Prussia		PA		4,131		2,712		10,953		2
14 Campus Boulevard		Newtown Square		PA		5,296		2,244		4,217		(5	)
150 Corporate Center Drive		Camp Hill		PA		—		964		3,871		406
160 - 180 West Germantown Pike		East Norriton		PA		5,270		1,603		6,418		679
1957 Westmoreland Street		Richmond		VA		2,701		1,061		4,241		282
200 Corporate Center Drive		Camp Hill		PA		—		1,647		6,606		49
2100-2116 West Laburnam Avenue		Richmond		VA		959		2,482		8,846		1,888
2130-2146 Tomlynn Street		Richmond		VA		1,022		353		1,416		343
2161-2179 Tomlynn Street		Richmond		VA		1,078		423		1,695		111
2201-2245 Tomlynn Street		Richmond		VA		2,672		1,020		4,067		437
2212-2224 Tomlynn Street		Richmond		VA		1,256		502		2,014		80
2221-2245 Dabney Road		Richmond		VA		1,297		530		2,123		27
2240 Dabney Road		Richmond		VA		640		264		1,059		—
2244 Dabney Road		Richmond		VA		1,340		550		2,203		16
2246 Dabney Road		Richmond		VA		1,102		455		1,822		—
2248 Dabney Road		Richmond		VA		1,386		512		2,049		305
2251 Dabney Road		Richmond		VA		1,008		387		1,552		145
2256 Dabney Road		Richmond		VA		879		356		1,427		33
2277 Dabney Road		Richmond		VA		1,229		507		2,034		—
2401 Park Drive		Harrisburg		PA		—		182		728		187
2404 Park Drive		Harrisburg		PA		—		167		668		48
2490 Boulevard of the Generals		King Of Prussia		PA		—		348		1,394		44
2511 Brittons Hill Road		Richmond		VA		2,925		1,202		4,820		24
2812 Emerywood Parkway		Henrico		VA		3,274		1,069		4,281		1,417
300 Arboretum Place		Richmond		VA		14,403		5,450		21,892		1,412
300 Corporate Center Drive		Camp Hill		PA		—		4,823		19,301		144
303 Fellowship Drive		Mt. Laurel		NJ		2,476		1,493		6,055		644
304 Harper Drive		Mt. Laurel		NJ		1,076		657		2,674		228
305 Fellowship Drive		Mt. Laurel		NJ		2,237		1,421		5,768		212
305 Harper Drive		Mt. Laurel		NJ		343		223		913		—
307 Fellowship Drive		Mt. Laurel		NJ		2,437		1,565		6,342		155
308 Harper Drive		Mt. Laurel		NJ		—		1,643		6,663		435
309 Fellowship Drive		Mt. Laurel		NJ		2,599		1,518		6,154		926
33 West State Street		Trenton		NJ		—		6,016		24,091		98
426 Lancaster Avenue		Devon		PA		—		1,689		6,756		33
4364 South Alston Avenue		Durham		NC		2,650		1,622		6,419		768
4805 Lake Brooke Drive		Glen Allen		VA		4,108		1,640		6,567		284
50 East State Street		Trenton		NJ		—		8,926		35,735		534
50 Swedesford Square		East Whiteland Twp.		PA		5,899		3,902		15,254		360
500 Nationwide Drive		Harrisburg		PA		—		173		850		798
52 Swedesford Square		East Whiteland Twp.		PA		6,450		4,241		16,579		518
520 Virginia Drive		Fort Washington		PA		—		845		3,455		379
600 Corporate Circle Drive		Harrisburg		PA		—		363		1,452		81
600 East Main Street		Richmond		VA		15,507		9,808		38,255		3,238
600 Park Avenue		King Of Prussia		PA		—		1,012		4,048		—
610 Freedom Business Center		King Of Prussia		PA		5,201		2,017		8,070		665

	Gross Amount at Which Carried December 31, 2004

	Land		Building and Improvements		Total (a)		Accumulated Depreciation at December 31, 2004 (b)		Year of Construction		Year Acquired		Depreciable Life

855 Springdale Drive		838		3,449		4,287		879		1986		1997		40
9000 Midlantic Drive		1,472		6,007		7,479		1,512		1989		1997		40
Five Eves Drive		703		3,659		4,362		1,105		1986		1997		40
Four A Eves Drive		539		2,383		2,922		611		1987		1997		40
Four B Eves Drive		588		2,406		2,994		649		1987		1997		40
King & Harvard Avenue		1,726		3,201		4,927		1,106		1974		1997		40
Main Street - Piazza		696		3,001		3,697		839		1990		1997		40
Main Street - Plaza 1000		2,732		13,847		16,579		3,691		1988		1997		40
Main Street - Promenade		531		2,259		2,790		683		1988		1997		40
One South Union Place		771		8,525		9,296		3,059		1982		1997		40
Two Eves Drive		818		3,566		4,384		1,043		1987		1997		40
100 Gateway Centre Parkway		391		6,664		7,055		1,089		2001		1998		40
1000 First Avenue		2,772		11,210		13,982		2,259		1980		1998		40
1009 Lenox Drive		4,876		22,531		27,407		5,811		1989		1998		40
1020 First Avenue		2,168		9,008		11,176		1,820		1984		1998		40
1040 First Avenue		2,860		12,140		15,000		2,787		1985		1998		40
105 / 140 Terry Drive		2,299		10,357		12,656		2,852		1982		1998		40
1060 First Avenue		2,712		10,955		13,667		2,200		1987		1998		40
14 Campus Boulevard		2,244		4,212		6,456		1,219		1998		1998		40
150 Corporate Center Drive		964		4,277		5,241		994		1987		1998		40
160 - 180 West Germantown Pike		1,603		7,097		8,700		1,780		1982		1998		40
1957 Westmoreland Street		1,061		4,523		5,584		1,046		1975		1998		40
200 Corporate Center Drive		1,647		6,655		8,302		1,452		1989		1998		40
2100-2116 West Laburnam Avenue		2,482		10,734		13,216		2,219		1976		1998		40
2130-2146 Tomlynn Street		353		1,759		2,112		364		1988		1998		40
2161-2179 Tomlynn Street		423		1,806		2,229		355		1985		1998		40
2201-2245 Tomlynn Street		1,020		4,504		5,524		1,020		1989		1998		40
2212-2224 Tomlynn Street		502		2,094		2,596		429		1985		1998		40
2221-2245 Dabney Road		530		2,150		2,680		440		1994		1998		40
2240 Dabney Road		264		1,059		1,323		213		1984		1998		40
2244 Dabney Road		550		2,219		2,769		446		1993		1998		40
2246 Dabney Road		455		1,822		2,277		366		1987		1998		40
2248 Dabney Road		512		2,354		2,866		544		1989		1998		40
2251 Dabney Road		387		1,697		2,084		378		1983		1998		40
2256 Dabney Road		356		1,460		1,816		310		1982		1998		40
2277 Dabney Road		507		2,034		2,541		409		1986		1998		40
2401 Park Drive		182		915		1,097		186		1984		1998		40
2404 Park Drive		167		716		883		151		1983		1998		40
2490 Boulevard of the Generals		348		1,438		1,786		341		1975		1998		40
2511 Brittons Hill Road		1,202		4,844		6,046		972		1987		1998		40
2812 Emerywood Parkway		1,069		5,698		6,767		1,162		1980		1998		40
300 Arboretum Place		5,450		23,304		28,754		4,980		1988		1998		40
300 Corporate Center Drive		4,823		19,445		24,268		4,232		1989		1998		40
303 Fellowship Drive		1,493		6,699		8,192		1,522		1979		1998		40
304 Harper Drive		657		2,902		3,559		648		1975		1998		40
305 Fellowship Drive		1,421		5,980		7,401		1,325		1980		1998		40
305 Harper Drive		223		913		1,136		183		1979		1998		40
307 Fellowship Drive		1,565		6,497		8,062		1,341		1981		1998		40
308 Harper Drive		1,643		7,098		8,741		1,515		1976		1998		40
309 Fellowship Drive		1,518		7,080		8,598		1,684		1982		1998		40
33 West State Street		6,016		24,189		30,205		5,411		1988		1998		40
426 Lancaster Avenue		1,689		6,789		8,478		1,564		1990		1998		40
4364 South Alston Avenue		1,581		7,187		8,768		1,510		1985		1998		40
4805 Lake Brooke Drive		1,640		6,851		8,491		1,383		1996		1998		40
50 East State Street		8,926		36,269		45,195		8,121		1989		1998		40
50 Swedesford Square		3,902		15,614		19,516		3,138		1986		1998		40
500 Nationwide Drive		173		1,648		1,821		456		1977		1998		40
52 Swedesford Square		4,241		17,097		21,338		3,423		1988		1998		40
520 Virginia Drive		845		3,834		4,679		1,132		1987		1998		40
600 Corporate Circle Drive		363		1,533		1,896		340		1978		1998		40
600 East Main Street		9,808		41,493		51,301		8,643		1986		1998		40
600 Park Avenue		1,012		4,048		5,060		905		1964		1998		40
610 Freedom Business Center		2,017		8,735		10,752		2,277		1985		1998		40

F - 36

Back to Contents

BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST

Schedule III

Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation - December 31, 2004

(in thousands)

							Initial Cost

	City		State		Encumberances at December 31, 2004 (2)		Land		Building and Improvements		Net Improvements (Retirements) Since Acquisition

620 Allendale Road		King Of Prussia		PA		—		1,020		3,839		991
620 Freedom Business Center		King Of Prussia		PA		7,002		2,770		11,014		689
630 Clark Avenue		King Of Prussia		PA		—		547		2,190		—
630 Freedom Business Center		King Of Prussia		PA		6,904		2,773		11,144		354
640 Freedom Business Center		King Of Prussia		PA		10,933		4,222		16,891		1,486
650 Park Avenue		King Of Prussia		PA		—		1,916		4,378		902
660 Allendale Road		King of Prussia		PA		—		396		3,343		(1,636	)
680 Allendale Road		King Of Prussia		PA		—		689		2,756		677
6990 Snowdrift Road		Allentown		PA		—		—		1,962		—
700 East Gate Drive		Mt. Laurel		NJ		5,676		3,569		14,436		772
701 East Gate Drive		Mt. Laurel		NJ		2,834		1,736		6,877		763
7010 Snowdrift Road		Allentown		PA		1,272		818		3,324		67
7150 Windsor Drive		Allentown		PA		1,644		1,035		4,219		184
7350 Tilghman Street		Allentown		PA		—		3,414		13,716		1,083
741 First Avenue		King Of Prussia		PA		—		1,287		5,151		209
7450 Tilghman Street		Allentown		PA		4,818		2,867		11,631		1,441
751-761 Fifth Avenue		King Of Prussia		PA		—		1,097		4,391		—
7535 Windsor Drive		Allentown		PA		6,246		3,376		13,400		3,888
755 Business Center Drive		Horsham		PA		2,100		1,362		2,334		645
800 Corporate Circle Drive		Harrisburg		PA		—		414		1,653		103
815 East Gate Drive		Mt. Laurel		NJ		973		636		2,584		—
817 East Gate Drive		Mt. Laurel		NJ		964		611		2,426		153
875 First Avenue		King Of Prussia		PA		—		618		2,473		3,257
9011 Arboretum Parkway		Richmond		VA		4,795		1,857		7,702		352
9100 Arboretum Parkway		Richmond		VA		3,651		1,362		5,489		437
920 Harvest Drive		Blue Bell		PA		—		2,433		9,738		596
9200 Arboretum Parkway		Richmond		VA		2,609		985		3,973		251
9210 Arboretum Parkway		Richmond		VA		3,027		1,110		4,474		458
9211 Arboretum Parkway		Richmond		VA		1,512		582		2,433		111
925 Harvest Drive		Blue Bell		PA		—		1,671		6,606		234
993 Lenox Drive		Lawrenceville		NJ		12,058		2,811		17,996		(5,771	)
997 Lenox Drive		Lawrenceville		NJ		9,839		2,410		9,700		159
Dabney III		Richmond		VA		806		281		1,125		260
Philadelphia Marine Center		Philadelphia		PA		—		532		2,196		519
1050 Westlakes Drive		Berwyn		PA		—		2,611		10,445		4,369
11 Campus Boulevard		Newtown Square		PA		4,741		1,112		4,067		600
400 Berwyn Park		Berwyn		PA		—		2,657		4,462		12,747
630 Dresher Road		Horsham		PA		—		771		3,083		1,539
7130 Ambassador Drive		Allentown		PA		—		761		3,046		9
100 Brandywine Boulevard		Newtown		PA		—		1,784		9,811		2,986
1400 Howard Boulevard		Mt. Laurel		NJ		—		443		—		—
15 Campus Boulevard		Newtown Square		PA		5,923		1,164		3,896		2,160
1700 Paoli Pike		Malvern		PA		—		458		559		3,466
2000 Lenox Drive		Lawrenceville		NJ		14,027		2,291		12,221		2,979
300 Welsh Road - Building II		Horsham		PA		1,013		396		1,585		114
401 Plymouth Road		Plymouth Meeting		PA		—		6,198		16,131		18,185
630 Allendale Road		King of Prussia		PA		—		2,836		4,028		15,954
640 Allendale Road		King of Prussia		PA		—		439		432		1,481
10 Lake Center Drive		Marlton		NJ		—		1,880		7,521		349
100 Arrandale Boulevard		Exton		PA		—		970		3,878		—
100 Lindenwood Drive		Malvern		PA		—		473		1,892		537
101 Lindenwood Drive		Malvern		PA		—		4,152		16,606		655
1100 Cassett Road		Berwyn		PA		—		1,695		6,779		—
111 Arrandale Road		Exton		PA		1,100		262		1,048		—
111/113 Pencader Drive		Newark		DE		—		1,092		4,366		—
1160 Swedesford Road		Berwyn		PA		—		1,781		7,124		436
1180 Swedesford Road		Berwyn		PA		—		2,086		8,342		475
161 Gaither Drive		Mount Laurel		NJ		—		1,016		4,064		340
200 Lake Drive East		Cherry Hill		NJ		—		2,069		8,275		183
200 Lindenwood Drive		Malvern		PA		—		324		1,295		72
210 Lake Drive East		Cherry Hill		NJ		—		1,645		6,579		570
220 Lake Drive East		Cherry Hill		NJ		—		2,144		8,798		511
30 Lake Center Drive		Marlton		NJ		—		1,043		4,171		143

	Gross Amount at Which Carried December 31, 2004

	Land		Building and Improvements		Total (a)		Accumulated Depreciation at December 31, 2004 (b)		Year of Construction		Year Acquired		Depreciable Life

620 Allendale Road		1,020		4,830		5,850		1,277		1961		1998		40
620 Freedom Business Center		2,770		11,703		14,473		2,677		1986		1998		40
630 Clark Avenue		547		2,190		2,737		490		1960		1998		40
630 Freedom Business Center		2,773		11,498		14,271		2,797		1989		1998		40
640 Freedom Business Center		4,222		18,377		22,599		4,416		1991		1998		40
650 Park Avenue		1,916		5,280		7,196		1,173		1968		1998		40
660 Allendale Road		396		1,707		2,103		630		1962		1998		40
680 Allendale Road		689		3,433		4,122		905		1962		1998		40
6990 Snowdrift Road		—		1,962		1,962		198		2003		1998		40
700 East Gate Drive		3,569		15,208		18,777		3,346		1984		1998		40
701 East Gate Drive		1,736		7,640		9,376		1,590		1986		1998		40
7010 Snowdrift Road		818		3,391		4,209		673		1991		1998		40
7150 Windsor Drive		1,035		4,403		5,438		895		1988		1998		40
7350 Tilghman Street		3,414		14,799		18,213		3,493		1987		1998		40
741 First Avenue		1,287		5,360		6,647		1,216		1966		1998		40
7450 Tilghman Street		2,867		13,072		15,939		3,239		1986		1998		40
751-761 Fifth Avenue		1,097		4,391		5,488		982		1967		1998		40
7535 Windsor Drive		3,376		17,288		20,664		3,080		1988		1998		40
755 Business Center Drive		1,362		2,979		4,341		1,096		1998		1998		40
800 Corporate Circle Drive		414		1,756		2,170		415		1979		1998		40
815 East Gate Drive		636		2,584		3,220		519		1986		1998		40
817 East Gate Drive		611		2,579		3,190		502		1986		1998		40
875 First Avenue		618		5,730		6,348		1,032		1966		1998		40
9011 Arboretum Parkway		1,857		8,054		9,911		1,697		1991		1998		40
9100 Arboretum Parkway		1,362		5,926		7,288		1,323		1988		1998		40
920 Harvest Drive		2,433		10,334		12,767		2,489		1990		1998		40
9200 Arboretum Parkway		985		4,224		5,209		924		1988		1998		40
9210 Arboretum Parkway		1,110		4,932		6,042		998		1988		1998		40
9211 Arboretum Parkway		582		2,544		3,126		515		1991		1998		40
925 Harvest Drive		1,671		6,840		8,511		1,513		1990		1998		40
993 Lenox Drive		2,811		12,225		15,036		2,760		1985		1998		40
997 Lenox Drive		2,410		9,859		12,269		2,264		1987		1998		40
Dabney III		281		1,385		1,666		315		1986		1998		40
Philadelphia Marine Center		532		2,715		3,247		557		Various		1998		40
1050 Westlakes Drive		—		14,814		14,814		2,260		1984		1999		40
11 Campus Boulevard		1,112		4,667		5,779		858		1998		1999		40
400 Berwyn Park		2,657		17,209		19,866		1,618		1999		1999		40
630 Dresher Road		771		4,622		5,393		726		1987		1999		40
7130 Ambassador Drive		761		3,055		3,816		522		1991		1999		40
100 Brandywine Boulevard		1,784		12,797		14,581		1,211		2002		2000		40
1400 Howard Boulevard		456		—		456		—		N/A		2000		40
15 Campus Boulevard		1,164		6,056		7,220		842		2002		2000		40
1700 Paoli Pike		458		4,025		4,483		460		2000		2000		40
2000 Lenox Drive		2,291		15,200		17,491		3,234		2000		2000		40
300 Welsh Road - Building II		396		1,699		2,095		423		1980		2000		40
401 Plymouth Road		6,198		34,316		40,514		4,525		2001		2000		40
630 Allendale Road		2,836		19,982		22,818		3,482		2000		2000		40
640 Allendale Road		439		1,913		2,352		150		2000		2000		40
10 Lake Center Drive		1,880		7,870		9,750		827		1989		2001		40
100 Arrandale Boulevard		970		3,878		4,848		364		1997		2001		40
100 Lindenwood Drive		473		2,429		2,902		325		1985		2001		40
101 Lindenwood Drive		4,152		17,261		21,413		1,686		1988		2001		40
1100 Cassett Road		1,695		6,779		8,474		635		1997		2001		40
111 Arrandale Road		262		1,048		1,310		98		1996		2001		40
111/113 Pencader Drive		1,092		4,366		5,458		409		1990		2001		40
1160 Swedesford Road		1,781		7,560		9,341		890		1986		2001		40
1180 Swedesford Road		2,086		8,817		10,903		926		1987		2001		40
161 Gaither Drive		1,016		4,404		5,420		508		1987		2001		40
200 Lake Drive East		2,069		8,458		10,527		829		1989		2001		40
200 Lindenwood Drive		324		1,367		1,691		127		1984		2001		40
210 Lake Drive East		1,645		7,149		8,794		771		1986		2001		40
220 Lake Drive East		2,144		9,309		11,453		1,106		1988		2001		40
30 Lake Center Drive		1,043		4,314		5,357		431		1986		2001		40

F - 37

Back to Contents

BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST

Schedule III

Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation - December 31, 2004

(in thousands)

								Initial Cost

		City		State		Encumberances at December 31, 2004 (2)		Land		Building and Improvements		Net Improvements (Retirements) Since Acquisition

	300 Lindenwood Drive		Malvern		PA		—		848		3,394		254
	301 Lindenwood Drive		Malvern		PA		—		2,729		10,915		946
	412 Creamery Way		Exton		PA		—		1,195		4,779		435
	429 Creamery Way		Exton		PA		3,087		1,368		5,471		—
	436 Creamery Way		Exton		PA		—		994		3,978		12
	440 Creamery Way		Exton		PA		3,069		982		3,927		252
	442 Creamery Way		Exton		PA		2,659		894		3,576		—
	457 Creamery Way		Exton		PA		—		777		3,107		—
	467 Creamery Way		Exton		PA		—		906		3,623		17
	479 Thomas Jones Way		Exton		PA		—		1,075		4,299		354
	481 John Young Way		Exton		PA		2,420		496		1,983		2
	555 Croton Road		King of Prussia		PA		6,100		4,486		17,943		115
	7360 Windsor Drive		Allentown		PA		—		1,451		3,618		2,037
	Two Righter Parkway		Wilmington		DE		—		2,802		11,217		—
	1000 Lenox Drive		Lawrenceville		NJ		—		1,174		4,696		—
	200 Commerce Drive		Newark		DE		6,051		911		4,414		—
	400 Commerce Drive		Newark		DE		12,175		2,528		9,220		4,490
	600 West Germantown Pike		Plymouth Meeting		PA		12,137		3,652		15,288		355
	610 West Germantown Pike		Plymouth Meeting		PA		11,751		3,651		14,514		516
	620 West Germantown Pike		Plymouth Meeting		PA		11,894		3,572		14,435		902
	630 West Germantown Pike		Plymouth Meeting		PA		11,732		3,558		14,743		350
	6802 Paragon Place		Richmond		VA		—		2,917		11,454		1,082
	980 Harvest Drive		Blue Bell		PA		—		2,079		7,821		408
	565 East Swedesford Road		Wayne		PA		—		1,872		7,489		9
	575 East Swedesford Road		Wayne		PA		—		2,178		8,712		—
	585 East Swedesford Road		Wayne		PA		—		1,350		5,401		—
	595 East Swedesford Road		Wayne		PA		—		2,729		10,917		—
	989 Lenox Drive		Lawrenceville		NJ		—		3,701		14,802		76
	100 North 18th Street		Philadelphia		PA		78,793		16,066		100,255		40
	130 North 18th Street		Philadelphia		PA		—		14,496		107,736		34
	130 Radnor Chester Road		Radnor		PA		—		2,573		8,338		—
	150 Radnor Chester Road		Radnor		PA		—		11,925		36,986		173
	170 Radnor Chester Road		Radnor		PA		—		2,514		8,147		—
	201 King of Prussia Road		Radnor		PA		—		8,956		29,811		67
	300 Delaware Avenue		Wilmington		DE		—		6,368		13,739		—
	525 Lincoln Drive West		Marlton		NJ		—		3,727		17,620		6
	555 Lancaster Avenue		Radnor		PA		—		8,014		16,508		—
	920 North King Street		Wilmington		DE		—		6,141		21,140		—
	Five Radnor Corporate Center		Radnor		PA		—		6,506		25,525		—
	Four Radnor Corporate Center		Radnor		PA		—		5,406		21,390		62
(1)	Four Tower Bridge		Conshohocken		PA		10,890		2,672		14,221		(226	)
	One Radnor Corporate Center		Radnor		PA		—		7,323		28,613		—
	Three Radnor Corporate Center		Radnor		PA		—		4,773		17,961		—
	Two Radnor Corporate Center		Radnor		PA		—		3,937		15,484		—
(1)	Six Tower Bridge		Conshohocken		PA		15,394		2,827		15,525		235
	922 Swedesford Road		Berwyn		PA		—		218		—		—

						$	512,357	$	455,318	$	1,865,474	$	165,058

		Gross Amount at Which Carried December 31, 2004

		Land		Building and Improvements		Total (a)		Accumulated Depreciation at December 31, 2004 (b)		Year of Construction		Year Acquired		Depreciable Life

	300 Lindenwood Drive		848		3,648		4,496		436		1991		2001		40
	301 Lindenwood Drive		2,729		11,861		14,590		1,270		1984		2001		40
	412 Creamery Way		1,195		5,214		6,409		618		1999		2001		40
	429 Creamery Way		1,368		5,471		6,839		513		1996		2001		40
	436 Creamery Way		994		3,990		4,984		381		1991		2001		40
	440 Creamery Way		982		4,179		5,161		412		1991		2001		40
	442 Creamery Way		894		3,576		4,470		335		1991		2001		40
	457 Creamery Way		777		3,107		3,884		291		1990		2001		40
	467 Creamery Way		906		3,640		4,546		341		1988		2001		40
	479 Thomas Jones Way		1,075		4,653		5,728		518		1988		2001		40
	481 John Young Way		496		1,985		2,481		186		1997		2001		40
	555 Croton Road		4,486		18,058		22,544		1,719		1999		2001		40
	7360 Windsor Drive		1,451		5,655		7,106		1,002		2001		2001		40
	Two Righter Parkway		2,802		11,217		14,019		1,277		1987		2001		40
	1000 Lenox Drive		1,174		4,696		5,870		294		1982		2002		40
	200 Commerce Drive		911		4,414		5,325		464		1998		2002		40
	400 Commerce Drive		2,528		13,710		16,238		3,495		1997		2002		40
	600 West Germantown Pike		3,652		15,643		19,295		1,171		1986		2002		40
	610 West Germantown Pike		3,651		15,030		18,681		1,252		1987		2002		40
	620 West Germantown Pike		3,572		15,337		18,909		1,213		1990		2002		40
	630 West Germantown Pike		3,558		15,093		18,651		1,138		1988		2002		40
	6802 Paragon Place		2,917		12,536		15,453		1,022		1989		2002		40
	980 Harvest Drive		2,079		8,229		10,308		524		1988		2002		40
	565 East Swedesford Road		1,872		7,498		9,370		220		1984		2003		40
	575 East Swedesford Road		2,178		8,712		10,890		254		1985		2003		40
	585 East Swedesford Road		1,350		5,401		6,751		158		1998		2003		40
	595 East Swedesford Road		2,729		10,917		13,646		318		1998		2003		40
	989 Lenox Drive		3,700		14,878		18,578		373		1984		2003		40
	100 North 18th Street		16,066		100,295		116,361		1,194		1988		2004		33
	130 North 18th Street		14,496		107,770		122,266		1,208		1998		2004		23
	130 Radnor Chester Road		2,573		8,338		10,911		98		1983		2004		25
	150 Radnor Chester Road		11,925		37,159		49,084		421		1983		2004		29
	170 Radnor Chester Road		2,514		8,147		10,661		95		1983		2004		25
	201 King of Prussia Road		8,956		29,878		38,834		360		2001		2004		25
	300 Delaware Avenue		6,368		13,739		20,107		262		1989		2004		23
	525 Lincoln Drive West		3,727		17,626		21,353		368		1986		2004		40
	555 Lancaster Avenue		8,014		16,508		24,522		221		1973		2004		24
	920 North King Street		6,141		21,140		27,281		272		1989		2004		30
	Five Radnor Corporate Center		6,506		25,525		32,031		287		1998		2004		38
	Four Radnor Corporate Center		5,406		21,452		26,858		231		1995		2004		30
(1)	Four Tower Bridge		2,672		13,995		16,667		4,122		1998		2004		40
	One Radnor Corporate Center		7,323		28,613		35,936		412		1998		2004		29
	Three Radnor Corporate Center		4,773		17,961		22,734		245		1998		2004		29
	Two Radnor Corporate Center		3,937		15,484		19,421		189		1998		2004		29
(1)	Six Tower Bridge		2,827		15,760		18,587		3,618		1999		2004		40
	922 Swedesford Road		218		—		218		—		N/A		N/A		40

		$	452,602	$	2,030,532	$	2,483,134	$	325,802

F - 38

Back to Contents

(a)	Reconciliation of Real Estate:

	The following table reconciles the real estate investments from January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2004 (in thousands):

	2004			2003			2002

Balance at beginning of year	$	1,869,744		$	1,890,009		$	1,893,039
Additions:
Acquisitions		578,197			59,149			120,627
Consolidation of VIE’s (1)		35,245			—			—
Capital expenditures		30,953			57,721			94,086
Less:
Dispositions		(31,005	)		(135,118	)		(209,014	)
Assets transferred to held-for-sale		—			(2,017	)		(8,729	)

Balance at end of year	$	2,483,134		$	1,869,744		$	1,890,009

(b)	Reconciliation of Accumulated Depreciation:

	The following table reconciles the accumulated depreciation on real estate investments from January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2004 (in thousands):

	2004			2003			2002

Balance at beginning of year	$	268,091		$	245,230		$	230,793
Additions:
Depreciation expense - continued operations		60,179			51,191			46,190
Depreciation expense - discontinued operations		224			695			2,511
Consolidation of VIE’s (1)		7,741			—			—
Acquisitions		—			—			1,175
Less:
Dispositions		(10,433	)		(28,663	)		(34,204	)
Assets transferred to held-for-sale		—			(362	)		(1,235	)

Balance at end of year	$	325,802		$	268,091		$	245,230

	(1) -	Joint ventures which were consolidated at March 31, 2004 under Financial Interpretation 46-R (“FIN-46-R”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.”

	(2) -	Schedule III excludes an asset owned that is subject to a deferred financing lease.

F - 39

405283_ex10_65

Summary of Board of Trustee Compensation (as of March 1, 2004)

1. Annual Fee:

a. $35,000.

b. payable at annual meeting of shareholders.

c. payable in cash or common shares (valued at closing price on date of annual meeting of shareholders), at the election of each Trustee.

d. cash portion is eligible for deferral into the Deferred Compensation Plan.

2. Annual Equity Award:

a. $25,000 in “restricted” common shares.

b. number of shares computed based on closing price on date of annual meeting of shareholders.

c. shares vest in three equal annual installments, commencing on the first anniversary of the award date.

d. unvested shares vote and are entitled to dividends.

e. restricted common shares are not eligible for deferral into the Deferred Compensation Plan.

3. Per Board Meeting Fee:

a. $1,500.

b. payable in cash.

c. eligible for deferral into the Deferred Compensation Plan.

4. Per Committee Meeting Fee:

a. $1,000.

b. payable in cash.

c. not eligible for deferral into the Deferred Compensation Plan.

B-1

5. Per informal Board Informational Meeting Fee:

a. $1,500.

b. payable in cash.

c. not eligible for deferral into the Deferred Compensation Plan.

6. Chair Fees:

a. Board Chair - $10,000 per year, payable in cash, at annual meeting of shareholders.

b. Audit Committee Chair - $7,500 per year, payable in cash, at annual meeting of shareholders.

c. Compensation Committee Chair - $6,000 per year, payable in cash, at annual meeting of shareholders.

d. Corporate Governance Committee Chair - $5,000 per year, payable in cash, at annual meeting of shareholders.

e. Chair fees are not eligible for deferral into the Deferred Compensation Plan.

B-2

Prepared and filed by St Ives Burrups

EXHIBIT 12.1

Brandywine Realty Trust

Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Share Distributions (in thousands)

				For the years ended December 31,

	2004			2003			2002			2001			2000

Earnings before fixed charges:
Add:
Income from continuing operations (a)	$	57,604		$	75,832		$	47,643		$	19,462		$	38,953
Minority interest attributable to continuing operations		2,472			9,294			9,375			7,760			8,800
Fixed charges - per below		61,894			69,476			76,950			83,627			84,604
Less:
Income from equity method investments not distributed		-			-			-			-			(518	)
Capitalized interest		(3,030	)		(1,503	)		(2,949	)		(5,178	)		(8,182	)
Preferred Distributions of consolidated subsidiaries		(832	)		(7,069	)		(7,069	)		(7,069	)		(7,069	)

Earnings before fixed charges	$	118,108		$	146,030		$	123,950		$	98,602		$	116,588


Fixed charges and Preferred Distributions:
Interest expense (including amortization)	$	55,061		$	57,835		$	63,522		$	67,496		$	64,746
Capitalized interest		3,030			1,503			2,949			5,178			8,182
Proportionate share of interest for unconsolidated real estate ventures		2,971			3,069			3,410			3,884			4,607
Distributions to preferred unitholders in Operating Partnership		832			7,069			7,069			7,069			7,069

Total Fixed Charges		61,894			69,476			76,950			83,627			84,604

Income allocated to preferred shareholders		9,720			11,906			11,906			11,906			11,906

Total Preferred Distributions		9,720			11,906			11,906			11,906			11,906
Total combined fixed charges and preferred distributions	$	71,614		$	81,382		$	88,856		$	95,533		$	96,510


Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred distributions		1.65			1.79			1.39			1.03			1.21

(a)

Amounts for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001 and 2000 have been reclassified to present properties identified as held for sale consistent with the presentation for the period ended December 31, 2004. As a result, operations have been reclassified to discontinued operations from continuing operations for all periods presented.

Prepared and filed by St Ives Burrups

Exhibit 21.1

List of Subsidiaries

AAPOP 1, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership

AAPOP 2, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership

Brandywine Ambassador, L.P., a Pennsylvania limited partnership

Brandywine Byberry LP, a Delaware limited partnership

Brandywine Central, L.P., a Pennsylvania limited partnership

Brandywine Cira, L.P., a Pennsylvania limited partnership

Brandywine Croton, L.P., a Pennsylvania limited partnership

Brandywine Dominion, L.P., a Pennsylvania limited partnership

Brandywine F.C., L.P., a Pennsylvania limited partnership

Brandywine Grande B, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership

Brandywine Grande C, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership

Brandywine Industrial Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership

Brandywine I.S., L.P., a Pennsylvania limited partnership

Brandywine Metroplex, L.P., a Pennsylvania limited partnership

Brandywine Midatlantic, LP, a Delaware limited partnership

Brandywine Norriton, L.P., a Pennsylvania limited partnership

Brandywine Operating Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership

Brandywine P.M., L.P., a Pennsylvania limited partnership

Brandywine TB Florig, L.P., a Pennsylvania limited partnership

Brandywine TB Inn, L.P., a Pennsylvania limited partnership

Brandywine TB I, L.P., a Pennsylvania limited partnership

Brandywine TB II, L.P., a Pennsylvania limited partnership

Brandywine TB V, L.P., a Pennsylvania limited partnership

Brandywine TB VI, L.P., a Pennsylvania limited partnership

Brandywine TB VIII, L.P., a Pennsylvania limited partnership

C/N Iron Run Limited Partnership III, a Pennsylvania limited partnership

C/N Leedom Limited Partnership II, a Pennsylvania limited partnership

C/N Oaklands Limited Partnership I, a Pennsylvania limited partnership

C/N Oaklands Limited Partnership III, a Pennsylvania limited partnership

Eight/Oliver Brandywine Partner, L.P., a Pennsylvania limited partnership

Eight Tower Bridge Development Associates, a Pennsylvania limited partnership

e-Tenants.com Holding, L.P., a Pennsylvania limited partnership

Fifteen Horsham, L.P., a Pennsylvania limited partnership

Five/Oliver Brandywine Partner, L.P., a Pennsylvania limited partnership

Five Tower Bridge Associates, a Pennsylvania limited partnership

Four Tower Bridge Associates, a Pennsylvania limited partnership

Iron Run Limited Partnership V, a Pennsylvania limited partnership

LC/N Horsham Limited Partnership, a Pennsylvania limited partnership

LC/N Keith Valley Limited Partnership I, a Pennsylvania limited partnership

Newtech IV Limited Partnership, a Pennsylvania limited partnership

New Two Logan, LP, a Pennsylvania limited partnership

Nichols Lansdale Limited Partnership III, a Pennsylvania limited partnership

OLS Office Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership

Radnor Center Associates, a Pennsylvania limited partnership

Radnor Properties Associates-II, L.P., a Pennsylvania limited partnership

Radnor Properties-SDC, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership

Radnor Properties-200 RC Holdings, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership

Radnor Properties-200 RC, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership

Radnor Properties-201 KOP, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership

Radnor Properties-555 LA, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership

Two Logan Holdings LP, a Pennsylvania limited partnership

Two Logan Square Associates, a Pennsylvania limited partnership

Six Tower Bridge Associates, a Pennsylvania limited partnership

Tower Bridge Inn Associates, a Pennsylvania limited partnership

Two Tower Bridge Associates, a Pennsylvania limited partnership

Witmer Operating Partnership I, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership

100 Arrandale Associates, L.P., a Pennsylvania limited partnership

111 Arrandale Associates, L.P., a Pennsylvania limited partnership

440 Creamery Way Associates, L.P., a Pennsylvania limited partnership

442 Creamery Way Associates, L.P., a Pennsylvania limited partnership

481 John Young Way Associates, L.P., a Pennsylvania limited partnership

Interstate Center Associates, a Virginia general partnership

Iron Run Venture II, a Pennsylvania general partnership

IR Northlight II Associates, a Pennsylvania general partnership

Plymouth TFC, General Partnership, a Pennsylvania general partnership

AAP Sub One, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Atlantic American Land Development, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Brandywine Grande C Corp., a Delaware corporation

Brandywine Holdings, I, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation

Brandywine Norriton Corp., a Pennsylvania corporation

Brandywine Realty Services Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation

BTRS, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Southpoint Land Holdings, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation

Valleybrooke Land Holdings, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation

1130 Commerce Associates LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

BRE/Logan I, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company

BRE/Logan II, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company

Brandywine Ambassador, L.L.C., a Pennsylvania limited liability company

Brandywine Brokerage Services, LLC, A New Jersey limited liability company

Brandywine Byberry LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

Brandywine Cira, LLC, a Pennsylvania limited liability company

Brandywine Charlottesville LLC, a Virginia limited liability company

Brandywine Christina LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

Brandywine Croton, LLC, a Pennsylvania limited liability company

Brandywine Dabney, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company

Brandywine Dominion, L.L.C., a Pennsylvania limited liability company

Brandywine F.C., L.L.C., a Pennsylvania limited liability company

Brandywine Grande B, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company

Brandywine Greentree V, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

Brandywine I.S., L.L.C., a Pennsylvania limited liability company

Brandywine Interstate 50, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company

Brandywine - Main Street, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

Brandywine Metroplex LLC., a Pennsylvania limited liability company

Brandywine Midatlantic, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

Brandywine Norriton, L.L.C., a Pennsylvania limited liability company

Brandywine One Logan LLC, a Pennsylvania limited liability company

Brandywine One Rodney Square, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company

Brandywine P.M., L.L.C., a Pennsylvania limited liability company

Brandywine Piazza, L.L.C., a New Jersey limited liability company

Brandywine Plaza 1000, L.L.C., a New Jersey limited liability company

Brandywine Promenade, L.L.C., a New Jersey limited liability company

Brandywine Radnor 200 Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

Brandywine Radnor Center LLC, a Pennsylvania limited liability company

Brandywine TB Florig, LLC, a Pennsylvania limited liability company

Brandywine TB Inn, L.L.C., a Pennsylvania limited liability company

Brandywine TB I, L.L.C., a Pennsylvania limited liability company

Brandywine TB II, L.L.C., a Pennsylvania limited liability company

Brandywine TB V, L.L.C., a Pennsylvania limited liability company

Brandywine TB VI, L.L.C., a Pennsylvania limited liability company

Brandywine TB VIII, L.L.C., a Pennsylvania limited liability company

Brandywine Trenton Urban Renewal, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company

Brandywine Witmer, L.L.C., a Pennsylvania limited liability company

Brandywine 300 Delaware, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

Christiana Center Operating Company I LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

Christiana Center Operating Company II LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

Christiana Center Operating Company III LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

e-Tenants LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

Macquarie BDN, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

Macquarie BDN Christina I, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

Macquarie BDN Christina III, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

New Two Logan GP, LLC, a Pennsylvania limited liability company

Radnor GP, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company

Radnor GP-SDC, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company

Radnor GP-200 RC, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company

Radnor GP-201 KOP, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company

Radnor GP-555 LA, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company

PJP Building Two, L.C., a Virginia limited liability company

PJP Building Three, L.C., a Virginia limited liability company

PJP Building Five, L.C., a Virginia limited liability company

1000 Chesterbrook Boulevard Partnership, a Pennsylvania general partnership

Atlantic American Properties Trust, a Maryland real estate investment trust

Prepared and filed by St Ives Burrups

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-52952, 333-69653, 333-56237, 333-53359, 333-46647, 333-20999, 333-109010, 333-117078) and in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-52957, 333-28427, 333-14243) of Brandywine Realty Trust and its subsidiaries of our report dated March 14, 2005 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedules, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 14, 2005

Prepared and filed by St Ives Burrups

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

I, Gerard H. Sweeney, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Brandywine Realty Trust:

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered in this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

	a.	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by other within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

	b.	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

	c.	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

	d.	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

	a.	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

	b.	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:	March 14, 2005	/s/ Gerard H. Sweeney

		Gerard H. Sweeney
		President and Chief Executive Officer

Prepared and filed by St Ives Burrups

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

I, Christopher P. Marr, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Brandywine Realty Trust:

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered in this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

	a.	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by other within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

	b.	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

	c.	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

	d.	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

	a.	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

	b.	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:	March 14, 2005	/s/ Christopher P. Marr

		Christopher P. Marr
		Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Prepared and filed by St Ives Burrups

Exhibit 32.1

RULE 13(a)-14(b) CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

In connection with the Annual Report of Brandywine Realty Trust (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gerard H. Sweeney, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Gerard H. Sweeney

Gerard H. Sweeney
President and Chief Executive Officer
Date:	March 14, 2005

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Brandywine Realty Trust and will be retained by Brandywine Realty Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Prepared and filed by St Ives Burrups

Exhibit 32.2

RULE 13(a)-14(b) CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

In connection with the Annual Report of Brandywine Realty Trust (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher P. Marr, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Christopher P. Marr

Christopher P. Marr
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Date:	March 14, 2005